biblesky.jpg

 

Another Refutation of the Serious Errors of the Shepherd’s Rod

 

 

Click to go to our Home Page


 

 

 

 

This is yet another expose` of the Shepherd’s Rod errors. Asyria Falls is the owner of the Davidian forum at the following address:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/davidian/?yguid=2379359

 

----- Original Message -----

From: asyriafalls

To: AdventistHotIssues@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 8:21 PM

Subject: Re: [AdventistHotIssues] Re: Revelation 20:5-6


At the resurrection of the wicked after the millennium the wicked live 100 years Isa 65:20. It takes time to prepare for war against the H. City. It does not happpen in a moment. They have to also build the wasted lands munitions plants etc.

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Ron Beaulieu

To: AdventistHotIssues@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 10:38 AM

Subject: Re: [AdventistHotIssues] Re: Revelation 20:5-6

 

Also, Ellen White says:

 

"Jesus lifted the veil from the future life. "in the resurrection," He said, "they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven" [Matt. 22:30]. DA 605 (1898).

 

So the Shepherd's Rod interprets Isaiah 65 so as to CONTRADICT GOD ALMIGHTY AS WELL, let alone Ellen White!

 

Ron

----- Original Message -----

From: Ron Beaulieu

To: AdventistHotIssues@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 10:34 AM

Subject: Re: [AdventistHotIssues] Re: Revelation 20:5-6

 

Here is proof absolute that the Shepherd's Rod misinterprets Isaiah 65:20:   

Here is Isa. 65:23: "They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord, and their offspring with them."

If we apply Isaiah 65:20, which is in full context with v. 23, to after the millennium is over, there would be BRINGING FORTH (BIRTH) in the new heavens and the new earth. Here again, the Rod interprets Scripture to make Ellen G. White a self-contradictory false prophet, for she says:

"There are men today who express their belief that there will be marriages and births in the new earth, but those who believe the Scriptures cannot accept such doctrines" (Medical Ministry 99).

     Isaiah 65:20 implies that there will no more be an infant of days (or infant death). Verse 21 and 22 in context with verse 20, (by the Shepherd's Rod interpretation) would have the wicked as "mine elect" in verse 22!

Revelation

Previous Chapter | Next Chapter

Chapter 20

1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.

2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.

7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,

8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.

9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.

10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are , and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.

12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

 

Adam Clarke's Commentary and the SDA Bible Commentary both state that Isaiah 65 is referring to CONDITIONAL PROMISES TO THE JEWS--CONDITIONAL TO THEIR REFORMATION AND OBEDIENCE after their captivities under Nebuchadnezzar, and a type of New Heaven and Earth the Jews would have experienced if they had obeyed God, and not THE ULTIMATE NEW HEAVEN AND EARTH, though they would have experienced some of the aspects of the final new heaven and earth. Their lifespan had declined to about 70 years. God is saying in Isaiah 65:20 that their children would live to be one hundred (a round number meaning an old age) if they would reform during their captivity under Nebuchadnezzar and obey God's commandments and statutes.

 

Here is what the SDA Bible Commentary says under the world "child" in Isaiah 65:20:

 

     "Child. Heb. na'ar, "a lad," "a youth." The third group, the youth is now mentioned. The statement concerning them parallels those concerning the other groups. The young people, too, would not die until they had lived out the allotted span. The span is here placed at 100 years. Why this particular figure was chosen is not made clear. It was doubtless a round number, and in the time of Isaiah represents a figure well above the average span of life. According to Ps. 90:10, of which Moses is thought to have been the author, man's span was 70 years. A few attained to 80 years. Of the kings of Judah from Rehoboam to Jehoiakim whose approximate length of life can be calculated, the average age at death was about 47 years. An age of 100 years for Isaiah's contemporaries would thus be considerably above the age that the average man hoped to reach.

     The promises here made to Israel on the CONDITION that they would cooperate with the divine program may be compared with the promises to them at the time of the Exodus. At that time the Lord promised to take away all sickness (Deut. 7:15). Upon the fulfillment of the "conditions," the promise was verified to them. "There was not one feeble person among their tribes" (Ps. 105:37; see further COL 288). The same promises of longevity and immunity from suffering were now once again offered Israel, and  upon the same conditions.

     The conditions here described--a spiritually revived Israel at last working in harmony with Heaven's plan, and inheriting a once more productive Palestine (Isa. 65:9, 10)--would have preceded the final eradication of sin and sinners, the resurrection, and subsequent immortality for the righteous. Isaiah is setting forth the steps leading up to these final events as they would have been fulfilled to the nation of Israel.

