Are Both Our Title (Justification) and Our  Fitness (Sanctification) Meritorious Toward Salvation?

Click to go to our Home Page


 

Dear Reader,

Many quote Ellen White’s statement on our title and fitness for heaven as though the title was more essential than our fitness.  They thus create for themselves a most peculiar problem by way of an oxymoron (self-contradiction) which defies the truth concerning the salvific process.  Here is Ellen White’s statement:

 

"The righteousness by which we are JUSTIFIED is imputed; the righteousness by which we are SANCTIFIED is imparted. The first is our title to heaven [Justification], the second is our fitness for heaven [Sanctification]." Messages to Young People 35.

 

Let’s explore a bit more as to what Ellen White meant by the TITLE to heaven:

 

“Those who accept Satan's reasoning are terribly deceived. They accept a position which has no true foundation. God is unchangeable. He is satisfied with nothing short of perfect obedience. Perfection is the only title which will gain admittance to heaven. The law is the only standard of character.” {Ellen G. White, Review and Herald, June 4, 1901 par. 9}

 

Desmond Ford, Karl Wagner and all such teachers of the New Theology (Old lie) in the SDA church, have accepted a position which has no true foundational basis.  This will be clearly proven in the reasoning out of the true foundation below.  However, the New (to Adventism) Theology, is the old lie of Satan, long believed and taught by fallen, mainstream Christianity.  I refer to it as Billy Graham theology—only believe and you are justified--saved, which is the Doctrine of the Nicolaitans which God especially hates:

 

Rev 2:6 But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.


Rev 2:15 So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate.

 

Doctrine of the Nicolaitans.--The doctrine is now largely taught that the gospel of Christ has made the law of God of no effect that by 'believing' we are released from the necessity of being doers of the Word. But this is the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which Christ so unsparingly condemned." E.G. White, The SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 7, p. 957.

 

"(Jude 4).--The Sin of the Nicolaitans.--Is it [our sin] the sin of the Nicolaitans, turning the grace of God into lasciviousness." E.G. White, SDA Bible Commentary, vol. 7, 957.

 

Gnostic Gnosticism

 

"The earliest extra-Biblical Christian writer to mention this party is Irenaeus (c. A.D. 185), who identifies the Nicolaitans as a Gnostic sect...

There is evidence also of a Gnostic sect in the 3d cent. A.D. bearing the name 'Nicolaitans.'

"...The doctrine of the Nicolaitans appears to have been a form of antinomianism (see SDACom 7:957). Nicolaitans of the 2d cent. seem to have continued and extended the views of the 1st-cent. adherents, holding to the freedom of the flesh, and teaching that the deeds of the flesh had no effect upon the health of the soul and consequently no relation to salvation." SDA Bible Dictionary, vol. 8 of the Commentaries, p. 770, 771.

 

A variation is to say, as does Karl Wagner, that the deed of the flesh do have an effect upon the health of the soul, BUT NO RELATION TO SALVATION by his saying that they are not meritorious, when proper works are the workings of Christ’s Divine Nature Holy Spirit in and through us for the purpose of overcoming the lust of the world.  That is blasphemy against Christ’s Divine Nature and its purpose for working in and through us.

 

2Pe 1:4 Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.

 

The exceeding great and precious promises are that the Son of God would die for our sins and then give us His Divine Nature Holy Spirit, as a result of His Incarnation, as a bequeathed gift to us for the purpose (and promise) of regeneration man back to his pre-fall state.

 

"Christ declared [His promise] that after his ascension, he would send to his church, as his crowning gift, the Comforter, who was to take his place. This Comforter is the Holy Spirit,--the soul of his life, the efficacy of his church, the light and life of the world. With his Spirit Christ sends a reconciling influence and a power that takes away sin.

In the gift of the Spirit [HIS LIFE--THE SOUL OF HIS LIFE], Jesus gave to man the highest good that heaven could bestow....

The Spirit was given as a regenerating agency, and without this the sacrifice of Christ would have been of no avail....

It is by the Spirit that the heart is made pure. Through the Spirit the

believer becomes a partaker of the divine nature. Christ has given his Spirit as a divine power to overcome all hereditary and cultivated tendencies to evil, and to impress his own character upon the church." E.G. White, Review and Herald Articles, May 19, 1904, vol. 5, p. 42.

