My Vision on
“Spiritual” & Pulpit Bullies
Time place circumstance -- Time, Place
and Circumstance: "Regarding the Testimonies, nothing is ignored nothing
is cast aside but TIME AND PLACE MUST BE CONSIDERED...Every jot and tittle is
essential and must appear at the opportune time." E.G. White, Selected Messages, vol. 1, p. 57.
Part 2
In a recent video, circa the months of September, October
2018, Andrew Henriques told his hearers that the omega is the pantheism of
Sunday keeping, which in essence is worship of the
Sun, which the leaders are accused of in Ezekiel 8. That is very true, but that
is not all there is to the Omega. The Omega of apostasy began in 1955 with the
adoption of the antichrist teaching that Jesus did not come in the likeness of
sinful flesh.
By making the blanket statement that the Omega is Sunday
worship, the dangerous implication is that there will be no apostasy sufficient to call for separation from the anti-christ new movement until it instructs its members to keep
Sunday, and that is far from the truth.
Ellen White said that the Omega would have to do with the
personality of God and Christ, because that it what the Alpha had to do with,
and the Omega was to involve the Godhead as well as all manner of other
abominations that would wax stronger until Jesus comes.
My angel told me that what Ellen White described as
“kingly power” on the part of the leaders is what he meant by pulpit bullies
and spiritual bullying by the laity who follow the lead of those exercising
“kingly power” over the people.
I was shown that the workers at headquarters of the new
movement learn to know what the leaders want and perform accordingly; that this
is exactly what occurs at General Conference World sessions during voting. All
a “kingly leader” has to do is give a high sign by way of raising an eyebrow,
or a nod of the head, and the underlings will vote as the “king” desires them
to vote, or else. That is where the blackmail element comes into play. In order to retain their jobs, they must vote according to
the wishes of those who sit in the gate deciding what the people will have and
what they should not have.
I will demonstrate how stiff-necked and foolish the
foolish virgin Laodicean can get. Two Walter Veith worshippers wrote to me
inferring that Walter Veith believes that the words “begin at my Sanctuary,”
Ezekiel 9:6, mean all who leave the apostate church in lieu of those who super
glue their bottoms to a pew at the church. Let’s examine that delusion of the
foolish virgins in light of the following weight of
evidence:
"In the very courts of the temple, scenes will be enacted that
few realize. God's people will be proved and tested, that He may discern
'between him that serveth God and him that serveth Him not.' Vengeance will be executed against those who sit in the
gate, deciding what the people should have and what they should not have.
These take away the key of knowledge.
They refuse to enter in themselves, and those who would enter in they hinder.
These bear not the seal of the living God. All who now occupy responsible positions should be
solemnly and terribly afraid lest in this time they shall be found as
unfaithful stewards." E.G. White, Manuscript 15, 1886, Paulson
Collection, p. 55.
· It all begins in the very
COURTS OF THE TEMPLE, and that is exactly where it all began in the TYPE of
A.D. 79.
· Vengeance is executed first
against those who SIT IN THE GATE deciding what the people should and should
not have. That refers to the leaders WHO ALLOW NOTHING TO STAND IN THEIR WAY. 1
SM 204-205.
· It is the leaders who take
away the key of knowledge which the SOP defines as FAITH THAT WORKS BY LOVE FOR
CHRIST. The leaders are teaching that we cannot keep the commandments and that there
will be no LGT (LAST GENERATION THEOLOGY), or perfection of a final remnant as
Revelation 14:1-5 describes the 144,000—WITHOUT FAULT.
· The context is about ALL WHO
NOW OCCUPY RESPONSIBLE POSITIONS (THE LEADERS). This is irrefutable. Yet there
are foolish virgins extolling Walter Veith’s adamant
lie that we should super glue our der·ri·ère’s to
a pew. The result of that will place the MEMBERS as victims of the next literal
Ezekiel 9 slaughter of men, maidens and little children.
· If Ezekiel 9 began with only
the unfaithful who had left the church, why would it involve the slaughter of
“little children” WHO ARE NOT ACOUNTABLE, and who will not leave the church on
their own. The fact is that Ellen White says little children will be saved or
not by whether or not their parent(s) is/ are saved.
