Behold
Your God by Fred T.
Wright Click to
go to our Home Page
|
Page 111
tory statements. Therefore, while the dictionary must be
retained for determining the meaning of words used to describe human
activity, it is to be discarded when the knowledge of God’s procedures is
being sought.
Having determined
that these alternate definitions are not written in the dictionary, the
question arises as to where they can be found. The Bible is to be used as its
own dictionary. Only when we have learned to use it as such can a correct
comprehension of its messages be obtained.
God understood the
problems facing the human being and because He intended His Word to be an
understandable message to His people, He carefully incorporated within the
Scriptures, means whereby a clear definition of the words as He uses them in
describing His own behavior can be found. Thus there is no excuse for anybody
not obtaining the Scriptural definitions. They are there. God has provided
them and it is our duty to search them out and, having found them, to apply
them to the study of God’s Word.
The great second
Advent Movement was the mightiest spiritual undertaking this side of
Pentecost. It was brought into existence by the revelation of truth and it
was built upon a foundation of truth. That truth was arrived at by correct
principles of Bible interpretation, giving us a tremendous endorsement of the
system laid out in the above paragraphs. When the founding father of the
Advent Movement first began the systematic study of the Bible, he did so, not
according to dictionary interpretations of words, but according to Bible
definitions of those words.
We turn now to the
account of that man’s method of Bible study.
“Miller publicly
professed his faith in the religion which he had despised. But his infidel
associates were not slow to bring forward all those arguments which he
himself had often urged against the divine authority of the Scriptures. He
was not then prepared to answer them; but he reasoned that if the Bible is a
revelation from God, it must be
consistent with itself; and that as it was given for man’s instruction, it must be adapted to his understanding.
He determined to study the Scriptures for himself, and ascertain if every
apparent contradiction could not be harmonized.
“Endeavoring to lay aside all
preconceived opinions, and dispensing with commentaries, he compared Scripture with
Scripture by the aid of the marginal references and the concordance. He
pursued his study in a regular and methodical manner; beginning with Genesis, and reading verse by verse,
he proceeded no faster than the meaning of the several passages so unfolded
as to leave him free from all embarrassment. When he found anything obscure,
it was his custom to compare it with every other text which seemed to have
any reference to the matter under consideration. Every word was permitted to
have its proper bearing upon the subject of the text, and if his view of it
harmonized with every collateral passage, it ceased to be a difficulty. Thus
when ever he met with a passage hard to be understood, he found an explanation
in some other portion of Scrip-
Page 112
tures. As he studied with earnest prayer for divine
enlightenment, that which had before appeared dark to his understanding was
made clear. He experienced the truth of the psalmist’s words, ‘The entrance
of Thy words giveth light; it giveth understanding unto the simple.’” The Great Controversy, 319, 320.
Miller’s method of
Bible study is strongly endorsed as being the correct one in two ways.
Firstly, while the religious world of his day was using anything but this
method of study, he alone, by using it, under the guidance of the Holy
Spirit, arrived at the great, timely, saving truth of the advent message. It
is safe to say that if Miller had not used these methods of Bible study, he
certainly would never have arrived at the truths he did. The second
endorsement comes from the fact that here in The Great Controversy, the whole system is laid out as a
guideline for all who will follow it.
Let notice now be
taken of the main points in this system. Firstly, there is the mental
approach. Miller reasoned that the Bible, being a revelation from God, must
be consistent with itself. The
necessity on the student’s part of recognizing that there is no such thing as
a contradiction in the Word of God cannot be overemphasized. When this
conviction is firmly established, no effort will be made to wrench or twist
Scriptures to fit in with other Scripture. Rather, the student will study
with care, patience, and perseverance until the principles are so well
understood that the statements are brought into perfect harmony with each
other.
Secondly, Miller
recognized that inasmuch as the Bible is expressly written for man’s
instruction, it must be adapted to his understanding . In other words, he was
convinced that the Bible was not beyond the reach of man’s intellectual
grasp. It was written for man, therefore it could be understood by man.
