Meeting my Detractors

 

 

 

 

 

 

Click here to go to our Home Page


 

 

Note: This statement will be added to periodically.

 

Dear Reader,

The link to a biographical sketch of Ron Beaulieu has been changed to: http://omega77.tripod.com/biorwb2.htm because the original link has been used by one of my detractors to place the following false account of me on the Internet.

There is much that I choose to let “go by the board” concerning my detractors, but some things have to be met. The misrepresentation you have just read at the link that referred you here, is just patently false. Here is what is misrepresented concerning me at the following link:

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/seventh-day-adventist/T5GUKPFR1A5IGLVDF

I will intersperse my response to Mr. Eugene Schubert (schubee) below his comments constituting the following diatribe:

Ron Beaulieu claims to be a prophet called by the Lord to devote all his time to the advancement of the Three Angel’s Messages but he is obviously mistaken. There isn’t the slightest bit of evidence that he understands the meaning of Revelation 14:6-12.

Ron responds: Ellen White stated that the three angel’s messages covers a broad spectrum of data that even most SDA ministers do not comprehend. In her statement below, Ellen White refers to the National Reform Movement. That was the predecessor to the ecumenical movement of today. Here is what she says about that movement:

“The peculiar work of the third angel has not been seen in its importance. God meant that His people should be far in advance of the position which they occupy today. But now, when the time has come for them to spring into action, they have the preparation to make. When the National Reformers [the title of the ecumenical movement before it became the Federal Council of Churches in 1908, and then the World Council of Churches, in 1948] began to urge measures to restrict religious liberty, our leading men should have been alive to the situation and should have labored earnestly to counteract these efforts. It is not in the order of God that light has been kept from our people—the very present truth which they needed for this time. Not all our ministers who are giving the third angel’s message really understand what constitutes that message. The National Reform [Ecumenical] movement has been regarded by some as of so little importance that they have not thought it necessary to give much attention to it and have even felt that in so doing they would be giving time to questions distinct from the third angel’s message [the Everlasting Gospel of Revelation 14]. May the Lord forgive our brethren for thus interpreting the very message for this time.” E.G. White, Testimonies, Vol. 5, 714, 715.

 

It should be obvious to anyone who truly understands the three angel’s messages, that they warn us to come out of Babylon and that we must stay out. The ecumenical movement would include all Christians of the world in one New World Order church, one New World Order day of worship (Sunday), one New world Order banking system, and one New World order government per the feet and toes kingdom described in Daniel 2. So in giving much time to the SDA church’s involvement with the ecumenical movement, I have been dealing directly with the three angel’s messages in a way that Mr. Schubert does not understand. He may well lose out on salvation because of lack of knowledge, because Ellen White says in Word to the Little Flock, p. 14, that all who stray from the Midnight Cry, of 1844, after hearing and understanding it, will fall off the pathway to heaven and that it will be IMPOSSIBLE to get back on it. So this is a very serious issue. Ellen White said that the Midnight Cry gave power to the second angel’s message in 1844, and that it will be repeated as part of the final Loud Cry message.

 

So it seems to be Mr. Schubert who does not understand the three angel’s messages and the Midnight Cry obligation, especially as they are implicated with Isaiah 8:9-12 and Matthew 25:1-5, along with the express duty to repudiate serious errors of apostasy that have crept into the church:

 

“The enemy of souls has sought to bring in the supposition that a great reformation was to take place among Seventh-day Adventists, and that this reformation would consist in giving up the doctrines which stand as the pillars of our faith, and engaging in a process of reorganization. Were this reformation to take place, what would result? The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed. The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A NEW ORGANIZATION would be established. Books of a NEW ORDER would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy would be introduced. The founders of this system would go into the cities, and do a wonderful work. The Sabbath of course, would be lightly regarded, as also the God who created it. Nothing would be allowed to stand in the way of the NEW MOVEMENT. The leaders would teach that virtue is better than vice, but GOD BEING REMOVED, they would place their dependence on human power, which, without God, is worthless. Their foundation would be built on the sand, and storm and tempest would sweep away the structure. 

Who has authority to begin such a [NEW] movement? We have our Bibles, we have our experience, attested to by the miraculous working of the Holy Spirit. We have a truth that admits of no compromise. Shall we not repudiate everything that is not in harmony with this truth? E.G. White, Selected Messages, Vol. 1, 204, 205.  



“Sadly, Mr. Beaulieu thinks that his compilations of the writings of Ellen G. White and his understanding of them somehow qualifies him as some sort of special messenger and interpreter.

http://omega77.tripod.com/biorwb.htm


Schubert: I don't think that Ellen White's writings need interpretation. I think that Sister White's message is plain and readily transparent....”

