Willie White Versus
Isaiah 4:1-4 and 37:31, 32--The Lida Scott Statement
Proof Absolute (From the
Scriptures) of Another Coming Out—Part II "The
Bible for Our Time.--Never are we absent from the mind of God. God is our joy
and our salvation. Each of the ancient prophets spoke less for their own time
than for ours, so that their prophesying is in force for us. 'Now all these
things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our
admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come' (1 Cor. 10:11). 'Not
unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now
reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the
Holy Ghost sent down from heaven which things the angels desire to look into'
(1 Peter 1:12).'" E.G. White, Selected Messages, Bk. 3, p. 338.
Prophets Wrote for Their Own and Our
Day.—“The last books of the Old Testament show us workers taken from
the laborers in the field. Others were men of high ability and extensive
learning, but the Lord gave them visions and messages. These men of the Old
Testament spoke of things transpiring in their day, and Daniel, Isaiah, and
Ezekiel not only spoke of things that concerned them as present truth, but
their sights reached down to the future, and to what should occur in these
last days.”--Letter 132, 1898. {3SM 419.5, 420} Dear Reader, In part one, we firmly
established the fact according to God’s Word, that there is a final coming
out of all formally organized churches. I will speak to that issue a bit more
in this document and then we will move to the next kin issue: When should that final coming out take
place? But first, a few after thoughts on the first issue of whether or not
there is a final coming out. I will begin by restating the Willie White—Lida
Scott statement: "I TOLD HER [MRS. LIDA
SCOTT] HOW MOTHER REGARDED THE EXPERIENCE OF THE REMNANT CHURCH, AND OF HER
POSITIVE TEACHING THAT GOD WOULD NOT PERMIT THIS DENOMINATION TO SO FULLY
APOSTATIZE THAT THERE WOULD BE THE
COMING OUT OF ANOTHER CHURCH."--W. C. White to E. E. Andross,
May 23, 1915, White Estate Correspondence File. {LDE 56.4} In light of Willie White’s alleged statement attributed to his
mother that God would not permit the SDA denomination to so fully apostatize
that there would be the coming out of another church, consider these words in
light of the following statement which we are sure was spoken by Ellen White: "The
enemy of souls has sought to bring in the supposition
that a great reformation was to take place among Seventh-day
Adventists, and that this reformation would consist in giving up the
doctrines which stand as the pillars of our faith, and engaging in a
process of reorganization. Were this reformation to take place, what would
result? The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the
remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed. The
fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years
would be accounted as error. A NEW ORGANIZATION would be established. Books
of a NEW ORDER would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy would be
introduced. The founders of this system would go into the cities, and
do a wonderful work. The Sabbath of course, would be lightly regarded, as
also the God who created it. Nothing would be allowed to stand in the way of
the NEW MOVEMENT. The leaders would teach that virtue is better than vice, but
GOD BEING REMOVED, they would place their dependence on human power, which,
without God, is worthless. Their foundation would be built on the sand, and
storm and tempest would sweep away the structure. Who has
authority to begin such a [NEW] movement? We have our Bibles, we have our
experience, attested to by the miraculous working of the Holy Spirit. We have
a truth that admits of no compromise. Shall we not repudiate everything that
is not in harmony with this truth? E.G. White,
Selected Messages, Vol. 1, 204, 205. I ask you friend, if all of
the following apostasies and heresies have been fulfilled, and they have, has
“another church” been formed “among” (within) the professing Seventh-day
Adventist church? Could anyone do much more to form another church than the
leaders have done by: · Allowing Satan, the enemy of souls, to bring in
the supposition that a great reformation was to take place among
Seventh-day Adventists, and that this reformation would consist in giving
up the doctrines which stand as the pillars of our faith, and
engaging in a process of reorganization to the point that this has actually
been fulfilled. · Allowing
the principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant
church, to be discarded. · Allowing
the SDA religion to be changed. · Allowing the fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last
fifty years to be accounted as error. · Allowing A