Again, when a student has this conviction, he will not dismiss as impossible
to comprehend, those aspects of Scripture which do not fit in with his initial concepts.
Thirdly, Miller
endeavoured to lay aside all preconceived opinions, and, dispensing with
commentaries, he compared Scripture with Scripture by the aid of the marginal
references and the Concordance. There can hardly be a more serious barrier to
arriving at saving truth than that provided by preconceived opinions and
ideas. There is no person alive today who is not to a larger or lesser
degree, afflicted with this problem. During the entire span of our past lives,
we have been absorbing concepts, ideas and information. We have come to think
along certain lines and these thought processes have mostly been erroneous so
far as our concept of God’s kingdom is concerned.
The outstanding
example of this is found in the experience of Christ’s apostles. They were
born into a Jewish world wherein the prevailing expectations for the coming
of the Messiah was the advent of an all-conquering king. As those boys grew,
they heard this conversation around them. It was
Page 113
preached to them in church and taught to them in school. The
result was the building up of strong, preconceived notions of Christ’s work
and ministry. When the real Saviour appeared, those ideas formed a fearful
barrier which for a long time made it impossible for Christ to bring to them
the truth regarding His ministry and mission. Only when He was finally able
to sweep away those preconceived ideas, could He teach them the truth.
So with us today.
Every one of us should humbly recognize that we are not possessed of accurate
wisdom, knowledge, concepts, and ideas and that these erroneous thought
patterns are indeed a great problem.
“The stamps of
minds are different. All do not understand expressions and statements alike.
Some understand the statements of the Scriptures to suit their own particular
minds and cases. Prepossessions, prejudices, and passions have a strong
influence to darken the understanding and confuse the mind even in reading
the words of Holy Writ.” Selected
Messages, 1:20.[1]
“The Scriptures are
not to be adapted to meet the prejudice and jealousy of men. They can be
understood only by those who are humbly seeking for a knowledge of the truth that
they may obey it.” Christ’s Object
Lessons, 112.
Some may feel that earnestness and sincerity compensate for
accuracy. But Jesus plainly said, “And
ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:32.
It is the truth and not error which saves us. For this reason, God is
continually seeking to send us clearer and more advanced revelations of His
truth so we may correspondingly ascend into greater heights of religious
experience. Many a person will fail to enter the kingdom of heaven because
prejudice has barred the door to their receiving the truth.
Notice carefully
the solemn warnings laid out in this next quotation, which begins with the
question, “What shall I do to be saved?” The answer provided is an unexpected
and solemn one.
“Do you ask, What
shall I do to be saved? You must lay your preconceived opinions, your
hereditary and cultivated ideas, at the door of investigation. If you search
the Scriptures to vindicate your own opinions, you will never reach the
truth. Search in order to learn what the Lord says. If conviction comes as
you search, if you see that your cherished opinions are not in harmony with
the truth, do not misinterpret the truth in order to suit your own belief,
but accept the light given. Open mind and heart that you may behold wondrous
things out of God’s Word.” Christ’s
Object Lessons, 112.
There are a number
of answers which could have been given to the question “What shall I do to be
saved?” Elsewhere those answers are given, but here the point is made that
our salvation does depend upon laying aside preconceived opinions, hereditary
and cultivated ideas. William Miller did
Page 114
this and, because he did, arrived at saving truth. If we will do the same, we likewise will arrive at saving truth.
Note by Ron
Beaulieu: William Miller was first to be credited with what Ellen White
later adopted as his weight of evidence formula, which summarizes Wright’s
methodology, to wit:
Weight of Evidence Formula:
"1. Every word must have its proper bearing on the subject presented in
the Bible 2. All Scripture is necessary, and may be understood by diligent
application and study 3. Nothing revealed in Scripture can or will be hid
from those who ask in faith, not wavering 4. To understand doctrine, bring
all the scriptures together on the subject you wish to know, then let every
word have its proper influence and if you can form your theory without a
contradiction, you cannot be in error 5. Scripture must be its own expositor,
[interpreter] since it is a rule of itself. If I depend on a teacher to
expound to me, and he should guess at its meaning, or desire to have it so on
account of his sectarian creed, or to be thought wise, then his guessing,
desire, creed, or wisdom is my rule, and not the Bible." E.G. White, Second Advent
Review and Herald, 11-25-34, pr. 24. End note.