 

Ron’s response: Mr. Schubert has misinterpreted a few Ellen White statements to make it appear that all we should be involved with is a peace and safety affirmative message. I deal with far more than just a few such statements by Ellen G. White. I relate her statements JUST AS THEY READ to Biblical statements JUST AS THEY READ. Ellen White accused the leaders of misrepresenting her statements out of context and I employ the following formula scrupulously to establish her statements that have been misrepresented back into the proper context:

 

1.    Weight of Evidence Formula: "1. Every word must have its proper bearing on the subject presented in the Bible 2. All Scripture is necessary, and may be understood by diligent application and study 3. Nothing revealed in Scripture can or will be hid from those who ask in faith, not wavering 4. To understand doctrine, bring all the scriptures together on the subject you wish to know, then let every word have its proper influence and if you can form your theory without a contradiction, you cannot be in error 5. Scripture must be its own expositor, [interpreter] since it is a rule of itself. If I depend on a teacher to expound to me, and he should guess at its meaning, or desire to have it so on account of his sectarian creed, or to be thought wise, then his guessing, desire, creed, or wisdom is my rule, and not the Bible." E.G. White, Second Advent Review and Herald, 11-25-34, pr. 24.

 

I also relate visions of important insight that God has given to me to relate to His people.

Schubert: “Another great mistake that Ron Beaulieu has fallen into is that he spends too much time creating or exaggerating minor errors to rail against. http://omega77.tripod.com/indepth.htm
It is for this reason that Sister White said that we should dwell on affirmative truths.

Ron responds: I believe that any thinking person who makes an honest study of the issues I deal in will conclude that they are not minor exaggerations of mere “minor errors, that I have “created.” Here is a study of the all important issues I deal in:

http://omega77.tripod.com/indepth.htm

The following statements by Ellen White, as quoted by Mr. Schubert, totally ignore any sighing and crying for all the abominations upon which our being sealed by the Man in Linen (Ezekiel 9) is predicated and CONDITIONAL TO:

“Who are standing in the counsel of God at this time? Is it those who virtually excuse wrongs among the professed people of God, and murmur in their hearts, if not openly, against those who would reprove sin? It is those who take their stand against them, and sympathize with those who commit wrong?--No, indeed! These, unless they repent, and leave the work of Satan in oppressing those who have the burden of the work, and in holding up the hands of sinners in Zion, will never receive the mark of God's sealing approval. They will fall in the general destruction of all the wicked, represented by the five men bearing slaughter weapons. Mark this point with care; those who receive the pure mark of truth, wrought in them by the power of the Holy Ghost, represented by the man in linen, are those "that sigh and cry for all the abominations that are done" in the church. Their love for purity and the honor and glory of God is such, and they have so clear a view of the exceeding sinfulness of sin, that they are represented as being in an agony, even sighing and crying.” E.G. White, {Review and Herald Articles, June 8, 1886 par. 2}

 

Apparently, Mr. Schubert uses only a few Ellen White statements to excuse his total lack in sighing and crying for all the abominations in the church, and the unpopular duty of fulfilling Isaiah 58:1. There are a lot of Adventists who choose to take the same position Mr. Schubert takes and for the same reason. Indifference to strictly forbidden apostasy, is far different than mere questions that arise:

 

"If God abhors one sin above another, of which His people are guilty, it is doing nothing in case of an emergency. Indifference and neutrality in a religious crisis is regarded of God as a grevious crime and equal to the very worst type of hostility against God." Testimonies, Vol.3, p.281.

 

It should be totally apparent to the discerning reader that Mr. Eugene Schubert does not possess the spiritual discernment to distinguish between gross apostasies that constitute an emergency and the omega of apostasy by the SDA church, so he chooses indifference and neutrality in a religious crisis of the greatest magnitude. His indifference is the very worst type of hostility against God, and those whom God is using to expose the emergency of omega apostasy. Here are the Ellen White statements he and they hide behind.

"Dwell not on the negative points of questions that arise, but gather to your minds affirmative truths, and fasten them there by much study and earnest prayer and heart consecration. Keep your lamps trimmed and burning; and let bright rays shine forth, that men, beholding your good works, may be led to glorify your Father which is in heaven."

 

Ron responds: My Website is full of affirmative truths, but are all the abominations of apostasy negative points we to deal with them? Let’s let Ellen White answer:

 

“Mark this point with care: Those who receive the pure mark of truth, wrought in them by the power of the Holy Ghost, represented by a mark by the man in linen, are those "that sigh and that cry for all the abominations that be done" in the church.” {Mar 240.1}

 

“Reproofs always hurt human nature. Many are the souls that have been destroyed by the unwise sympathy of their brethren; for, because the brethren sympathized with them, they thought they must indeed have been abused, and that the reprover was all wrong and had a bad spirit. The only hope for sinners in Zion is to fully see and confess their wrongs, and put them away. Those who step in to destroy the edge of sharp reproof that God sends, saying that the reprover was partly wrong and the reproved was not just right, please the enemy. Any way that Satan can devise to make the reproofs of none effect will accomplish his design. Some will lay blame upon the one whom God has sent with a message of warning, saying, He is too severe; and in so doing they become responsible for the soul of the sinner whom God desired to save, and to whom, because He loved him, He sent correction, that he might humble his soul before God and put his sins from him. These false sympathizers will have an account to settle with the Master by-and-by for their work of death.”{3T 329.1}

 

Schubert quotes:

"Often, as you seek to present the truth, opposition will be aroused; but if you seek to meet the opposition with argument, you will only multiply it, and this you cannot afford to do. Hold to the affirmative. Angels of God are watching you, and they understand how to impress those whose opposition you refuse to meet with arguments. Dwell not on the negative points of questions that arise, but gather to your minds affirmative truths, and fasten them there by much study, earnest prayer, and heart consecration. Keep your lamps trimmed and burning, and let bright rays shine forth, that men, beholding your good works, may be led to glorify your Father who is in heaven."