NEW ORGANIZATION to be established. · Allowing
books of a NEW ORDER to be written. · Allowing a system of [man’s] intellectual philosophy would be introduced. · Allowing the founders of this system to go into the cities, and do a wonderful
work. · Allowing the Sabbath of course, to be lightly regarded, as also the God who
created it. · Allowing nothing to stand in the way of the NEW MOVEMENT. · Allowing the leaders to teach that virtue is better than vice, but GOD
BEING REMOVED, they would place their dependence on human power, which,
without God, is worthless. · Allowing their foundation to be built on the sand, so that storm and tempest
would sweep away the structure. · Allowing the enemy of souls, Satan, to give leaders the authority to begin such a [NEW] movement? Does
that sound like ANOTHER CHURCH to you? Is it even a church when “God being
removed,” they place their dependence on human power, which without God
is worthless? Ellen White says that only the presence of God can
constitute a church: "God has
a church. It is not the
great cathedral, (or the super mega church), neither is it the national
establishment, neither is it the various denominations; it is the
people who love God and keep His commandments. 'Where two or three are
gathered together in My name, there am I in the midst of them.' Where Christ
is even among the humble
few, THIS IS CHRIST'S CHURCH, for the
presence of the High and Holy One who inhbiteth eternity can alone constitute
a church." The
Upward Look, p. 315. What it all
amounts to is that “another church,” an entirely new movement, new
organization, has formed “among” (within). And we were never to join any new
movement. So SDA’s are joined to “another church,” and don’t even know it!
Ellen White warned that the church would change leaders and know it not: Change
Leaders and Know it Not: Change Leaders:
"There is manifested on the part of men in responsible positions an
unwillingness to confess where they have been in the wrong and their neglect
is working disaster, not only to themselves, but to the churches....You will
be left to make mistakes of a similar character, you will continue to lack
wisdom, and will can sin righteousness and righteousness sin. The multitude
of deceptions that will prevail in these last days will encircle you, and
you will change leaders, and not know that you have done so." E.G.
White, Review and Herald, Vol. 2, 448. Change
Leaders: "Men in positions of responsibility are in danger of
changing leaders. This I know, for it has been plainly revealed to me."
E.G. White, Series B, #2, p. 48. Change
Leaders: "Men who might have stood in clear light, doing valiant service
as ministers of the gospel and medical missionaries, have been accepting
false theories and sophistries which originated with the father of lies,
and yet they do not realize that they have changed." E.G. White, Special
Testimonies, Series B, #7, p. 13-16, November 20, 1905. Change
Leaders: "Satan will set up his hellish banner right in your homes,
and you will be so blinded to the real nature of his deceptions that you
reverence it as the banner of Christ." E.G. White, The 1888
Materials, p. 505. Change
Leaders: "They will not recognize him [Satan] as their enemy, that old
serpent, but they will consider him a FRIEND, one who is doing a good
work." Testimonies, vol. 5, p. 294. Change
Leaders: Satan has laid his plans to undermine our faith in the history of
the cause and work of God. I am deeply in earnest as I write this. Satan
is working with men in prominent positions to sweep away the foundation of
our faith. Shall we allow this to be done, brethren?" E.G. White,
Review and Herald, Nov. 19, 1903. Change
Leaders if mistakes are not admitted and Changed: "If when the Lord
reveals your errors you do not repent or make confession, his providence will
bring you over the ground again and again. You will be left to make mistakes
of a similar character, you will continue to lack wisdom, and will call sin
righteousness, and righteousness sin. The multitude of deceptions that will
prevail in these last days will encircle you, and you will CHANGE LEADERS,
AND NOT KNOW THAT YOU HAVE DONE SO." E.G. White, Review and
Herald, vol. 2, p. 449. Satan has Com In PH086 - Special
Testimony to Battle Creek Church (1898) “The Lord Jesus demands that every soul make a reality of truth. Show
that you believe that you are not half with Christ and half with the world.
Of all such Christ says, "I would thou wert
cold or hot. So then, because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I
will spew thee out of my mouth." He who appreciates the love of Christ,
will be an earnest worker with Christ to bring other souls as sheaves to the
Master. Thorough work is always done by all who are connected with Christ.