Pains
are being taken to emphasize this thought because in the field of knowledge
dealing with the character of God, wrong concepts are prolific. Any emergence
into this truth must be from a background of dark error and misconception.
The whole world lies in ignorance of God as He really is, and we who have
lived in that world have been unconsciously influenced by this atmosphere.
There is no subject, then, in which the need to lay aside preconceived ideas
and opinions is more critical than this one.
We come now to a key point in William
Miller’s approach to Bible study. As he proceeded from verse to verse, he
came inevitably upon a Scripture which baffled his understanding and which,
in turn, appeared to contradict what he had already learned in other parts of
the Word. How did he solve this problem? Discarding commentaries and
dictionaries, he used the Bible as it own dictionary. “Thus whenever
he met with a passage hard to be understood, he found an explanation in some
other portion of the Scriptures.” The Great Controversy, 320.
He followed “his rule of making
Scripture its own interpreter.” ibid., 324. By doing this, he avoided
the perilous pitfall of private or human interpretations, which can only lead
astray. The one thing which cannot be permitted in the quest for truth as God
sees it, is the use of private or human interpretation of God’s revelations.
It would be far better not to study the Bible at all, than to search it with
the wrong method. Make the Scriptures their own dictionary, their own
interpreter. Do this under the blessing and guidance of the Holy Spirit, and
the assurance is there of the certainty of arriving at an accurate,
comprehensive, and harmonious knowledge of saving truth.
This will take time
so it is not to be expected that every error will be immediately swept away.
While Miller arrived at tremendous concepts of saving truth, he did not live
long enough to find deliverance from every preconceived error of the past.
This does not deny for an instant the validity of his method of study. It
only underlines the truth that it takes time, even with correct methods of
study, to come to an accurate grasp of divine revelations. After all, God’s
truth is the expression of the mind of the Infinite. Eternity will never
exhaust it. Therefore, it is too much to expect that a person using perfect
methods of study would emerge in a few short years from deep darkness to a
correct understanding of the great verities. Appreciation should be felt for
the tremendous progress Miller made in breaking away from the erroneous
teachings of his day.
The sound and solid
foundations laid down by William Miller were continued and developed by later
Adventist expositors. To establish this point we could bring as evidence, the
development of such truths as the two laws, the Sabbath question, and so on.
Our choice falls upon the subject of the final punishment of the wicked. It
is common understanding in worldly
Page 115
churches that the fires of final purification will unceasingly
burn the unrepentant wicked who will suffer unending torture and torment
within those unquenchable flames. The advent message denies this concept,
teaching, rather, a short consumption of the lost to render them as though
they had never been.
In the early days of Adventism, the truth on this subject had
not been developed. It was not developed by William Miller but by the people
who came after him. As the new idea was advanced, it met with serious
objection and opposition. It is a difficult subject to present because there
are certain Scriptures which make it
appear that the wicked do burn forever and ever. Just as it is possible
in the subjects of the two laws, the Sabbath, and the character of God, to
gather two completely different sets of statements, with one apparently
supporting one side, and the other seeming to present an opposite view, so it
is in the question of the final punishment of the wicked.
It hardly seems
necessary to quote the many statements from Scripture which tell us that the
wicked will be as though they had not been, that we shall tread down their
ashes, that they shall burn, leaving neither root nor branch. We know the
Scriptures tell us that the dead know nothing, that their very thoughts are
gone. This is one side of the question, but, on the other side are statements
which clearly say that the wicked will burn forever. The most noteworthy
reference of this nature is in Revelation
20:10. “And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire
and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are and shall be
tormented day and night forever and ever.”
As an exercise in
the correct principles of Bible study, let this verse be taken and
interpreted according to dictionary definitions of the key words to show us
the wrong way of Bible interpretation.