"If Christ had not held to the affirmative in the wilderness of temptation, He would have lost all that He desired to gain. Christ's way is the best way to meet our opponents. We strengthen their arguments when we repeat what they say. Keep always to the affirmative. It may be that the very man who is opposing you will carry your words home, and be converted to the sensible truth that has reached his understanding."

"Do not cherish a spirit of controversy. Little good is accomplished by denunciatory speeches. The surest way to destroy false doctrine is to preach the truth. Keep to the affirmative. Let the precious truths of the gospel kill the force of evil. Show a tender, pitiful spirit toward the erring. Come close to hearts."

 

Eugene Schubert

 

Ron responds to the above three statements quoted by Schubert:

 

Gross apostasy in the church calls for a response and only those who warn the people of such apostasy will be sealed according to Ezekiel 9. Ellen White says that the entire chapter of Isaiah 58:1 is our work.

 

The next item was posted by my daughter Racquelle (Beaulieu) Pilon, on Eugene Schubert’s board:

 

 

Here is my daughter’s testimony against me. By the way, Eugene Shubert (alias Shubee) has claimed to be a prophet.

 

Shubee wrote:

Ron Beaulieu claims to be a prophet called by the Lord...

As the daughter of Ron Beaulieu, I felt I may have a couple of things to say on this particular topic and some light to shed on the character of my father.
I don't write this in bitterness or in any way to unnecessarily defame my father. I write this in love and concern as I have seen many people deceived and hurt by him with no recourse to help in any way.
I have not spoken to nor had any contact with my father for the past 20 years, due to my father's character and actions.
What my father fails to mention in his biography is that he was married and has 4 children - myself, my 2 brothers, and a half brother whom I've never met.

 

 He was repeatedly almost pathologically unfaithful to my mother, causing her to leave him several times. At one point, while attending Southern Missionary College, my mother became aware of an extramarital affair with a fellow student and left my father to return to her family in Canada. During this separation, my father lied to both his lover and his family, claiming he obtained a divorce from mother. Upon his claims, he and the other women were married (while still be legally married to my mother). All of this information has be related to me by mother and confirmed by my father's sisters. Upon learning that he was still in fact married to my mother, his illegal wife left him, taking their unborn child with her. My mother granted my father a divorce to save he from facing prosecution is the US.
All of these events happened after 1960 'the year Ron was first called by the Lord, to begin the task of exposing the cherished errors of the professing SDA Church.'
Upon his return to immigration to Canada in 1973, my father returned to my mother with the claims that he wanted his family back and that they would be remarried. None of this was true, and in the course of things my father had my mother sell her home supposedly to buy a new larger place for the family but, instead, used the funds to purchase his own place. My mother finally left him for good in 1976. My relationship with him remained difficult and hurtful until I cut all ties with him to keep my children from being influenced or hurt by him in any way.
My father was violent and abusive father to my brothers and a neglectful parent to me.
He sets himself as some kind of prophet, even setting up his own 'compound' about 15yrs ago in Alberta taking tithe and the life savings of his 'followers'. I received a sad phone call one afternoon from a women looking for some information that might help her retrieve the over $20,000 she and her husband had been deceived into turning over to his 'ministry'.
My father was exposed to the teachings of the Shepard's Rod at a young age and the influence their spirit and teachings can been seen in his spirit and teachings.
I believe in forgiveness, redemption and the new birth. I have forgiven my father and I would never bring up a moment of his past if he has in anyway sought restitution form those he has hurt. I cannot judge a man's heart and perhaps my father has truly and sincerely repented of all his sins. I do believe though, that the fruit of that would be seen in humility and the seeking out of those he has sinned against. On the contrary, he continues to blame and cast dispersions on the character of the very ones he has hurt, refusing responsibility, blaming my mother for his infidelity even labelling my brothers and I his 'devil children'.
All I can say is; 'Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.' Matthew7:19-21
Sincerely,
Racquelle Pilon (nee Beaulieu)

 

 

The Unfortunate Lying Testimony

 

of 

 

My Daughter Racquelle  (Pilon) Beaulieu

 

Click to go to our Home Page


 

 

 

 

 

Dear friends,

 

There are things in any divorce that are never known by any other persons, not even the children involved. That is why it is very unwise for outsiders to make judgments.