The parents remain in the church with their little children and all are
slaughtered together just as was the case in A.D. 70. In fact. Some parents
were eating their children. GC, Chapter 1 and Josephus on the A.D. 70 Jerusalem
War.
Thus, by my vision the Holy
Spirit has exposed the folly of Laodicean foolish virgins like Walter Veith,
who teach that Ezekiel 9 involves only those who leave the apostate church. In
the type, all the good left and fled to Pella and were saved. All the bad were
gathered into the midst’s of Jerusalem for slaughter and burning. Ezekiel
22:17-31; Isaiah 37:31, 32, and so it will be LITERALLY again—ONE MORE TIME!
ONE MORE GOING OUT—ONE MORE COMING OUT. This is the clear present truth that
God showed me in vision.
Compare this with Andrew Henriques teaching that
the 144,000 are all Adventists since 1844, who are faithful and have remained
with the church. Andrew Henriques and Walter Veith are MEMBERS of the Omega
apostate SDA new movement, masquerading as the SDA church militant. Thus, all
who follow their lead and support them with the sacred tithe are slated for the
next Ezekiel 9 slaughter, no matter how much truth they mix with their serious
errors.
See this link for the very serious errors Andrew
Henriques is teaching on the 144,000. https://omega77.tripod.com/questionsforhenriques.htm
“Christ
foretold the destruction of Jerusalem, as well as of the temple. His words were
spoken in the hearing of a large number of people; but
when He was again alone, Peter, James, John, and Andrew came to Him, saying,
“Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of Thy coming,
and of the end of the world?
Jesus
did not answer His disciples by taking up separately the destruction of
Jerusalem, and the last great day of His coming. The city of Jerusalem
represented the world, and the utterances regarding its destruction are to be connected with the world’s more terrible destruction. In
speaking of Jerusalem, His prophetic words reached beyond that event to the
conflagration that will take place in that day when the Lord shall rise “out of
His place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity.” The
description of the two events is mingled, and the entire subject is a warning
to those who shall live in the last scenes of earth’s history....The events that took place at
the overthrow of Jerusalem will be repeated.” {ST February 20, 1901}
This is hugely important and teaching. Take special notice of these
words: “In the very courts of the temple scenes will be enacted that few
realize.” Just as in the prefigure of the Jews in A.D. 70, the corporate church
AS A BODY is involved, not just individuals. I point this out because some
MEMBERS of the church are trying to say that Ezekiel 9 is manifested upon
individuals only who leave that church. Were this so, Ezekiel 9 would
not begin “in the very courts of the Temple,” which is exactly where it began
in A.D. 70. It began at the Temple, and then the city of Jerusalem and outlying
parts were destroyed according to Josephus, an eyewitness historian.
Also, there is the fact that Ellen White referred
to the destruction of the Temple and Jerusalem in A.D. 70, as a PREFIGURE
(TYPE), Great Controversy, p. 25. Ezekiel 9 began at God’s Sanctuary
then, and not just “unfaithful” individuals, and so it will be in the next
literal fulfillment of Ezekiel 9, or it would not be LITERALLY FUFLILLED as
Ellen White said it will be.
"Here we see that the church the Lord's sanctuary was the first to feel the stroke
of the wrath of God. The
ancient men, those to whom God had given great light and who had stood
as guardians of the spiritual interests of the people, had betrayed their
trust. They had taken the position that we need not look for miracles and the
marked manifestation of God's power as in former days. Times have changed.
These words strengthen their
unbelief, and they say: The Lord will not do good, neither will He do evil.
He is too merciful to visit His people in judgment. Thus "Peace and
safety" is the cry from men who will never again lift up
their voice like a trumpet to show God's people their transgressions and the house of Jacob their
sins. These dumb dogs that would not bark are the ones who feel the just
vengeance of an offended God. Men, maidens, and little children all perish
together." E.G. White, Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 5, p. 211.