The important key
words in this particular verse are the words “for ever and ever.” In our minds
there already exists a clear definition of this word which is in harmony with
the written definition in the published dictionary reading as follows,
“Forever means for a limitless time or endless ages, everlastingly,
eternally, at all times, always, continually, incessantly.” If this
dictionary definition of the word “forever” is taken and Revelation 20:10
understood according to it then the only possible understanding of this verse
would be that the wicked suffer eternally. One could only believe that there
would never come a time when their agonies would end. It is hoped that no one
will miss the point that a certain method of interpretation will yield its
corresponding idea of what the truth is.
Serious doubt of the validity of this method is gendered when
it is seen that it brings this text into sharp contradiction with other
Scriptures. Here are two examples.
“For as ye have
drunk upon My holy mountain, so shall all the heathen drink continually, yea,
they shall drink, and they shall swallow down, and they shall be as though
they had not been.” Obadiah 16.
Page 116
“For, behold, the
day cometh, that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that
do wickedly, shall be stubble: and the day that cometh shall burn them up, saith
the Lord of hosts, that it shall leave them neither root nor branch.” Malachi 4:1.
It is obviously
impossible for the wicked to be as though they had not been, and to be burned
up leaving neither root nor branch, and yet, at the same time, exist
eternally. That is a contradiction, which will exist in our minds and will
continue to exist until the understanding of the messages of these verses is
changed, wherever it needs to be changed. Let it be strongly emphasized that
the Scriptures themselves must not be changed. It is the understanding of the
Scriptures which must be changed until there is perfect harmony.
This is a very
different approach to the problem from that employed by those who do use
dictionary definitions for these words. Their procedure is to carefully
collect all statements supporting their chosen side of the question, and as
carefully, to ignore those which speak contrary to their accepted ideas. This
is no way to study the Bible, yet it is the most commonly accepted method.
The only safety
lies in discarding dictionary definitions of words wherever those words are a
problem and to seek for a revised understanding of the meaning of the
statements. The only way to discover that other meaning is by making the
Bible and the Bible only, its own dictionary, and therefore its own
interpreter. The Advent people, in determining the message of the verse,
Revelation 20:10, which speaks of the wicked burning eternally, found it
necessary to discover the Bible meaning of those words. They learned that, in
Bible usage, the word has a different meaning from what it has in everyday
usage. We quote now from the book Answers to Objections by F.D. Nichol, 360,
361.
“We read of ‘Sodom
and Gomorrah, and the cities about them . . . suffering the vengeance of
eternal [aionios] fire.’ Jude 7.
Are those cities, set ablaze long ago as a divine judgment, still burning?
No; their ruins are quite submerged by the Dead Sea. The Bible itself
specifically states that God turned ‘the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into
ashes.’ 2 Peter 2:6. Now the fate
of these cities is declared to be a warning to all wicked men of the fate
that impends for them. Therefore if the “aionios
fire” of that long ago judgment turned into ashes those upon whom it preyed,
and then died down of itself, we may properly conclude that the “aionios fire” of the last day will do
likewise.
“When we turn to
the Old Testament we discover that ‘everlasting’ and ‘for ever’ sometimes
signify a very limited time. We shall quote texts in which these two terms
are translated from the Hebrew word olam,
because olam is the equivalent of
the Greek aion.
“The Passover was
to be kept ‘forever [olam].’ Exodus 12:24. But it ended with the
cross. (See Heb. 9:24-26) Aaron and
his sons were to offer in
Page 117
cense ‘for ever [olam].’
(1 Chron. 23:13), and to have an everlasting [olam] priesthood.’ Ex.
40:1, But this priesthood, with its offerings of incense, ended at the cross
(See Heb. 7:11-14). A servant who
desired to stay with his master, was to serve him ‘for ever [olam]’ (See Ex. 21:1-6). How could a servant serve a master to endless time?