 

"Cumbered with humanity Christ could not be in every place personally, therefore it was altogether for their advantage that He should leave them to go to His Father and send the Holy Spirit to be His successor on earth. The Holy Spirit is Himself divested of the personality of humanity and independent thereof. He would represent Himself as present in all places by His Holy Spirit.” E.G. White, (Manuscript Releases Volume 14 (No’s 1081-1135) MR No.1084.

 

Some, like Desmond Ford and Karl Wagner, teach a self-contradictory modification of the Doctrine of the Nicolaitans—only believe.  They teach that we are saved by forensic (legal), IMPUTED ONLY salvation by faith alone—and that works, even works empowered by the Divine Nature Holy Spirit of Christ, have absolutely NO MERIT toward our salvation.  Their modified variation on the doctrine of the Nicolaitans is that the Nicolaitans teach that there are no works associated with salvation.  Ford and Wagner, however, teach that there are works, but that NO WORKS, even those empowered by the Holy Spirit, have no merit toward salvation.  That is like saying that your title is requisite and meritorious to salvation, but your fitness is not meritorious in any wise. 

 

Is Our Fitness Essential and Meritorious Toward Salvation?

 

It is true that pardon for sin (justification) is a forensic (legal) act ONLY.  But the issue is, are we finally saved by pardon only or justification only?  Was there another greater purpose to the Incarnation to the Son of God than merely providing fire insurance for sinners?  What was the prime purpose in giving sinful man another chance?  Was it merely to pardon sin on a continuum basis, or was it to regenerate man into the character of Christ, by the same process Christ used in overcoming sin and remaining obedient to His Father’s will?

 

Whatever the prime purpose for salvation was, it must relate to the BASIS of salvation or the TITLE.  And what is the basic purpose of salvation?  The basic purpose or objective is revealed in the following Scripture:

 

Hbr 13:21 Make you perfect in every good work to do his will, working in you that which is wellpleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ; to whom [be] glory for ever and ever. Amen.

 

Now, let’s see if Ellen White agrees with God as to the prime purpose or foundation of salvation:

 

“Those who accept Satan's reasoning are terribly deceived. They accept a position which has no true foundation. God is unchangeable. He is satisfied with nothing short of perfect obedience. Perfection is the only title which will gain admittance to heaven. The law is the only standard of character.” {Ellen G. White, Review and Herald, June 4, 1901 par. 9}

 

Yes, Ellen White agrees with God!  Amazing!  Sanctification is the process we go through to perfect us to gain admittance to heaven.  So let’s do a bit of reviewing:

 

"The righteousness by which we are JUSTIFIED is imputed; the righteousness by which we are SANCTIFIED is imparted. The first is our title to heaven [Justification], the second is our fitness for heaven [Sanctification]." Messages to Young People 35.

 

The perfect Righteousness of Christ is imputed justification to our account as down payment (atonement) for our sins.  Then there is the Righteousness of Christ whereby we are sanctified.  That is IMPARTED.  That is His Divine Nature Holy Spirit that is IMPARTED—GIVEN to us as a free grace gift, just as His death for our sins is given to us as a free unmerited grace gift.  Let’s do some more review work to find out what this IMPARTED sanctification or FITNESS GIFT entails.  Why is it given to us?:

 

Hbr 13:21 Make you perfect in every good work to do his will, working in you that which is wellpleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ; to whom [be] glory for ever and ever. Amen.

 

2Th 2:13  But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit AND belief of the truth:

 

From the very beginning of the Everlasting Covenant, we wee chosen to salvation by (through) justification (belief—faith) and sanctification. Both are thus meritorious toward our salvation.

 

"We are saved through the merit of the blood of Christ, but Christ's righteousness does not cover the sin of transgressing God's law, without repentance. We must do all in our power to keep the commandments of God, and then he will impute unto us his righteousness, because we believe in Christ and seek to obey the divine law. This is the reason that Christ came to this world, that he might bring his righteousness to man, that man might lay hold of his strength, and make peace with God. God accepts the efforts of man to keep the law, because Christ imputes his righteousness to him. We could not keep the law in our own strength.  {ST, September 23, 1889 par. 7}

 

The Father send us the life and soul Gift of Christ’s Holy Spirit Divine Nature as an IMPARTED free grace gift for the express purpose of making us perfect in every good work to do His will, working in us that which is wellpleasing in His sight—through Jesus Christ indwelling us by His Divine Nature Holy Spirit gift of grace—unmerited favor.