     With the failure of Israel and the consequent fulfillment of these promises in the Christian church (PK 713, 714), certain features will be altered, but the final climatic event--the new heavens and the new earth, in which dwelleth righteousness--is still the blessed hope of the saints today (2 Peter 3:13; Rev. 21:1, 2). For this the church has long prayed (Matt. 6:10).

 

Accursed. In contrast with the blessings enjoyed by the righteous, the sinner, even should he attain to old age, would be accursed." SDA Bible Commentary, Vol. 4, pp. 333, 334.

 

There would be no purpose in extending the life of sinners for 100 years after the millennium! All of them are SINNERS. It would be superfluous and redundant for Isaiah to say that SINNERS would be accursed! All who are raised for the second death are ACCURSED!

 

Under infant of days in Isaiah 65:20 it says:

 

     "20. Infant of days. That is, an infant who dies being but a few days old. Many expositors have been greatly perplexed over this verse inasmuch as it presupposes the continuance of death and sin at a time when they believe these would have been abolished. The perplexity has been expressed thus: "What is most remarkable in the description is that death and sin are represented as still continuing" (Pulpit). The answer to this problem has already been given (see on v. 17). Isaiah describes the new heavens and the new earth in terms of how these conditions would have been brought about with respect to the nation of   Israel.

     The resurrection and state of immortality would have been preceded by a period in which adherence to the laws of God and cooperation with the divine program would have largely banished sickness and premature death. It is this feature that Isaiah emphasizes in this present verse. His language is poetic, but the general meaning seems clear. His first point of observation is with regard to infant mortality. There would be no infant deaths.

     Filled his days. That is, there would be no premature deaths. Old men would not die until they had lived out their allotted span." ibid., p. 333.

 

Comments on verse 17:

 

"17. I create. In vs. 17-25 Isaiah describes new heavens and a new earth that would have been brought about should Israel heed the messages of the prophets and fulfill the divine purpose following the restoration from captivity. Israel failed: hence, in secondary application, these verses point forward to the new heavens and the new earth to be ushered in at the close of the millennium. However, the description should be understood first in terms of its local setting, and secondary application be made only in the light of what the NT writers and the Spirit of Prophecy have to say regarding the future life (see pp. 35-38). When such a principle of interpretation is followed, the passage presents no problems. However, if attempts are made to apply all details of the passage to the future new heavens and new earth, several difficulties present themselves: (1) According to v. 20, unless the language is to be understood in a highly metaphorical sense, death is still present (see on v. 20), whereas in the heaven and earth of which John speaks there will be no death (Rev. 21:4).

 

Note by Ron: Children would live to be a hundred and then die BEFORE the second death, necessitating A THIRD DEATH! And the same would occur in the case of old men who had fulfilled their days! This is preposterous! End note.

 

Comment on verse 17 continued:

 

     "(2) According to Isa. 65:23 (see comments there) children are still being born. In the heavens and earth to which we look forward those who are "accounted worthy to obtain that world . . . neither marry, nor are given in marriage" (Luke 20:35). The comment on this passage is too clear to be misapplied, "There are men today who express their belief that there will be marriages and births in the new earth, but those who believe the Scriptures cannot accept such doctrines" (Medical Ministry 99).

     (3) According to Isa. 66:23, 24 worshipers on the way to Jerusalem view the carcasses of those who have transgressed against God, whereas according to Rev. 20-22 the fires of the last day completely renovate the earth before it becomes the home of the redeemed....

     There will be new heavens and a new earth, but the manner in which they will be ushered in is somewhat different now tat the purposes of God, instead of being accomplished through Israel, the chosen nation, will be accomplished through the Christian church (see PK 713, 714)." SDA Bible Commentary, Vol. 4, p. 332. (All emphases mine--Ron)

 

Ron's comments: Surely, one must consider the CONTEXT of Isaiah 65, remembering that there were no chapter designations in the original manuscripts. Here is Isa. 65:23:

 

"They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord, and their offspring with them."

 

     Isaiah 65:20 implies that there will no more be an infant of days (or infant death). Verse 21 and 22 in context with verse 20, (by the Shepherd's Rod interpretation) would have the wicked as "mine elect" in verse 22!

 

Ron

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: asyriafalls

To: AdventistHotIssues@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 8:21 PM

Subject: Re: [AdventistHotIssues] Re: Revelation 20:5-6

At the resurrection of the wicked after the millennium the wicked live 100 years Isa 65:20. It takes time to prepare for war against the H. City. It does not happpen in a moment. They have to also build the wasted lands munitions plants etc.

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Print

E-mail