Will there be masters and servants in the world to come? Jonah, describing
his watery experience, said, ‘The earth with her bars was about me for ever [olam].’ Jonah 2:6. Yet this ‘for ever’ was only ‘three days and three
nights’ long. Jonah 1:7. Rather a
short ‘for ever.’ Because Gehazi practiced deceit, Elisha declared, ‘The
leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee [Gehazi], and unto thy seed for ever [olam].’ 2 Kings 5:27.
Should we conclude, therefore, that Gehazi’s family would never end, and that
thus leprosy would be perpetuated for all time to come?
“Thus by the acid
test of actual usage we discover that in a number of cases aion, aionios, and olam have a very
limited time value.”
Now that you have
read the above statement from Nichol, it would be helpful to answer the
following questions.
1.
How much reference did F.D. Nichol make to standard
dictionaries when seeking the definition of “everlasting,” and “for ever,” as
those words are to be used in the Scriptures?
The answer is: No reference at all.
2.
What then did he use as his dictionary when seeking the
definition of those words as used in Scripture?
The answer is: The Word of God and that alone.
3.
Did he find the words meant the same in Scripture usage as
they do in every day usage?
The answer is : No! The meanings are very different indeed.
That means that “everlasting” and “forever,” have one meaning when used in our everyday speech but a different meaning when used in the Scriptures.
4.
What is the meaning in everyday speech and as found in the
dictionary of “everlasting” and “for ever?”
The answer is: These words mean eternally; without ever
ceasing at all.
5.
What is the meaning when the same words are used in Scripture?
Answer: It
signifies time in unbroken duration so long as the nature of the subject
allows. Thus in the case of the wicked, their sinful human nature does not
allow a very long time in the fire before they are reduced to ashes; but be
assured that the fire will go on for ever, that is, in unbroken duration,
until they are consumed. On the other hand the nature of God and of the
redeemed is that they go on forever as long as their immortal natures allow,
and that will be eternally without ever ceasing at all.
It should now be clear that when the words “for ever and ever” are
interpreted according to dictionary definitions, a certain understanding of
that verse will emerge, while if the Bible is used to uncover its usage of
the words, then a very different understanding will result. In other words,
ac-
Page 118
cording to the system of interpretation used will the
resulting conclusions be. Set the method right and the desired objective of
knowing saving truth will be naturally forthcoming.
A sound test of the
true method is that it removes impossible contradictions and replaces them
with harmony and cohesion. There will be no need to ignore statements which
otherwise do not fit.
Once the correct method has been found,
it is to be applied with unfailing consistency throughout the entire study of
the Bible. One system cannot be used in one area and a different one used in
another. It has been astonishing to see people having no trouble in believing
that the wicked do not burn forever, and then rejecting the principle that
God destroys only by trying to save. Yet exactly the same methods of
interpretation used to arrive at the former were the only means of arriving
at the latter.
This does not mean
that every word will have other than a dictionary definition when used in the
Scriptures. Many will have the same meaning, but there will always be key
words which do not. They are readily recognized, for whenever a word, when
understood according to its common everyday usage, creates a serious problem,
then it is time to search out its Scriptural meaning as against its common
one.
Throughout this
book, with strict consistency, we will adhere to the Scriptural method of
interpretation. When we find ourselves confronted with two statements or
more, which, on the surface, stand in sharp contradiction to each other, we
shall follow this procedure:
·
Faith shall retain firm hold of the truth that there is no
contradiction in the Word of God.
·
Every endeavour will be made to lay aside old preconceived
ideas and opinions.
·
No reference will be made to a dictionary to solve the
problem.
·
The Scriptures alone will be consulted for the answer as to
what these words mean when they are used in them.
This line of
approach will be continued until every disharmony of thought disappears and
every statement tells the same message.
Therefore, for
anyone to deny the message of this book, he will have to prove firstly that
these methods of interpretation are false. If, however, he should agree that
they are true, then he will have to show wherein we have not adhered to these
principles. We confidently challenge anyone to prove either or both if they
can.
We believe that we
stand upon solid ground in our approach to the subject and that what is
written herein is a true statement of the character of God.
Click here for Chapter Thirteen
Click here for the Table of Contents to all Chapters
.