Clearly, Ellen White is NOT speaking of stray,
unfaithful individuals who have left the church as some have recently tried to
tell me (the Walter Veith worshippers I referred to in another document). She
is speaking of: Those who had stood as GUARDIANS [LEADERS] of the spiritual
interests of the people.
· The ancient men, refers to the more elderly leaders; those to whom God had given great
light and who had
stood as guardians of the spiritual interests of the people.
· They [the leaders] had
betrayed their trust.
· The leaders had taken the position that we need
not look for miracles and the marked manifestation of God's power as in former
days.
· IT IS THE GUARDIAN LEADERS WHO
SAY: “Times have changed.” These words strengthen their unbelief, and they say: The Lord will not do
good, neither will He do evil. He is too merciful to visit His people in
judgment. Thus "Peace and safety" is the cry from men who will never
again lift up their voice like a trumpet to show God's people their
transgressions and the
house of Jacob their sins.”
· The leaders she indicts with
UNBELIEF.
· The leaders cry peace and
safety.
· The leaders are dumb-dogs who
will NEVER AGAIN show THE HOUSE OF JACOB their sins.
· In Isaiah 56:10-12, God
defines the “watchmen” as dumb-dogs!
· The dumb-dogs are the ones who
will feel the JUST VENGEANCE of an offended God. But those who follow those
dumb dog leaders will perish with them. “Men, maidens, and little children all perish
together."
God's wrath in vengeance will be executed IN THE
VERY COURTS OF THE TEMPLE, against those who sit in the gate at Washington,
deciding what you and I should have and what we should not have. God gave it to
Ellen White FOR ALL OF US!
What they ellipse is so important that she says
they take away the KEY OF KNOWLEDGE—faith
that works by love. (faith & works).
They refuse to enter the straight way and hinder
those who do—namely the True Reformers.
They will never bear the seal of God. This shows
that those who do not receive the seal of Ezekiel 9 will be slaughtered in the
very courts of the Temple, and not just some who have LEFT the Temple.
It proves that God's vengeance will be executed at
His Sanctuary, exactly like Ezekiel 9:4 and 5T 211 says.
Eze 9:6 Slay utterly
old and young, both maids, and little children, and women: but come not near
any man upon whom is the mark; and begin at my sanctuary. Then they began at the ancient men which
were before the house.
I agree with the following response by Clarence Settle to
Pastor Bill Hugues, except for the BABYLON part. It is flattering the new
movement to call it Babylon, when Ellen White said it is worse than the
heathen, graven image idol worshippers, who do not have advanced knowledge
Adventists are privy to.
Worse than Babylon – "God's professed people
are selfish and self-caring....They are idolaters, and are worse, in the sight
of God, than the heathen, graven-image worshippers who have had no knowledge of
a better way." Testimonies, Vol. 2, 440-442.
The above is a prophetic statement which refers to
how God views His professed people when they go astray from the truth into
apostasy, which never occurred in Ellen White’s time, because she was able to
“MEET” the apostasy that tried to enter while she was alive.
Below I am including the response of Clarence Settle to
Pastor Bill Hughes. Clarence Settle is one of only a faithful few who teaches
corporate responsibility.
A Response to Pastor Bill Hughes 'The
Danger of Extreme Views' by Clarence Settle
“My,
my, what an astonishing turnaround from what you used to preach. I distinctly recall,
just before your departure from Prophecy Countdown, how you showed verse by
verse, scripture by scripture, the connection between Babylon and the
present-day 1SM: 204-5 “NEW ORGANIZATION…NEW MOVEMENT…[Yahuwah]…removed…without
[Yahuwah]” apostate, corrupt, corporate SDA church. In fact, I have a synopsis
of that sermon in my possession. Wasn’t it called “10 Characteristics of
Babylon”? And now you’re ardently defending that very same organization. Would
you please answer this question for me Pastor Hughes? Was what you were
preaching then error and what you are preaching now truth, or are you preaching
error now and were you preaching truth back then? You can’t have it both ways.