 

Unfortunately, at times, one or both parties to a divorce become belligerent and in an effort to save face, tell all manner of untruths. That is what I am faced with in the testimony of my daughter to a public forum. Because there are always facts that will never be known to any party, it is most unfortunate and unwise that my daughter made the indiscretion of trying to elucidate on many things she could only have received second-hand from her disenchanted mother.

 

In an effort to set the record straight as to my side of the story, it is now necessary for me to make the following statement, and I do so before the Lord, and do say that all I state is the truth and may the Lord bar me from heaven if it is not. Here is the link where my daughter made a testimony against me. My rebuttal appears below.

 

Ron Beaulieu

 

 

C:\Users\Ron\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\ET3ISZWU\Ron Beaulieu is a false prophet - Topix.mht

 

All I can say about my daughter’s testimony, is this:

 

·       When I was divorced (1973), my daughter was a very small girl  of 6 or 7 years of age. All three were very young children at that time. They understand only what their mother has told them in her effort to turn them against me. Her mother told me that if I would not remain with her, I would not have the children either; that she would see to that! She did a good job of turning them against me so that they have not had contact with me for 20 years, as my daughter attests. That is about the only statement she made correctly.

·       My Ex told me on the phone that the divorce would go through that day. It was discovered later by me that it was a few days later that it finally went through. So I did not lie about it. There was a slight delay for some reason or another unbeknownst to me.

·       The true reasons for my divorce are very personal and known only to myself, God and my ex. I will keep it that way. I will say that NOT ONCE did my Ex ever leave me. I left her and for good reasons that are now between me and God, as my Ex died from breast cancer a number of years ago. Fact is, she bragged to a friend of my current wife that I would always return to her. Again, before the Lord, she never left me as my daughter states.

·       Apparently, when I found the love letter to my Ex from the prisoner she was then visiting in jail, she was planning to feather her nest with him at my expense, and would have THEN left me FOR THE FIRST TIME, but never before that, and I left before she had opportunity to leave me.

·       Her mother and I were divorced. I did not lie about the divorce. I have the papers to prove that fact. I repeat, my divorce was finalized BEFORE I returned to Canada and I was married to the “other woman” for one year and the child was about one year old when we parted. So it is a diabolical lie for my daughter to assert that my Ex granted me a divorce to avoid prosecution in the U.S.A., and that IS NOT the reason I parted with the other woman. My daughter asserts that the child was UNBORN, when actually the child was about one year old when we his mother and I parted ways. I have pictures of the child to prove it and my sisters have seen those pictures. This is a classic example of how dreadfully errant my daughter is, whether it is out of ignorance because of her young age (6-7) when all this occurred and/or the lying witness of her mother to save her own face to her daughter.

·       My Ex wife came with my three children to see me and the “other woman” I was married to, in San Francisco, in 1973. The child of the “other woman” was then about 1 year old. It is unfortunate that my daughter does not recall that visit, for she claims the woman left me with an unborn child. I now believe the only reason the woman married me was so as to not have the child out of wedlock.

·        I informed my Ex that I came to Canada to be a father to my children but from the very first meeting, I stated that I would never re-marry her again. Some may not realize it but it is against the Bible to re-marry after a divorce.

·       Divorce Deut. 24:4.

(1) If a man marries a woman who becomes displeasing to him because he finds something indecent about her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce, gives it to her and sends her from his house, (2) and if after she leaves his house she becomes the wife of another man, (3) and her second husband dislikes her and writes her a certificate of divorce, gives it to her and sends her from his house, or if he dies, (4) then her first husband, who divorced her, is not allowed to marry her again after she has been defiled. That would be detestable in the eyes of the LORD .

·       I have no other child than the three by my Ex and no one will ever prove that I do because I simply do not. The child my daughter refers to was the child of another man, and that is one reason I did not remain with his mother. God knows this to be the truth.

·       My ex was disgruntled with me because I would not re-marry her, but I said that would never happen because it is against the Bible.

·       The woman I married in the states AFTER my ex told me the divorce had gone through, had been in love with a man who had not reciprocated her love for him. Just before we got married, she went to see him in a last ditch attempt to get him to marry her. She later admitted that they had sex and she became pregnant. I later discovered that I had a growth hormone disorder at the time that killed sperm, so the child could not possibly have been mine. We were married for over a year, and she absolutely DID NOT leave me for the reasons my daughter cites. I later discovered she wanted to leave because she and her family were afraid of what I might do if I found out that the child she bore was not mine. I loved that child very much for the year I was with him and his mother.

·       My ex-wife spread such lies to my sisters and to this woman’s family that they all rejected me. I loved her very much, but they convinced her she was just another fling of mine which God knows was not the truth of the matter.

·       The “other woman” and I were married after calling my ex in Canada to determine that the divorce would go through that very day. That was confirmed and we were married that day. But later, I discovered that the divorce was delayed for a few days, but it did go through. There was never any threat by any official that I had been a bigamist, and to my knowledge I had not.

