Published on Friday, November 9, 2001
The New USA PATRIOT Act
Are You a Patriot? by John Kaminski
The USA Patriot Act, now passed and the law of the land, has eliminated the
Constitutional guarantee of probable cause when investigating a crime, and
now allows the police — at any time and for any reason — to enter and
search your house, your files, your bank account — and not even tell you
Are you a patriot? Well, the fact of the matter is, you are whether you
want to be or not. But are you an American or a mindless corporate
stooge? Well, that's another question.
The recent passage and signing of the Patriot Act has effectively
nullified at least six amendments of the Bill of Rights addendum to the U.S.
Constitution. As a result of this, America is longer America, but a
police state, pure and simple. This Patriot Bill is, in fact, a massive
violation of the Constitution it purports to uphold and improve.
Among other things, it mandates that judges give police search warrants
when they ask for them, for any reason. In fact, judges can't deny these
warrants to police, because police don't need a stated reason to ask for
The Bill of Rights is the cornerstone of American freedom. During the
debates on the adoption of the Constitution in the 1790s, its opponents
repeatedly charged that the Constitution as drafted would open the way to
tyranny by the central government. Many states would not have signed the
original Constitution without knowing that these amendments would be
added, according to the federal website which displays the Constitution. These
amendments became known as the Bill of Rights, which Americans have
cherished, protected and fought for for over 200 years.
The Patriot Act rushed through Congress and signed by President George W.
Bush is a major step toward a totalitarian state in which individual liberty is crushed by the whim of police and corporate demagogues masquerading as patriots.
The Patriot Act:
Violates the First Amendment freedom of speech guarantee, right to
peaceably assemble provision, and petition the government for redress of
grievances provision; it violates the First Amendment to the Constitution
three times. More on this below.
Violates the Fourth Amendment guarantee of probable cause in astonishingly major and repeated ways. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution reads: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons of things to be seized." The Patriot Act, now passed and the law of the land, has revoked the necessity for probable cause, and now allows the police, at any time and for any reason, to enter and search your house — and not even tell you about it.
Violates the Fifth Amendment by allowing for indefinite incarceration
without trial for those deemed by the Attorney General to be threats to
national security. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that no person shall be
deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, and the
Patriot Act does away with due process. It even allows people to be kept
in prison for life without even a trial.
Violates the Sixth Amendment guarantee of the right to a speedy and
public trial. Now you may get no trial at all, ever.
Violates the Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment).
Violates the 13th Amendment (punishment without conviction).
Most of the following information is taken from the ACLU's written
objections to Congress before and after the passage of the Patriot Act. My
comments are in brackets [ ].
The Patriot Act does the following (I'm putting the immigration stuff at
the bottom because that least affects most of the people who will be
[It keeps judges out the process and lets cops do what they want (cops
meaning FBI, CIA, etc.)] It minimizes judicial supervision of telephone
and Internet surveillance by law enforcement authorities in anti-terrorism
investigations and in routine criminal investigations unrelated to
terrorism. [Unrelated to terrorism — that means anything. How long do you
think before that includes political dissent? Oops, too late, that's
It expands the ability of the government to conduct secret searches —
again in anti-terrorism investigations and in routine criminal investigations
unrelated to terrorism. [Unrelated to terrorism — that means anything
they want it to mean. If we don't agree with Nazi Republican ideas, they can
now arrest us.]
It gives the Attorney General and the Secretary of State the power to
designate domestic groups as terrorist organizations and block any
non-citizen who belongs to them from entering the country. Under this
provision the payment of membership dues is a deportable offense. [That
means, among other things, that Bush and Ashcroft can decide Greenpeace
and Ralph Nader are terrorists, and under this law, it can put them in jail.]
It grants the FBI broad access to sensitive medical, financial, mental
health, and educational records about individuals without having to show
evidence of a crime and without a court order. [It means they can do what
they want for no good reason, except to persecute and imprison people
with humanistic, noncorporate rip-off views.]
It could lead to large-scale investigations of American citizens for
"intelligence" purposes and use of intelligence authorities to by-pass
probable cause requirements in criminal cases. [Bye bye peace movement.
You're all going to jail; me too.]
It puts the CIA and other intelligence agencies back in the business of
spying on Americans by giving the Director of Central Intelligence the
authority to identify priority targets for intelligence surveillance in
the United States. [This is what America worked so hard for all those years
It allows searches of highly personal financial records without notice
and without judicial review based on a very low standard that does not
require probable cause of a crime or even relevancy to an ongoing terrorism
investigation. [They can do any of this stuff without any reason
whatsoever. This is the kind of freedom these fascists always wanted —
freedom to put everyone who disagrees with them in jail.]
It creates a broad new definition of "domestic terrorism" that could
sweep in people who engage in acts of political protest and subject them to
wiretapping and enhanced penalties. [This means they can jail anyone who
disagrees with them, and keep them in jail for life without a trial.]
On immigration specifically, the new law permits the detention of
non-citizens facing deportation based merely on the Attorney General's
certification that he has "reasonable grounds to believe" the non-citizen
endangers national security. While immigration or criminal charges must
be filed within seven days, these charges need not have anything to do with
terrorism, but can be minor visa violations of the kind that normally
would not result in detention at all. Non-citizens ordered removed on visa
violations could be indefinitely detained if they are stateless, their
country of origin refuses to accept them, or they are granted relief from
deportation because they would be tortured if they were returned to their
country of origin.