Have you seen these statements: “A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.” James 1: 8. “Double-minded men and women are Satan's
best allies. Whatever favorable opinion they may have of themselves, they are
dissemblers. All who are loyal to [Yahuwah] and the truth must stand firmly for
the right because it is right. To yoke up with those who are unconsecrated, and
yet be loyal to the truth, is simply impossible.” RH: 04-19-98.
You
accuse me of being a fanatic, manifesting unsound reasoning, and a spirit of
extreme intolerance toward persons who do not agree with me. Are you aware of
this inspired description of a fanatic? “About this time, fanaticism began to
appear. Some who professed to be zealous believers in the message rejected the
word of [Yahuwah] as the one infallible guide, and, claiming to be led by the
Spirit, gave themselves up to the control of their own feelings, impressions,
and imaginations.” 4SOP: 243. Have I truly manifested those qualities or made
statements to that effect? Please show me where Pastor Hughes. I try to make
sure that my opinions are little expressed and rely wholly on an “It is written
– Thus saith [Yahuwah].” The last thing I want to do is go by my feelings!
Have
you read this: “The people in Noah's day possessed sharp intellects, and they
sought to show, on scientific grounds, that it was impossible for his prophecy
to be fulfilled. Noah was laughed to scorn because of his warnings; he was
regarded as a fanatic. Noah's implicit trust in [Yahuwah] annoyed while it
condemned them; but they could not move this faithful reprover from his position.
[Yahuwah] had given the warning, and that was enough for Noah.” 1 ST: 02-27-79. “But although John was a
messenger of [Yahuwah], not all received his testimony. Many set themselves
against him, and strove to counteract his influence.
They pointed in scorn to his abstemious life, his simple habits, his coarse
garments, and declared that he was a fanatic.”4 RH: 10-18-92.
And
again: “Miller's name was seldom mentioned by the religious press except by way
of ridicule or denunciation. The careless and [irreverent], emboldened by the
position of religious teachers, resorted to opprobrious epithets, to base and
blasphemous witticisms, in their efforts to heap contumely upon him and his
work. The gray-headed man who had left a comfortable home to travel at his own
expense from city to city, from town to town, toiling unceasingly to bear to
the world the solemn warning of the Judgment near, was sneeringly denounced as
a fanatic, a liar, a speculating knave.” GC 88: 336.
I am
hardly worthy to be included among the company of these illustrious champions
of the truth, but we read this prophecy that is being fulfilled before our very
eyes: “Now is our time of peril. Our only safety is in walking in the footsteps
of Christ, and wearing his yoke. Troublous
times are before us. In many instances, friends will become alienated. Without cause men will become our enemies. The motives of the people
of [Yahuwah] will be misinterpreted, not only by the world, but by their own
brethren. [Yahuwah]'s servants will be put in hard places. A mountain will be
made of a molehill to justify men in pursuing a selfish, unrighteous course.
The work that men have done faithfully will be disparaged and underrated,
because apparent prosperity does not attend their efforts. By misrepresentation
these men will be clothed in dark vestments of dishonesty because circumstances
beyond their control made their work perplexing. They will be pointed to as men
that cannot be trusted. And this will be done by members of the church.
[Yahuwah]'s servants must arm themselves with the mind of Christ. They must not
expect to escape insult and misjudgment. They will be called enthusiasts and
fanatics. But let them not become discouraged. [Yahuwah]'s hands are on the
wheel of his providence, guiding his work to the glory of his name. UL: 177
We also
read: “ Now as in former ages, the presentation of a truth that reproves the
sins and errors of the times will excite opposition. "Everyone that doeth
evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light,
lest his deeds should be reproved." John 3:20. As men see that they cannot
maintain their position by the Scriptures, many determine to maintain it at all
hazards, and with a malicious spirit they assail the character and motives of
those who stand in defense of unpopular truth. It is the same policy which has
been pursued in all ages. Elijah was declared to be a troubler in Israel,
Jeremiah a traitor, Paul a polluter of the temple. From that day to this, those
who would be loyal to truth have been denounced as seditious, heretical, or
schismatic.” GC: 458.