·       Soon after returning to Canada, to be with my children, my ex-wife became involved with a prison visitation ministry. She fell in love with a prisoner, and I found a love letter from him in the glove-compartment of the car. Just before finding that love letter, I had invested in land and a home where I would reside with them to be a father to my children. I had not relations with their mother. Upon finding the love letter in my car which she had used to go to the prison, I cancelled the land and home purchase and lived by myself for about a year until meeting my present wife. I lost much money I had made in down payment on the land and a home. I was going to remain single and just be a father to my children. That was my quest.

·       One of the lesser reasons why I left my Ex was because she would not permit any discipline of my children. She considered it abuse if I wanted them to help weed the garden etc. It was play, play and more play as far as she was concerned. She had never had to learn to work and could never hold a job because of that fact. Thus, I was considered abusive if I tried to teach my children how to work according to the same work ethic my father rightly instilled in me. So that charge is foolish and false.

·       I was not a neglectful parent in any sense of the word. I made good money and would take my children to the best stores and tell them to get whatever they wanted. I bought then a new piano upon returning to Canada, and tried to teach them how to play. I bought one of my sons a new Honda motorbike. I bought whatever they needed and much of what they wanted. God knows that I did not neglect them in any way. But lies were circulated such as the one that I did not buy them shoes. They loved to go without shoes, so the neighbors circulated the lie that I would not buy them shoes. Does that make sense when I bought them a new $3,000 piano and my son a new motorbike (1974)? And I gave their mother a really nice car that everyone raved about. She and her ex-con husband traded that car in on a new Pontiac and lost it within a three months. The prisoner left my Ex within about a year after getting her to sell everything I had purchased for my children and giving him the money.

·       I repeat, my Ex NEVER left me one time. I left her a few times just before I divorced her. God is my witness to this and all the other parts of my rebuttal to my daughter’s false accusations, which are very serious, but she may not know any better because she has never asked my side of the story. She and her brothers accepted the gross untruths told them by their mother. She told me that she would alienate them from me if she could not have me and she did a good job of that.

·       My immediate family did not like my first wife because they caught her in numerous lies over the years. She was a pathological liar and unfortunately, it seems that my daughter may have inherited that characteristic of her mother.

·       My Ex admitted over the phone that she had spent a week-end in a motel with the prisoner who had just been released from jail and that had sexual relations with him. My current wife was on the other end of the phone when my Ex made that confession. That is the only reason my current wife would marry me. We have been married since 1979.

·       The prisoner my Ex wife married had the sexual perversion of wanting to watch her have sex with another man. One of my sons found pictures of him watching my Ex in such an act. That was traumatic to him to say the least. That is the kind of woman she proved to be. She would also leave the children in the car and go into bars to drink with the man.

·       My ex wife’s father bought her a mobile home and I never saw a penny from the sale of that home. She was still living in it when I left her because of the ex-con she became involved with. At the time, I owned my own home in Sylvan Lake, Alberta, and it was money from the sale of that property that I used to purchase my property. My Ex wife later sold her mobile home after she married the ex-con who stripped her of everything she owned, including the money from the mobile home, and then left her. My current wife and I had been married for a number of years at that time and I was paying child support, and there was no reason that we would have received anything from the sale of my Ex’s home. I had no part in that whatsoever and did not receive one cent from it. Of course, my current wife is well aware of this fact. As I said, years before, I lost downpayment money I had made on the property I was about to buy when I discovered the love letter from her prisoner friend in my car she had used to travel to the prison. It is an absolute lie that I profited one cent from the sale of her mobile home which occurred AFTER I left her. She surely would not have given me a cent THEN, and she surely did not. Nor did I need or want her money. I was making over a hundred grand plus per year at the time. My current wife knows this to be a fact as she was an accountant doing my books.

·       I was married in the SDA church by an SDA Minister who substantiated the facts of my case (very contrary to my daughters disillusionment by her mother) before he would marry my current wife and I. We have been very happily married for 30 years as of March 11, 2010.

·       My children never accepted my current wife because they felt I would have stayed with their mother had I not re-married. A woman who works with my wife currently, told my wife that my ex and children had said this to her. The woman was close friends with my Ex-wife. However, that is not the case. I was divorced from my Ex in 1973, and married my current wife in 1979. That was sufficient time to demonstrate that I would not remarry my Ex in violation of the Scriptures.

·       My Ex told me she had never been spanked. I believed in spanking so when I did I was considered “violent!” And when I wanted them to do any chore, I was cruel no matter how kind I was in encouraging my kids to do ordinary and easy tasks they were capable of doing. Their mother would say to me right in front of them that they wanted to go play with so and so. Thus, I was always the villain.