It permits the Attorney General to indefinitely incarcerate or detain
non-citizens based on mere suspicion, and to deny readmission to the
United States of non-citizens (including lawful permanent residents) for
engaging in speech protected by the First Amendment. [Or, what used to be the
First Amendment. Now, it doesn't exist.]
Let me just take a bit more of your valuable time to make a couple of
points crystal clear, again using material from the ACLU's objections to
passage of the Patriot Act.
Wiretapping and Intelligence Surveillance
The wiretapping and intelligence provisions in the USA Patriot Act sound
two themes: they minimize the role of a judge in ensuring that law
enforcement wiretapping is conducted legally and with proper
justification, and they permit use of intelligence investigative authority
to by-pass normal criminal procedures that protect privacy. Specifically:
1. The USA Patriot Act allows the government to use its intelligence
gathering power to circumvent the standard that must be met for criminal
wiretaps. Currently FISA surveillance, which does not contain many of the
same checks and balances that govern wiretaps for criminal purposes, can
be used only when foreign intelligence gathering is the primary purpose. The
new law allows use of FISA surveillance authority even if the primary
purpose were a criminal investigation. Intelligence surveillance merely
needs to be only a "significant" purpose. This provision authorizes
unconstitutional physical searches and wiretaps: though it is searching
primarily for evidence of crime, law enforcement conducts a search
without probable cause of crime.
2. The USA Patriot Act extends a very low threshold of proof for access
to Internet communications that are far more revealing than numbers dialed
on a phone. Under current law, a law enforcement agent can get a pen
register or trap and trace order requiring the telephone company to reveal the
numbers dialed to and from a particular phone. To get such an order, law
enforcement must simply certify to a judge — who must grant the order —
that the information to be obtained is "relevant to an ongoing criminal
investigation." This is a very low level of proof, far less than probable
cause. This provision apparently applies to law enforcement efforts to
determine what websites a person had visited, which is like giving law
enforcement the power — based only on its own certification — to require
the librarian to report on the books you had perused while visiting the
public library. This provision extends a low standard of proof — far less
than probable cause — to actual "content" information.
3. In allowing for "nationwide service" of pen register and trap and
trace orders, the law further marginalizes the role of the judiciary. It
authorizes what would be the equivalent of a blank warrant in the
physical world: the court issues the order, and the law enforcement agent
fills in the places to be searched. This is not consistent with the important
Fourth Amendment privacy protection of requiring that warrants specify the
place to be searched. Under this legislation, a judge is unable to
meaningfully monitor the extent to which her order was being used to access
information about Internet communications.
4. The Act also grants the FBI broad access in "intelligence"
investigations to records about a person maintained by a business. The
FBI need only certify to a court that it is conducting an intelligence
investigation and that the records it seeks may be relevant. With this
new power, the FBI can force a business to turn over a person's educational,
medical, financial, mental health and travel records based on a very low
standard of proof and without meaningful judicial oversight.
The ACLU noted that the FBI already had broad authority to monitor
telephone and Internet communications. Most of the changes apply not just
to surveillance of terrorists, but instead to all surveillance in the
United States. [All surveillance. The WTO geeks will love this one. Now
we can be just like China.]
Law enforcement authorities -- even when they are required to obtain
court orders - have great leeway under current law to investigate suspects in
terrorist attacks. Current law already provided, for example, that
wiretaps can be obtained for the crimes involved in terrorist attacks,
including destruction of aircraft and aircraft piracy.
The FBI also already had authority to intercept these communications
without showing probable cause of crime for "intelligence" purposes under
the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. In fact, FISA wiretaps now
exceed wiretapping for all domestic criminal investigations. The
standards for obtaining a FISA wiretap are lower than the standards for
obtaining a criminal wiretap.
The law dramatically expands the use of secret searches. Normally, a
person is notified when law enforcement conducts a search. In some cases
regarding searches for electronic information, law enforcement authorities
can get court permission to delay notification of a search. The USA Patriot
Act extends the authority of the government to request "secret searches" to
every criminal case. This vast expansion of power goes far beyond
anything necessary to conduct terrorism investigations.
The Act also allows for the broad sharing of sensitive information in
criminal cases with intelligence agencies, including the CIA, the NSA,
the INS and the Secret Service. It permits sharing of sensitive grand jury
and wiretap information without judicial review or any safeguards regarding
the future use or dissemination of such information.
These information sharing authorizations and mandates effectively put the
CIA back in the business of spying on Americans: Once the CIA makes clear
the kind of information it seeks, law enforcement agencies can use tools
like wiretaps and intelligence searches to provide data to the CIA. In
fact, the law specifically gives the Director of Central Intelligence -
who heads the CIA -- the power to identify domestic intelligence
The law also creates a new crime of "domestic terrorism." The new offense
threatens to transform protesters into terrorists if they engage in
conduct that "involves acts dangerous to human life." Members of Operation
Rescue, the Environmental Liberation Front and Greenpeace, for example,
have all engaged in activities that could subject them to prosecution as
terrorists. Then, under this law, the dominos begin to fall. Those who provide
lodging or other assistance to these "domestic terrorists" could have their
homes wiretapped and could be prosecuted.
[If you have any doubt that these are the trappings of a police state,
then you need to go back to elementary school and read about the Constitution,
which we no longer have.]
[Fox News Channel reports tonight that 90% of the American people are
really happy with what Bush has done. I think somebody wrote this all in
a book once, that when a free people gave away their freedom, they did it
happily and with much fanfare.]
Ellen White mentioned changes in the Constitution, and you have not seen anything yet!