Going
on, you state, Pastor Hughes, “His first two ‘evidences’ have no relationship
whatever to his arguments that we must now all leave the Seventh-day Adventist
church. The first has to do with the two angel’s warning to Lot to immediately
leave Sodom. The simple fact is that no two (or more) angels have come to us
with a warning to immediately leave the Seventh-day Adventist church. If this
should happen, the Settle’s reasoning would be sound. Until it does happen his
reasoning is unsound and his conclusion is valid.”
First
of all Pastor Hughes, the point I was trying to make
had to do with the principle of corporate accountability––the fact that if Lot
did not leave his sinful surroundings he would not be spared. Did I fail to
make that point clear enough? You have chosen to totally ignore the entire
premise of the article and place the focus on the events rather than on what
lessons we are to learn from Lot’s experience. But since we’re on this subject,
you state “no angels have come to us with a warning to immediately leave the
Seventh-day Adventist church.” I will
show that you are also mistaken on that issue.
We
read: “It was to SEPARATE the . . . [ ekklesia] of
Christ from the corrupting influence of the world that the first angel’s
message was given.” 4 SP: 231.
Question:
Is the present-day 1 SM: 204-5 “NEW ORGANIZATION…NEW
MOVEMENT…[Yahuwah]…removed…without [Yahuwah]” apostate, corrupt, corporate SDA
church separate from the corrupting influence of the world or not? Obviously,
if it was, then it would not be in apostasy, so since it clearly is, then is
not this angel’s message to be heeded?
The
second angel’s message is “ Babylon is fallen...Come out of her my people.”
Rev. 14: 8. In light of your previously mentioned sermon, and in light of the
fact that according to5T: 211 the plagues prepared for Babylon are going to
fall first on the present 1 SM: 204-5 “NEW ORGANIZATION...NEW
MOVEMENT...[Yahuwah]…removed…without [Yahuwah]” apostate, corrupt, corporate
SDA church, shouldn’t every wise and prudent believer heed this message also?
Again we read:
“The third angel’s message must do its work of separating from the churches a
people who will take their stand on the platform of eternal truth.” Is the present-day 1 SM: 204-5 “NEW
ORGANIZATION...NEW MOVEMENT…[Yahuwah]…removed” apostate, corrupt, corporate SDA
church standing on the platform of eternal truth? Not when it claims to have
the authority to change doctrine and fundamental beliefs and to hold the
authority of the Church manual above the Holy Scriptures––do you deny that I am
stating verifiable facts?
And do
you know who these angels are, Pastor Hughes? We read: “ Time is short. The
first, second, and third angel's messages are the messages to be given to the
world. We hear not literally the voice of the three angels, but these angels in
Revelation represent a people who will be upon the earth and give these
messages.” 1888: 926. “ The angels are represented as flying in
the midst of heaven, proclaiming to the world a message of warning, and
having a direct bearing upon the people living in the last days of this earth's
history. No one hears the voice of these angels, for they are a symbol to
represent the people of [Yahuwah] who are working in harmony with the
universe
of heaven. Men and women, enlightened by the Spirit of [Yahuwah] and sanctified
through the truth, proclaim the three messages in their order.” NL: 61. And again
we read: “ The three angels of Revelation 14 represent the people who accept
the light of [Yahuwah]’s messages and go forth as His agents to sound the
warning throughout the length and breadth of the earth.” 5T: 455.
Pastor
Hughes, since these messages are given “in the last days” when “time is short”
shouldn’t every prudent person who is in the midst of
an apostate organization leave it immediately? And if you have any doubts at
all as to how short time really is, please refer to 2 SM: 36. which mentions
the “celebration” movement as taking place “just before the close of
probation,” and again in EW: 261 which describes the very events you are
resisting and raising your voice against as people leave the fallen churches,
to take their stand with the remnant, now, just “before the plagues shall be
poured out.” Aren’t these two statements synonymous with each other in regard to the time we’re living in, and isn’t this a call
to take action immediately?
