The Importance of the Two Sacrifices Denied by the Trinity Doctrine

Click to go to our Home Page


If any serious Bible student, after a study of the life of Christ and the Godhead, think that the act of Christ in taking upon Himself humanity forever at His Incarnation, was not an eternal sacrifice, such a person is a most non-discerning foolish virgin.

Consider, were you God, which would you rather do: Cumber your divinity with humanity forever, or lay dead three days in a tomb? Which was the most enduring sacrifice? Which was the greater sacrifice? A lot of martyrs have died for their faith, and will have lain a lot more than three days in a tomb. I do not mean to minimize that Sacrifice, because Jesus did have the sins of the world placed on Him, but He recovered from that, rose from the Tomb, as He knew He would, because He told the Jews, "Kill this body and I will raise it up in three days."

The purpose of the Incarnation was of far greater consequence that for Christ to offer a human sacrifice. His Divinity was cumbered FOREVER by His assumption of humanity at His Incarnation. The greatest gift comes from the greatest sacrifice and Ellen White said defined the greatest sacrifice. It was the gift of the life and soul of Christ via His Holy Spirit life and soul. That was His crowing gift--His crowing sacrifice, without which His death on the cross would have been of no avail.

"Christ declared that after his ascension, he would send to his church, as his crowning gift, the Comforter, who was to take his place. This Comforter is the Holy Spirit,--the soul of his life, the efficacy of his church, the light and life of the world. With his Spirit Christ sends a reconciling influence and a power that takes away sin. In the gift of the Spirit [HIS LIFE--THE SOUL OF HIS LIFE], Jesus gave to man the highest good that heaven could bestow.... The Spirit was given as a regenerating agency, and without this the sacrifice of Christ would have been of no avail.... It is by the Spirit that the heart is made pure. Through the Spirit the believer becomes a partaker of the divine nature. Christ has given his Spirit as a divine power to overcome all hereditary and cultivated tendencies to evil, and to impress his own character upon the church." E.G. White, Review and Herald Articles, May 19, 1904, vol. 5, p. 42.

The Spirit was never given before by way of the Incarnation of the Son of God. In that gift His One Eternal Holy Spirit Essence Substance was divested of His humanity and operates independent thereof, as a gift to us. When did that happen? At His Incarnation, to wit:

“Cumbered with humanity Christ could not be in every place personally, therefore it was altogether for their advantage that He should leave them to go to His Father and send the Holy Spirit to be His successor on earth. The Holy Spirit is Himself divested of the personality of humanity and independent thereof. He would represent Himself as present in all places by His Holy Spirit.” E.G. White, (Manuscript Releases Volume 14 (No’s 1081-1135) MR No.1084.

That pre-Incarnated life and soul Holy Spirit of the Son was no cumbered with humanity. And that is the gift He was Incarnated to give us--the non-cumbered Divine Nature Mind of Christ--the life and soul of Christ. And this gift is denied by all Trinitarians because the trinity doctrine makes no provision for the forever sacrifice of Christ as regarded His ONE ETERNAL HOLY SPIRIT LIFE SOUL ESSENCE SUBSTANCE for us by cumbering that LIFE AND SOUL SPIRIT with humanity forever. This was the first and greatest sacrifice of Christ at His Incarnation, and transcends that even of the Cross because Ellen White said that this was the HIGHEST GOOD that heaven could bestow, and Christ's CROWING GIFT, without which His sacrifice on the cross would have been of no avail.

Ellen White says which of the two sacrifices was the greatest gift. However, either one was of no avail without the other, and the trinity doctrine totally voids the cumbering of Christ's divinity forever, so that He had to be divested of His Holy Spirit life and soul, in order to operate independently as a third person Holy Spirit and offer that Spirit life and soul to us. It is Trinitarians who denigrate this gift by believing and teaching a hellish Omega heresy that renders that gift as impossible--never having occurred, and void, because it denies and thereby voids the process by which it accrued--by the eternal death of Christ to His original first estate Being of pure Divinity unnumbered by Humanity before His Incarnation. That life did not die, but Christ as good as died to that life of pure divinity ONLY, by being combined (blended Ellen White says) and cumbered with humanity.

The trinity doctrine negates this HIGHEST and CROWNING gift by saying that the Holy Spirit merely comes via another third person who existed extra to Christ since eternity, instead of this gift consisting of the actual sacrifice of Christ's ONE ETERNAL HOLY SPIRIT LIFE AND SOUL, in that it was divested from His Humanity at the Incarnation and has operated independently thereof ever since. This was an eternal sacrifice, whereas the sacrifice of the cross ended when Christ rose from the tomb.