 

Can you begin to see that to say the free gift of grace via the Divine Nature Holy Spirit of Christ, for working perfection in and through us, IS NOT MERITORIOUS toward our salvation, is blasphemy against that Divine Nature Holy Spirit?  For that is the PRIME PURPOSE OBJECTIVE BASIS OF THE FOUNDATION OF SALVATION.

 

"Perfection of character is attainable by every one who strives for it. This is made the very foundation of the new covenant of the gospel. The law of Jehovah is the tree; the gospel is the fragrant blossoms and fruit which it bears." {AG 141.3}

 

Can the fruit of the tree be separated from the tree or the branches from the vine?  Can the law be separated from God and Christ as being a transcript of their character?  No!  That is why justification provided by the death of Christ, in atonement for the broken law, cannot be separated from the fruit—PERFECTION, worked in and through us by the free grace gift of His Divine Nature Holy Spirit working His perfection in and through us—He being the vine and we the branches!  If He is in us as the Vine, and we are in Him, as the branches, we will bear His fruit, His works, His righteousness, and it is imputed and imparted to us as His righteousness lest any man should boast.

 

The branch cannot be separated from the vine and live, any more than the gospel can be separated from the law and live, for the law is a transcript of God’s character, and under the New Covenant He places His law in our heart (mind).

 

Hbr 10:16 This [is] the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;

 

And here is the context of the above verse:

 

Rom 11:27 For this [is] my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.

 

 


Gal 3:15 Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though [it be] but a man's covenant, yet [if it be] confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.

 

 


Gal 3:17 And this I say, [that] the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

 

 


Hbr 8:6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.

 

 


Hbr 8:7 For if that first [covenant] had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.

 

 


Hbr 8:8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:

 

 


Hbr 8:9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.

 

 


Hbr 8:10 For this [is] the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:

 

 


Hbr 8:13 In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.

 

 


Hbr 9:1 Then verily the first [covenant] had also ordinances of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary.

 

 


Hbr 9:4 Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein [was] the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron's rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant;

 

 


Hbr 10:16 This [is] the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;

 

 


Hbr 10:29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?

 

 


Hbr 12:24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than [that of] Abel.

 

 


Hbr 13:20 Now the God of peace, that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant,

 

Eph 1:5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,

 

Eph 1:9 Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:

 

So we have discovered the PURPOSE, the WILL, the BASIS, of salvation—the will of God, His perfection reproduced in man restoring man to his pre-Adamic state and to the character of Christ.

 

Can we be saved without the fitness to heaven, sanctification?  Karl Wagner has always said no in the past, while at the same time saying that the title (sanctification—works) are not in the least meritorious.  Now here is the self-contradictory (Waterloo) part:  Karl has  said that he "doubts" that one who is not sanctified is justified--saved.  So how does it follow that sanctification by the works of the Holy Spirit is not, according to Karl Wagner and Desmond Ford, meritorious toward our salvation?

 

Weigh the above according to the following salvific process as depicted in Scripture and the Spirit of Prophecy:

 

1.    A measure of faith is FIRST Imparted to all men. But faith without love is not sufficient just as works of faith not motivated by love for God are but our own works.

2.    Faith and LOVE must be purchased FIRST ACCORDING TO MESSAGE TO LAODICEA.

3.    Both Faith and love exercised by some results in acceptable works-- justification--Faith imputed as righteousness, as with Abraham.  So as James says, we are justified by faith and works.  Karl admits this SOMETIMES, when he says that whoever is not sanctified is not justified.

4.    Justification--Imputed when men exercise faith to buy faith and love.

5.    Justification ACCOMPANIES sanctification because Karl admits that justification does not ensue without sanctification.