They bear fruit to his glory. But indolence and carelessness and frivolity
separate the soul from Christ, and Satan comes in to work his will with the
poor worldly subject, We have a great truth, but through careless
indifference the truth has lost its force upon us. Satan has come in with his specious temptations, and has led
the professed followers of Christ away from their Leader, classing them with
the foolish virgins.” {PH086 23.2} Change Leaders: "Satan has COME IN
with his specious temptations, and has led the professed followers of Christ
away from the [PILOT] Leader (Christ), classing them with the foolish
virgins." Testimonies to Ministers, p. 130. Change Leaders: "Refusing to follow in
the path of obedience, they transferred their allegiance to Satan. The
enemy rejoiced in his success in effacing the divine image from the minds of
the people that God had chosen as His representatives. Through [ECUMENICAL]
intermarriage with idolaters and CONSTANT ASSOCIATION WITH THEM [Isa.
8:9-20], Satan brought about that for which he had long been working,--a
national apostasy." Fundamentals to Christian Education, p. 449. Change
Leaders: "The recreant priests added licentiousness to the dark
catalogue of their crimes yet they still polluted by their presence the
tabernacle of the Lord, and, laden with sin, dared to come into the presence
of a holy God. As the men of Israel witnessed the corrupt course of the
priests, they thought it safer for their families not to come up to the
appointed place of worship. Many went from Shiloh with their peace disturbed,
their indignation aroused, until they at last determined to offer their
sacrifices themselves, concluding that this would be fully as acceptable to
God, as to sanction in any manner the abominations practiced in the
Sanctuary." E.G. White, The Signs of the Times, vol. 1, p. 264,
col. 3, December 1, 1881. Change Ships and Captains Which Ship? Defective
Ship: We can know that if a ship has false teaching it will not survive the
rigors of the ocean of strife and turmoil: "You have had too great
confidence in the ability of these men. A ship may be sound in nearly every
respect but if there is one defect,--a bit of timber worm-eaten,--the lives
of all on board are imperiled." E.G. White, Testimonies, vol. 4, 322. Ship
Drifting at Sea Without Chart or Compass: "The facts concerning the real
condition of the professed people of God, speak more loudly than their
profession, and make it evident that some power has cut the cable that
anchored them to the Eternal Rock, and that they are drifting away to sea,
without chart or compass." E.G. White, Selected Messages, vol. 2, p.
128, (Review and Herald, Vol. 2, p. 231). (Also see Fundamentals of
Christian Education, p. 348). "The people to whom God has
entrusted eternal interests, the depositaries of truth pregnant with eternal
results, the keepers of light that is to illuminate the whole world, have
lost their bearings." Testimonies
to Ministers, p. 397. "Every
ship sailing the sea of life needs to have the divine Pilot on board but when
storms arise, when tempests threaten, many persons push their Pilot
overboard, and commit their bark into the hand of finite man, or try to steer
it themselves. Then disaster and wreckage generally follow, and the Pilot is
blamed for running them into such dangerous waters." E.G. White, Fundamentals
of Christian Education, p. 348. Is the
Pilot on board the SDA New Movement, New Organization Ship described in Selected
Messages, vol. 1, 204-5? Page 205 says He [God] has been removed! Noble
Ship #1: "I lately read of a NOBLE SHIP that was plowing its way across
the sea, when at midnight, with a terrific crash, it struck upon a rock the
passengers were awakened only to see with horror their hopeless condition,
and with the ship they sank to rise no more. The MAN AT THE HELM [VERSUS
CHRIST] had mistaken the beacon light, and hundreds of souls were at a
moment's warning launched into eternity." E.G. White, Selected
Messages, vol. 2, 128. Noble
Ship #2: "There is no need to doubt, to be fearful that the work will
not succeed. God is at the head of the work, and He will set everything in
order. If maters need adjusting at the head of the work, God will attend to
that, and work to right every wrong. Let us have faith that God is going to
carry the noble ship which bears the people of God safely into port."