In a
correspondence with one of your well-known cohorts he stated that the third
angel’s message did not include the SDA church––of course with nothing but his
own (fanatical) opinion to support it. But if anyone feels that the 3rd angel’s
message excludes the present-day “NEW ORGANIZATION…NEW MOVEMENT…[Yahuwah]…removed…without
[Yahuwah]” apostate, corrupt, SDA church, then he faces a truly significant
conundrum, for he would have that angel in essence saying to all the other
churches “come out of your apostasy into my apostasy––leave your harlot and come
join me with my 8T: 250 harlot! Or if I am mistaken Pastor Hughes, please give
me page and text.
Going
on, it’s very interesting that you totally ignore what Ellen White herself
states and choose instead to quote what her son stated she said when you quote
“During our conversation, I told (a certain lady) how Mother regarded the
experience of the remnant church, and of her positive teaching that [Yahuwah]
would not permit this denomination to so fully apostatize that there would be
the coming out of another church.” Ellen
C. White The Later Elmshaven
Years, Vol. 6, 1905-1915, page 428.
Before
I disprove this statement let me ask you a serious question Pastor Hughes. Was
it [Yahuwah]’s desire that Israel apostatize? Could He have prevented it? This
is probably the most serious issue of this or any dialogue because we’re
talking free will here; we’re talking about the power of choice. We read in DA:
587: “That day had come to Jerusalem. [Yahushua] wept in anguish over the
doomed city, but He could not deliver her. He had exhausted every resource. In
rejecting the warnings of [Yahuwah]’s Spirit, Israel had rejected the only
means of help. There was no other power by which they could be delivered.”
If you
teach and believe that “no matter what the church is going through,” and by the
church you mean the present-day 1 SM: 204-5 “NEW ORGANIZATION…NEW
MOVEMENT…[Yahuwah]…removed…without [Yahuwah]” apostate, corrupt, corporate SDA
church, then you are not preaching the Advent message that [Yahuwah] gave to
His remnant church, you are preaching a denominational ONCE SAVE ALWAYS SAVED
falsehood!
In view
of W. C. White’s statement have you forgotten, or do you choose to ignore this
inspired statement by [Yahuwah]’s messenger which says: “I was confirmed in all
that I had stated in Minneapolis, that a reformation must go through the
churches. Reforms must be made, for spiritual weakness and blindness were upon
the people who had been blessed with great light and precious opportunities and
privileges. As reformers they had come out of the denominational churches, but
now they act a part similar to that which the churches
acted. We hoped that there would not be the necessity for another coming out.”
MS: 1216, pp.5-6.
A
coming out of what Pastor Hughes? The 1844 Millerite
Movement resulted in a coming out of the denominational churches, so the only
rational and logical conclusion that can be reached by this statement is that
Ellen White hoped that there would not be a necessity for a second coming out,
a coming out from the Adventist Church!
In
closing, let us look at the final charge you level against me that “Finally,
Settle seems to be blissfully unaware that according to his ‘logic’ Ellen White
herself is hopelessly lost and condemned to the lake of fire. She knew more
about evils in the church than anyone else did, yet she never separated herself
from the church. That makes her case hopeless, according to Settle’s
reasoning...This is a classic example of unsound reasoning leading to invalid
conclusions.”
I truly
am glad you brought that up Pastor Hughes. Because so
many confused and searching people wonder “Well if the church was so apostate
then why didn’t Ellen White separate from it.” The fact of the matter is that
there was a time when she stated: “I have but very little confidence that
[Yahuwah] is giving these men in positions of responsibility spiritual eyesight
and heavenly discernment. I am thrown into perplexity over their course; and I
desire now to attend to my special work, to have no part in any of their
councils, and to attend no camp meetings, nigh nor afar off. My mind shall not
be dragged into confusion by the tendency they manifest to work directly
contrary to the light that [Yahuwah] has given me. I am done. I will preserve
my [Yahuwah]-given intelligence. My voice has been heard in the different
conferences and at camp meetings. I must now make a change... I shall,
therefore, leave them to receive word from the Bible, in which the principles
upon which they should work are laid down in straight lines...This is the light
given me, and I shall not depart from it.”
Letter W-186 12-2-1902 to Edson and Willie White.