Ellen White said that the Holy Spirit was divested of the humanity of Christ and operated independent thereof, and that this is a foolish and redundant statement if she is not speaking directly concerning the person of Christ's ONE ETERNAL HOLY SPIRIT ESSENCE, which both the Father and the Son were comprised of since eternity.

“Cumbered with humanity Christ could not be in every place personally, therefore it was altogether for their advantage that He should leave them to go to His Father and send the Holy Spirit to be His successor on earth. The Holy Spirit is Himself divested of the personality of humanity and independent thereof. He would represent Himself as present in all places by His Holy Spirit.” E.G. White, (Manuscript Releases Volume 14 (No’s 1081-1135) MR No.1084.

The professing SDA Church has taught this diabolical Omega Heresy since 1931, when a small group of men under the leadership of LeRoy Froom, foisted this doctrine upon the church while most were unaware of what was occurring. In this act, the church changed leaders without knowing it.

Change Leaders and Know it Not

Change Leaders: "There is manifested on the part of men in responsible positions an unwillingness to confess where they have been in the wrong; and their neglect is working disaster, not only to themselves, but to the churches....You will be left to make mistakes of a similar character, you will continue to lack wisdom, and will can sin righteousness and righteousness sin. The multitude of deceptions that will prevail in these last days will encircle you, and you will change leaders, and not know that you have done so." E.G. White, Review and Herald, Vol.. 2, 448.

Change Leaders: "Men in positions of responsibility are in danger of changing leaders. This I know, for it has been plainly revealed to me." E.G. White, Series B, #2, p. 48.

Change Leaders: "Men who might have stood in clear light, doing valiant service as ministers of the gospel and medical missionaries, have been accepting false theories and sophistries; which originated with the father of lies, and yet they do not realize that they have changed." E.G. White, Special Testimonies, Series B, #7, p. 13-16, November 20, 1905.

Change Leaders: "Satan will set up his hellish banner right in your homes, and you will be so blinded to the real nature of his deceptions that you reverence it as the banner of Christ." E.G. White, The 1888 Materials, p. 505.

Change Leaders: "They will not recognize him [Satan] as their enemy, that old serpent, but they will consider him a FRIEND, one who is doing a good work." Testimonies, vol. 5, p. 294.

Change Leaders: Satan has laid his plans to undermine our faith in the history of the cause and work of God. I am deeply in earnest as I write this. Satan is working with men in prominent positions to sweep away the foundation of our faith. Shall we allow this to be done, brethren?" E.G. White, Review and Herald, Nov. 19, 1903.

Change Leaders if Mistakes are not Admitted and Changed: "If when the Lord reveals your errors you do not repent or make confession, his providence will bring you over the ground again and again. You will be left to make mistakes of a similar character, you will continue to lack wisdom, and will call sin righteousness, and righteousness sin. The multitude of deceptions that will prevail in these last days will encircle you, and you will CHANGE LEADERS, AND NOT KNOW THAT YOU HAVE DONE SO." E.G. White, Review and Herald, vol. 2, p. 449.

Change Leaders: "Satan has COME IN with his specious temptations, and has led the professed followers of Christ away from the [PILOT] Leader (Christ), classing them with the foolish virgins." Testimonies to Ministers, p. 130.

Change Leaders: "Refusing to follow in the path of obedience, they transferred their allegiance to Satan. The enemy rejoiced in his success in effacing the divine image from the minds of the people that God had chosen as His representatives. Through [ECUMENICAL] intermarriage with idolaters and CONSTANT ASSOCIATION WITH THEM [Isa. 8:9-20], Satan brought about that for which he had long been working,--a national apostasy." Fundamentals to Christian Education, p. 449.

Change Leaders: "The recreant priests added licentiousness to the dark catalogue of their crimes; yet they still polluted by their presence the tabernacle of the Lord, and, laden with sin, dared to come into the presence of a holy God. As the men of Israel witnessed the corrupt course of the priests, they thought it safer for their families not to come up to the appointed place of worship. Many went from Shiloh with their peace disturbed, their indignation aroused, until they at last determined to offer their sacrifices themselves, concluding that this would be fully as acceptable to God, as to sanction in any manner the abominations practiced in the Sanctuary." E.G. White, The Signs of the Times, vol. 1, p. 264, col. 3, December 1, 1881.

George R. Knight on the Trinity Doctrine

"Most of the founders of Seventh-=day Adventism would not be able to join the church today if they had to subscribe to the denomination's Fundamental Beliefs. More specifically, most would not be able to agree to belief Number 2, which deals with the doctrine of the Trinity." George R. Knight, Ministry magazine, October, 1993.

God bless,

Ron Beaulieu