E.G. White, Selected Messages, vol. 2, 390. Immediately
preceding the above statement is the admonition: "We
cannot now step off the foundation that God has established. We cannot now
enter into any new organization for this would mean apostasy from the
truth.--Manuscript 1290, 1905. Selected Messages, vol. 2, 390. In light
of all the statements involving a ship, we must interpret them all so that
none contradict. The best way to achieve this goal is to look for qualifying
words. In the above statement the qualifying words are NOBLE SHIP and THE
PEOPLE OF GOD. Who are the people of God? Those who keep His commandments and
heed the Laodicean message. There are
many examples to prove that the Selected
Messages, Bk. 1, 204-205 statement (above) has been fulfilled to the letter,
beginning in 1930 with the Trinity Doctrine being smuggled in by Leroy Froom;
the world’s Accreditation Standards being adopted by the church for its
educational institutions, whereby they must teach the curriculum of the
world, thus marrying the youth to the world. Then there was the Evangelical
Conferences of the latter 1950’s and the consequential joining of Babylon’s
Associations, Counsels, Councils, Girdings and Confederacies, which is
strictly forbidden by the Word in Isaiah 8:9-12. Then came the Celebration Movement with it
roots in Pentecostalism and Vatican II. If you have a
particle of a doubt as to the complete fulfillment of all the specifications
of 1SM, 204-5, obtain Dr.’s Colin and Russell Standish’s book entitled Half a Century of Apostasy, The New
Theology’s Grim Harvest, 1956-2006. Just email: remnantherald@optusnet.com.au Or phone 03
5963 7000 But it is
interesting and eternally important that even just ONE of the heresies adopted by the SDA new movement sweeps away
the entire Christian economy, and that is the Trinity Doctrine, Rome’s
Central doctrine. That one
doctrine changes the professing Seventh-day Adventist church into “another
church,” the Synagogue of Satan, and sweeps away the entire Christian economy
by doing away with the Sanctuary and Atonement messages. Those messages are
basic to all Christianity. Rome admits
that this doctrine has no Scriptural basis. Catholics on
Trinity Doctrine -- "The church studied this mystery with great care
and, after four centuries of clarification, decided to state the doctrine in
this way: In the of the Godhead there
are three Persons,--the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit..." (Handbook for Today's Catholic, page
11). "Our opponents [Protestants] sometimes
claim that no belief should be held dogmatically which is not explicitly
stated in Scripture (ignoring that it is only on the authority of the Church
we recognize certain Gospels and not others as true). But the Protestant
churches have themselves accepted such dogmas as the Trinity for which there
is no such precise authority in the Gospels..." (Life Magazine, October 30, 1950, p. 51). The dispute
is not whether or not there are three persons to the Godhead, because there
are three. The real dispute for anyone who believes Ellen G. White, is how and when the third person to the
Godhead accrued to that position. How the Trinity Doctrine Sweeps Away
the Entire Christian Economy "The spiritualistic theories
regarding the personality of God [the
Godhead], followed to their logical conclusion, sweep away the whole Christian economy. They estimate as
nothing the light that Christ came from heaven to give John to give to His
people. They teach that the scenes just before us are not of sufficient
importance to be given special attention. They make of no effect the truth of
heavenly origin, and rob the people of God of their past experience, giving
them instead a false science." E.G. White, 1SM, p. 204. I am going to prove to you that the
Trinity Doctrine of Rome and the SDA version of that doctrine are
spiritualistic theories of man that directly contradict the inspiration gift
of the Holy Spirit to the Adventist church, via one Ellen G. White. Sanctuary Gone Atonement Gone -- "In a representation which
passed before me, I saw a certain work being done by medical missionary
workers. Our ministering brethren were looking on, watching what was being
done, but they did not seem to understand. The foundation of our faith,
which was established by so much prayer, such earnest searching of the
Scriptures, was being taken down, pillar by pillar. Our faith was to have
nothing to rest upon--the sanctuary
was gone, the atonement was gone." E.G. White, The Upward Look, 152. Ellen White
said that the Holy Spirit is the soul of the life of Christ. The issue is:
How is the Holy Spirit a separate and distinct person and at the same time