Furthermore,
let us look at some other direct statements she made as we read: “All who are
educated in the office of publication should see there exemplified the
principles of heaven. I would rather lay a child of mine in his grave than have
him go there to see these principles mangled and perverted. The principles of
heaven are to be carried out in every family, in the discipline of every church,
in every establishment, in every institution, in every school, and in
everything that shall be managed.” 1888: 1745.
And again: “The warning is given in the Word, "Some shall depart
from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils."
We now repeat, Parents, keep your children away from Battle Creek. Some of our
medical missionary workers are becoming leavened with infidelity. Specious
heresy has been taking hold of minds, and its threads have been woven into the
pattern of the figure. Who is responsible for giving young men and women an
education that has left a seducing influence upon their minds? One father
writes that of his two children who were sent to Battle Creek, one is now an
infidel and the other has given up the truth. Letters such as this have been
coming from different ones. The warning is given me to give to parents, If your children are in Battle Creek, call them away without
delay.” 20 MR: 66. And again we read:
“But if the influences at Battle Creek shall be in the future what they have
been for several years past, I would warn parents to keep their children from
Battle Creek. There are but few in that large church who have an influence that
will steadily draw souls to Christ. There are many who would, by their example,
lead the youth away from [Yahuwah] to the love of the world.” Test. to church
at Battle Creek: 50.
In
reading these statements how would Ellen White regard the SDA churches and
institutions of today with their aggressive ecumenical emphasis, their
papal-hugging attitude, their modernistic “culturally relevant” Pentecostalism,
their satanically inspired NLP techniques, their persecution in the courts of
the land of those who are simply contending for the faith, and the many, many
other betrayals and conspiracies against the truth? Please tell me Pastor
Hughes; would she be raising her voice in alarm at those who are determined to
have nothing to do with these abominations? Would she, like yourself, be
calling them back in? You would never convince me of that!
Now
Pastor Hughes, you know that in all my dissertations I have always referred to
the present-day 1SM: 204-5 “NEW ORGANIZATION...NEW
MOVEMENT…[Yahuwah]…removed…without [Yahuwah]” apostate, corrupt, corporate
Seventh-day Adventist Church as the church [Yahuwah] is calling His people out
of. Even though the church in Ellen White’s day had apostasies sweeping through
it, it nevertheless still maintained the pillars of our faith, it still held
fast to the fundamental principles of the Advent movement. It was still the
church [Yahuwah] established and ordained, not a NEW ORGANIZATION––the
fulfillment of the omega of apostasy. So to charge me
with the base falsehood that according to my logic “Ellen White herself is
hopelessly lost and condemned to the lake of fire” shows either that you merely
skimmed over my articles and did not grasp their context, or that you are
deliberately trying to twist my words. But you know, everything is written
there on paper for the whole world and universe to see, and if I have truly
expressed what you state, then I insist that you prove it by showing it to me.
As far
as my “intolerant spirit as revealed in a letter to Elder Lawrence Nelson,” in
all honesty, I really sorrow for that dear soul. Here he is in the sunset of
his years, consigning many souls who take his advice to eternal doom by
advising them to stay in the doomed, apostate 5T: 211 structure despite the
statement that says: “The angel is to place a mark upon the forehead of all who
are separated from sin and sinners, and the destroying angel will follow, to
slay utterly both old and young.” 5T: 505. Because Elder Nelson is rejecting
the straight testimony, because he is rejecting the 3rd angel’s message, out of
concern for his soul and the souls of the many that he is leading to
destruction I have taken the time and effort to warn him of the mortal danger
he is in, as I am warning you Pastor Hughes. [Have you read Ezekiel 33: 1-9?]
If you consider that intolerant, then what would you consider loving, not warning
him? Please tell me.
In
Christian concern for your soul,
Sincerely,
Clarence
A. Settle
If you
are not convinced of the BLACKMAIL by SDA leaders, read this very prayerfully: http://www.sdadefend.com/MINDEX-D/wm-850-dennis-appeal.pdf
http://great-controversy-movie.com/blog/?p=1023
In the
Name of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob,
R.
William Beaulieu