6.    If justification does not accrue without sanctification, how is faith imputed as righteousness before faith works by love?  For it is THEN that our faith--belief, is imputed unto us as righteousness.  That is exactly how it worked with Abraham ACCORDING TO SCRIPTURE!  James said so also!

7.    In the below post Karl says that faith is imputed FIRST--THEN WORKS are Imparted.

8.    Abraham's belief was demonstrated by works in offering up his son Isaac.  That demonstrated belief was imputed unto him for righteousness.  So how was faith imputed FIRST, [as Karl Wagner maintains it was] without the demonstration of works, sanctification?

9.    Abraham's faith and love for God was FIRST IMPARTED.  He acted upon His faith and love by works.  His faith and love was then IMPUTED UNTO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS

10.Then how does faith without works sanctify?

11.If faith, love and works are required for justification--salvation--why are works the result of being saved, when one is not saved without all three, faith, love and works are imputed unto us as righteousness?

12.All this is why Ellen White could correctly say that we are not saved by commandment-keeping, meaning commandment-keeping ALONE, but neither are we saved WITHOUT commandment-keeping.  She was totally correct.

13.We are saved by faith and love exercised by works which are THEN imputed unto us as righteousness. 

14.The commandment-keeping (sanctification) is as essential to being justified as are faith and love that the commandment-keeping must be based upon--THE FIRST TWO COMMANDMENTS the ten hang upon.

 

Jam 2:23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.

 

Paul agreed: 

 

Rom 4:22 And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness.

 

Rom 4:23 Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him;

 

·       Which came first?  IMPARTED faith and love for God--His title to heaven.

The imparted faith and love were not IMPUTED unto Abraham until after he obeyed God's command.  Then, and then only was His faith that worked IMPUTED unto him as righteousness, for it was the work of Christ in and through Abraham.  But for Abraham's cooperation in receiving faith and love, his faith and love were IMPUTED to him as righteousness even though the righteousness was God's.  This is how God takes away our filthy rag robe and gives us His white robe of His Righteousness.  “God accepts the efforts of man to keep the law, because Christ imputes his righteousness to him. We could not keep the law in our own strength.” {ST, September 23, 1889 par. 7}

·       God imputes His righteousness to us WHEN we obey out of a motive of faith in and love for Him.  That imputing of His righteousness makes our prayers and works perfect in the sight of the Father.

·       New theologists teach that Christ works are imputed to us whether or not we work (Legal, forensic justification only), and that our works are merely fruits of already having been saved, rather than the saving works of Christ’s Holy Spirit working in and through us as meritorious toward our salvation.  Such works are meritorious because Christ imputes his righteousness to such works, just like He did to Abraham’s obedience performed out of faith in and love for God.

·       What proved Abrahams' faith and love?  His work of obedience to God's command.  That proved his fitness for heaven.

·       Would Abraham have been saved without the title and the fitness--justification and sanctification?  No.

·       Is one then as essential as the other?  Yes.

·       Then both are meritorious toward our salvation because both were WORKED IN AND THROUGH ABRAHAM BY THE HOLY SPIRIT OF PROMISE.

 

Always remember ONE THING reader!  Karl Wagner says that he doubts that one is justified unless sanctified!  The only LOGICAL CONCLUSION is that sanctification is then entirely essential to being justified.  Something that is entirely necessary to justification--being saved, is meritorious toward salvation.  Thus, James of Scripture was entirely correct.  We are justified, saved, by faith and love that works.  All are meritorious toward our salvation, ESPECIALLY WHEN ALL ARE WORKED IN AND THROUGH BY CHRIST'S DIVINE NATURE HOLY SPIRIT.

 

I don't merely "doubt" that justification DOES NOT accrue without sanctification.  I KNOW IT DOES NOT!  Therefore, something that is just as essential to salvation as justification, is meritorious toward salvation.  You will see this post again!

 

Remember:  2Th 2:13  But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit AND belief of the truth:

 

James was right—we are saved by faith and works—the works being enabled by Christ if we buy gold tried in the fire—His works wrought in and through us.

 

Jam 2:14 What [doth it] profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?


Jam 2:18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.


Jam 2:22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?


Jam 2:24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.

 

God bless all who search His Word as for hidden Treasure,

 

Ron Beaulieu