A Straight Testimony to Ulicia
Ulrike Unruh and Teresa Q.
Click to go to our Home PageDear Reader, What follows
is a straight testimony to Ulicia Ulrike Unruh and Teresa Q. It is meant for the benefit of all who
think along the same lines they do to defend an apostate New Movement SDA
church. They have been admonished on these issues more than once, but
continue in lying witness to God’s people. This is a serious act. rwb ----- Original Message ----- From: Ron Beaulieu Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:55 PM Subject: Re: [DefendEGW]
Re: True Reformers by EGW Ulicia, My response
is interspersed under yours. Ron ----- Original
Message ----- From:
Ulicia Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:29 PM Subject: [DefendEGW]
Re: True Reformers by EGW
Ron responds: Ulicia, this very post of yours is another in a
long series of disregard for the truth and direct commandments of God. You
both disregard God's direct requirements on a regular basis by denying the
degree of apostasy in the church and a correct response to that apostasy.
Isaiah 8:9-13 is a direct command of God, and your new movement church is in
gross violation of that commandment. There is one option for disobedience to that command--broken in pieces. You
follow your own desires by defending and supporting a new movement that
violates the strictly forbidden commandment of those verses. Ron responds: Ulicia, you do so with your mouth, but you don't
follow through with your actions. For example, it was not humble or obedience
of you to try to say time after time over many years that Ezekiel 9 was
fulfilled by the Nebuchadnezzar sieges against the Jews. I proved beyond any
reasonable doubt that each of his three invasions were permitted by God as a
remedial lesson to Israel, and DID NOT fulfill Ezekiel 9, because in NONE of
those three sieges was any wholesale slaughter, such as Ezekiel 9 depicts,
perpetrated by Nebuchadnezzar at the Temple in Jerusalem. The Temple was
destroyed, but the Jews were taken captives. They went into captivity, NOT
SLAUGHTER! http://omega77.tripod.com/uliciateres.htm Did you and Teresa demonstrate the true humility you babble
about when I pointed out this irrefutable fact of history? Nay! Neither of
you did! That is not true humility. That is not honesty in dealing. That is
lying. You are still perpetrating that lie until you correct it and repent of
it. And then you propose to sermonize me about
lying. You and Teresa directly lied about this. Neither of you have humbled
yourself to apologize to this date! Then you come on talking humility and
unity at any cost--even at the cost of your lies, which will be another
literal fulfillment of Ezekiel 9 on all who tell such lies without repenting,
AND CONTINUE TO COMMIT THESE ATROCITIES WHILE KNOWING THE TRUTH. Ron responds: You do so by upholding and defending a church
that lightly regards God's Sabbath. It is lightly regarding the Holy Sabbath,
the Midnight Cry and the first and second angel's messages for your new
movement church to hold joint Easter sunrise services with Babylon, making
them think it is quite okay to worship on Sunday, and that desecrates the
Sabbath. Your new movement church is up to its cranium in ecumenical liaison
with Babylon. That desecrates the same messages by making Babylon think it is
okay to keep Sunday because SDA's are aligned with them in their
Associations, Councils, Counsels, Girdings, and
Confederacies. This is proven by your own church leaders in their own news
releases. Ron responds: That is great Ulicia, but apparently your leaders
and the church at large did not do as you did, and you are corporately
responsible for the licentiousness that is in your church and the unholy
practices that have been getting worse and worse since Ellen White's death in
1915. Ron responds: For at least five years now Ulicia (Ulrike) Unruh, you have borne false witness about the historic fulfillment of Ezekiel 9, by saying that chapter was fulfilled by the invasions of Nebuchadnezzar, in lieu of the siege by Titus in A.D. 70. You were dead wrong. I proved from your own SDA Bible Commentary, that this was impossible under Nebuchadnezzar, because in each siege by him the Jews were only taken into captivity. You are absolutely correct Ulicia, and it is thou that has
borne false witness and who supports a church whose leaders have divined lies
to their sheep following members. They have lied about ecumenical involvement
for decades. They claimed only "observer
status" for decades. Then in the latter 1980's, Dr. B.B. Beach admitted
in the Adventist Review that the church had been a MEMBER of the Hungarian
Council of Free Churches, which is a MEMBER of the World Council of Churches.
He did not admit this until the Hungarian revolt of about 1500 members, which
resulted because of the church's ecumenical MEMBERSHIP in that country. Then
the church was forced to admit the truth. The church is STILL a member of the
Hungarian Council of Free Churches and many other Councils of Churches in
various countries of the world. As I already stated, those who violate that strictly forbidden commandment of God, Isaiah 8:9-13, will be broken in pieces. If you will check the marginal definition of the words "a slaughter weapon," it means "a weapon of his breaking in pieces." Ezekiel 9 is the only option for those who KNOWINGLY violate that command after knowing the truth that SDA's know. That is why Ellen White says that Ezekiel 9 will be literally fulfilled again. But you try to allay the danger of that death sentence by pointing out that it occurs during the general destruction. It does occur at that time, but IT BEGINS AT HIS SANCTUARY, Jerusalem, those who knew of the command of Isaiah 8:9-13, and chose to violate it anyway--those like yourselves--Ulicia and Teresa. Ulicia, your husband is a minister and he should have been able
to correct any error of yours which I have mentioned above. But because he
did not, he stands more guilty
than yourself because of his office as a minister to God's people. Ron Ron’s
Commentary: If Ellen White thought that the Sabbath was not as sacredly
regarded as it should be in 1904, what, pray tell, would she think today,
with standard after standard trailing in the dust? --rb
|