·       I had absolutely no knowledge of the Shepherd’s Rod until 1987--88, when someone sent me some of their literature. I read it and immediately discerned their serious errors and NEVER, EVER, embraced that belief system. My daughter is telling a blatant lie in this regard, as is most of her testimony, for which she will one day answer. I have faithfully exposed the untruths of the Shepherd’s Rod since first reading their material. It is errantly and evilly surmised that because I quote Ellen White in her saying that Ezekiel 9 is literally fulfilled at the end-time, that I am a Shepherd’s Rod person. I discovered that statement long before I knew what Shepherd’s Rodsmen teach. I consider this charge by my daughter to be a deliberate attempt at serious slander, as are most of her allegations. The Shepherd’s Rod is vehemently AGAINST separation from the church, so in that regard, my daughter is far more a Shepherd’s Rod like person.  My Website exposes the serious errors of the Shepherd’s Rod. It is a diabolical lie for my daughter or anyone to say that I was ever involved with the Shepherd’s Rod or that I was influenced by them in the least. I was given my message long BEFORE I ever read anything about what the Shepherd’s Rod teaches. My wife of 30 years is fully aware of the veracity of this fact.

·       I did not set up a “compound.!” I have a home and property in the country as Ellen White instructed us to have. The word “compound” is a sly and Satanic attempt to associate me with those of negative reputation who have set up “compounds!”

·       A couple bought a lot from my Dad in Florida, when I was an early teen, and I learned much from them. They had been kicked out of the church in Battle Creek for teaching pure truth. But they were not Shepherd’s Rod! They told me that the Lord had impressed them that one day I would do a great work for the Lord. I believe that came true, but Satan is doing all he can, EVEN THROUGH MY OWN FLESH AND BLOOD, to discredit me.

·       My warning message is eternal life saving in all its facets. Some, don’t have the spiritual discernment to see that fact. What is that worth? Everything!

·       My sisters became disgruntled with me because I was not able to furnish bone marrow to one of them who had cancer. I was not physically able to do so, and they turned on me because of that. God and my present wife know that I was not able. I did say that I would take the risk if my sisters would help pay the air flight from Canada to the U.S., but not one of them would help. My wife well knows this to be a fact. Apparently, they then took sides with my daughter because I simply could not afford the trip and because of a malady at the time, preventing me from working. I would have been at high risk myself.

·       My sisters neither were nor now are qualified to know and/or confirm anything about my personal affairs as I lived at a distance from them and rarely saw them. They all turned on me when I separated from the omega of apostasy new movement SDA church, and they have since sided with anything against me whether they knew the facts or not, with the emphasis on NOT! They care little for religion and are all wine bibbers.

·       A couple joined my ministry and said that the Holy Spirit had prompted them to pay off my mortgage. Facts are: They were living in our house at the time rent free. They were going to reside there for about 20 years rent free on a 2,000 sp. ft. Home, until my wife and I retired. Do the math: twenty years times 12 months is 240. 240 times 1000 per month is 240,000. So the couple would have profited 220,000 for their investment if they had stayed. My wife and I said we would receive the money if there were positively no strings attached other than this agreement and than that it would be used to pay the mortgage off which is why they said they were donating it. We honored that agreement. They later proved to be very fanatical, telling their little son that it was Satanic to have fun, allthewhile the mother was a loud, boisterous and bawdy woman who was always laughing in a manner that would hurt ones ears. They tried to take over my ministry and control every move we made. When they found that they could not control me, they left of their own volition. I did not remove them. They were lured to another province by another couple who wanted them in their ministry, so they wanted their money back. I did not have the money to give back as it had been used to pay off the mortgage on the house and property. They specified that it was for that purpose and my wife took it and paid the mortgage off the next day. They had once produced a statement by Ellen White that is would be wrong for any person to give back money that was once pledged to the cause of God, but they then violated that very statement themselves. Since they said the Holy Spirit inspired them to donate the funds, I don’t know why they claim to have been deceived. I taught the very same truth I teach today. They joined forces with the other couple, and that lasted but a short time.

·       My daughter and her husband became disgruntled with me when I insisted that Matthew 22:1-10 had a future fulfillment. They sided with a woman in the church who disagreed with me as well. Later, after they became angry with me and ceased contact with me, I let them know of Ellen White’s statement in Sermons and Talks, Vol. 1, pp. 4-9, where she reapplies Matthew 22:1-10, specifically, to the end time. I never heard from my daughter and her husband, who had vehemently opposed me, again. My daughter Racquelle, and Mike her husband, who was a deacon in the church, have worked against me ever since the inception of my ministry because they do not believe in separation from the church. They have thus spread all manner of falsehood to discredit my name and my ministry.

·       Mat 10:36 And a man's foes [shall be] they of his own household.

·       I say before God Almighty that I have never referred to my children as “my devil children.” My current wife nor anyone will ever be able to prove that because it is a diabolical lie. No one, including God Almighty, has ever heard me refer to my children as devilish, and the thought has never entered my mind until reading this grossly false testimony by my own daughter, flesh and blood.

·       Lynn MacDonald has been a member of my ministry since its inception and she has never heard me say any such thing, and she lives on our property. She has only heard me express sorrow for the way their mother turned my children against me.

·       It is also rumoured that I am having an extra-marital affair with Lynn MacDonald. That is a diabolical lie. I love my wife Shirley with all my heart. Satan is having a field day trying to defame my character because of the serious truths I am teaching.

·       Evidently, my daughter thinks she has great ought against me. Not once has my daughter (or my son’s) ever come to me to obtain my side of the story. This is a total violation of Matthew 18:15-17. They chose to go to the world before ever coming to me to ask my views.

·       I don’t blame my daughter for thinking as she does because that is all she was told by her mother all her life from age 6 and on. I do blame her for not coming to me for my side of the story before going public with such serious false allegations. That would constitute character assassination in any court of the land. All despots resort to character assassination when they cannot prove a message they do not agree with as errant.

·       My daughter is liable for saying things such as I was influenced by the Shepherds Rod. That could not be further from the truth. My first Journal of 80 pages containing all of my message was published before I ever read a thing about the Shepherd’s Rod. They THEN sent me literature because they thought I would be a good prospective convert because I quoted Ellen White’s statement that Ezekiel 9 will be LITERALLY fulfilled BEGINNING AT HIS SANCTUARY, Testimonies, 21l and numerous other quotes by Ellen White.

·       The big turning point in my relationship with my children was when I separated from omega of apostasy new movement Adventism (Selected Messages, Bk, 1, 204-5). Until that time, I had cordial contact with them.

·       Neither my daughter or her husband Mike, have ever been able to refute my warning message, so in hate and discontent, they chose to attack and discredit the messenger. This will place a lot of blood on their shoulders on judgment day. I hereby to agree to post on my Website any rebuttal they may produce to my warning message. This world is about to end. Let us be occupied with the serious truths rather than character assassination.

·       My Son Stephen Jean called me some years ago on the phone. My wife listened on an extension. My Ex had told him that I had wanted her to abort him when she found out she was pregnant. I have never believed in abortion and never even thought such a thing. So I asked him if he had ever caught his mother in a lie. He said yes. I then asked him if he had ever caught me in a lie and he said no. I rest my case. This was her lie to him in an attempt to alienate Stephen from me.

 

Mat 18:15  Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. 

 

 Mat 18:16   But if he will not hear [thee, then] take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. 

 

 Mat 18:17   And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell [it] unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican. 

 

In conclusion: Some believe that having once been errant, and I have erred in some serious ways, that he/she can never be redeemed from sins of the past. Some believe that those who have sinned greatly (in their estimation) cannot make up the bride of Jesus Christ. I have made serious errors in my life, but the second-hand information my daughter has believed as delivered to her by a very proud and face-saving mother, is simply not true and I tell you that against my salvation. But even if it were true, consider this statement by Ellen White:

 

"Nearest the throne are those who were once zealous in the cause of Satan, but who, plucked as brands from the burning, have followed their Saviour with deep, intense devotion. Next are those who perfected Christian characters in the midst of falsehood and infidelity, those who honored the law of God when the Christian world declared it void, and the millions, of all ages, who were martyred for their faith. And beyond is the "great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, . . . before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands." Revelation 7:9. Their warfare is ended, their victory won. They have run the race and reached the prize. The palm branch in their hands is a symbol of their triumph, the white robe an emblem of the spotless righteousness of Christ which now is theirs." E.G. White, The Great Controversy, p. 665.

 

·       I personally presented my warning message to my daughter and two sons as well as my Ex wife. They all rejected it. This has been a source of great grief to me, but what is the Bible’s injunction in such a case:

 

Matthew 19:29   And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life. 

 

Mat 19:30   But many [that are] first shall be last; and the last [shall be] first.

 

Ellen White’s comments on Matthew 19:30 (above) state that those who are made last are not saved. In other words, this verse agrees with Matthew 10:38, which says all who will not meet these tests are not worthy of Christ and will be lost. These are severe tests, but they are God’s, not mine.

 

Mat 10:35   For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. 

 

 Mat 10:36   And a man's foes [shall be] they of his own household. 

 

 Mat 10:37   He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. 

 

 Mat 10:38   And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me. 

 

If we are not willing to forsake all of the above for Christ Jesus, we are not worthy of Him, and that means we will not be saved.

 

Here is my daughter’s testimony against me. By the way, Eugene Shubert (alias Shubee) has claimed to be a prophet.

 

My daughter has to reach back 36 years when she was 6 years old, in an effort to drum up charges that are grossly errant on every point she cites. The reason for the errors is because she believed the vitriolic poison of lies her mother successfully instilled in her. It is indeed rather difficult to apologize and make amends for things one is wrongfully accused of. My current wife of 30 years researched my background very thoroughly before she married me, as did an SDA minister, and we all can assure you that the accusations of my daughter are false and were carefully tailored by her immoral mother to ensure my children would reject me after her death from breast cancer a number of years ago.  It was gross immorality and sinful for my daughter’s mother to tell such hideous lies about me, and it is just as immoral and sinful for my daughter to repeat those lies to the world without even coming to me for my side of the story, which she has never heard or sought out. It is just as immoral for my daughters husband Mike to encourage her and/or permit her to make such lying statements without hearing my side. They both are in violation of Matthew 18 and the commandment not to lie. Ron Beaulieu

 

Shubee wrote:

Ron Beaulieu claims to be a prophet called by the Lord...

As the daughter of Ron Beaulieu, I felt I may have a couple of things to say on this particular topic and some light to shed on the character of my father.
I don't write this in bitterness or in any way to unnecessarily defame my father. I write this in love and concern as I have seen many people deceived and hurt by him with no recourse to help in any way.
I have not spoken to nor had any contact with my father for the past 20 years, due to my father's character and actions.
What my father fails to mention in his biography is that he was married and has 4 children - myself, my 2 brothers, and a half brother whom I've never met.

 

 He was repeatedly almost pathologically unfaithful to my mother, causing her to leave him several times. At one point, while attending Southern Missionary College, my mother became aware of an extramarital affair with a fellow student and left my father to return to her family in Canada. During this separation, my father lied to both his lover and his family, claiming he obtained a divorce from mother. Upon his claims, he and the other women were married (while still be legally married to my mother). All of this information has be related to me by mother and confirmed by my father's sisters. Upon learning that he was still in fact married to my mother, his illegal wife left him, taking their unborn child with her. My mother granted my father a divorce to save he from facing prosecution is the US.
All of these events happened after 1960 'the year Ron was first called by the Lord, to begin the task of exposing the cherished errors of the professing SDA Church.'
Upon his return to immigration to Canada in 1973, my father returned to my mother with the claims that he wanted his family back and that they would be remarried. None of this was true, and in the course of things my father had my mother sell her home supposedly to buy a new larger place for the family but, instead, used the funds to purchase his own place. My mother finally left him for good in 1976. My relationship with him remained difficult and hurtful until I cut all ties with him to keep my children from being influenced or hurt by him in any way.
My father was violent and abusive father to my brothers and a neglectful parent to me.
He sets himself as some kind of prophet, even setting up his own 'compound' about 15yrs ago in Alberta taking tithe and the life savings of his 'followers'. I received a sad phone call one afternoon from a women looking for some information that might help her retrieve the over $20,000 she and her husband had been deceived into turning over to his 'ministry'.
My father was exposed to the teachings of the Shepard's Rod at a young age and the influence their spirit and teachings can been seen in his spirit and teachings.
I believe in forgiveness, redemption and the new birth. I have forgiven my father and I would never bring up a moment of his past if he has in anyway sought restitution form those he has hurt. I cannot judge a man's heart and perhaps my father has truly and sincerely repented of all his sins. I do believe though, that the fruit of that would be seen in humility and the seeking out of those he has sinned against. On the contrary, he continues to blame and cast dispersions on the character of the very ones he has hurt, refusing responsibility, blaming my mother for his infidelity even labelling my brothers and I his 'devil children'.
All I can say is; 'Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.' Matthew7:19-21
Sincerely,
Racquelle Pilon (nee Beaulieu)

 

 

Note by Ron: Solomon had 900 wives and 300 concubines, yet his writings made entry into the Bible. Imagine! What a merciful God we have, but I don't say this to condone or excuse wilful sinning in any way.

 

Some errantly believe that being married more than once disqualifies one to be a prophet of God. If you believe that, expunge the Psalms by David and all accounts of Solomon in Scripture. David was finally accounted as a man after God's own heart. Jacob had two wives and two concubines. So expunge all biblical accounts of him as well. If you believe that anyone who was once most zealous in the cause of Satan, such as Paul, who even killed Christians, cannot be the bride of Christ, then expunge the following from your Great Controversy.

 

I repeat: "Nearest the throne are those who were once zealous in the cause of Satan, but who, plucked as brands from the burning, have followed their Saviour with deep, intense devotion. Next are those who perfected Christian characters in the midst of falsehood and infidelity, those who honored the law of God when the Christian world declared it void, and the millions, of all ages, who were martyred for their faith. And beyond is the "great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, . . . before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands." Revelation 7:9. Their warfare is ended, their victory won. They have run the race and reached the prize. The palm branch in their hands is a symbol of their triumph, the white robe an emblem of the spotless righteousness of Christ which now is theirs." E.G. White, The Great Controversy, p. 665.

 

This should be of great encouragement to all sinners everywhere! In Scripture, there are numerous exceptions to the ideological rules, such as when David took the shewbread from the Tabernacle and ate it.

 

God knew that Waggoner would leave his wife and marry another, an nurse, in England. But that did not disqualify him for delivering the 1888 message of righteousness by faith. God knew that A.T. Jones would join with Kellogg, but that did not disqualify him from delivering the 1888 message. I'm not condoning anyone living a wayward life at some time in his/her experience, but very evidentially, God does not disqualify them even from being nearest Him on His throng. Amazing! Thank you Lord Jesus.

 

It is reasonable to conclude that the bride of Christ is nearest Him on the throne. The other two groups are:

  • The martyrs
  • The great multitude

 

Ron