the soul of the life of Christ? The answer involves the Incarnation sacrifice
of the Son of God in the heavenly Sanctuary, which made the Atonement
possible. "Christ declared that after his
ascension, he would send to his church, as his crowning gift, the Comforter, who was to take his place. This Comforter is the Holy
Spirit,--the soul of his life, the efficacy of his church, the light
and life of the world. With his Spirit Christ sends a reconciling influence
and a power that takes away sin. In the gift of the Spirit, Jesus
gave to man the highest good that
heaven could bestow.... The Spirit was given as a
regenerating agency, and without this the [cross] sacrifice of Christ would
have been of no avail.... It is by the Spirit that the heart
is made pure. Through the Spirit the believer becomes a partaker of the divine
nature. Christ has given his Spirit as a divine power to overcome all
hereditary and cultivated tendencies to evil, and to impress his own
character upon the church." E.G. White, Review and Herald Articles, May 19, 1904, vol. 5, p. 42. "Cumbered
with humanity Christ could not be in every place personally. Therefore it was
altogether for their advantage that He should leave them to go to His Father
and send the Holy Spirit to be His successor on earth. The Holy Spirit is
Himself, divested of the personality of humanity and independent
thereof. He would represent Himself as present in all places by His
Holy Spirit" E.G. White, (Manuscript Releases Volume 14 (No’s
1081-1135) MR No.1084. How and When the Holy Spirit Became the Holy Ghost—The Third
Person of the Godhead It was in the Sanctuary of Heaven
that the Incarnation sacrifice first began. It was there that the Son of God
divested Himself of His Divine only state of being, to forever take humanity
as part of His nature. That divestation of His DIVINE ONLY life and soul, as
a gift to man for overcoming and regeneration back into the image of God,
became the Holy Ghost when that life of His soul was divested from His
humanity, and thus became the third person of the Godhead. Before the divestation of the Son’s
Holy Spirit, the Holy Spirit always existed and was shared by Father and Son
as the ONE eternal Spirit. That ONE
SPIRIT is what makes them one God. The Bible says there is one eternal
spirit: Hbr 9:14 How much more shall the
blood of Christ, who through the
eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience
from dead works to serve the living God?
The eternal Spirit means ONE eternal
Spirit—One God. Eternal Sacrifice of His Divine
(ONLY) Soul "The
apostle would call our attention from ourselves to the Author of our
salvation. He presents before us His two natures, divine and human. . . . He
voluntarily assumed human nature. It was His own act, and by His own consent.
He clothed His divinity with humanity. He was all the while as God, but He
did not appear as God. He veiled the demonstrations of Deity which had
commanded the homage, and called forth the admiration of the universe of God.
He was God while upon earth, but He
divested Himself of the form of God, and in its stead took the form and
fashion of a man. He walked the earth as a man. For our sakes He became
poor, that we through His poverty might be made rich. He laid aside His glory
and His majesty. He was God, but the glories of the form of God He for awhile
relinquished. . . . He bore the sins of the world, and endured the penalty
which rolled like a mountain upon His divine soul. He yielded up His life a
sacrifice, that man should not eternally die. He died, not through being
compelled to die, but by His own free will." E.G. White, SDA Bible
Commentary, Vol. 7a, p. 446. The
mystery part that no man can now explain is how Jesus is fully God and fully
man since He divested Himself of the soul of His life—His Holy Spirit, and
bequeathed it to man as a regenerating agency. "...When
God's people take the position that they are the temple of the Holy Ghost,
Christ himself abiding within, they will clearly reveal Him in spirit,
words and actions that there will be unmistakable distinction between them and
Satan's followers" Notebook Leaflets, p. 79. "The
impartation of the Spirit is the impartation of the life of
Christ" Desire of Ages, p. 805. So what
is the problem with the Trinity Doctrine? That doctrine denies the Sanctuary
Incarnation sacrifice whereby the Son of God divested Himself of His Divine
(ONLY) Nature, to be combined with humanity forever. How does the trinity
doctrine deny this sacrifice made in the Heavenly Sanctuary? The Trinity
Doctrine denies that sacrifice by teaching that the Holy Spirit was always a
separate and distinct person from eternity. Thus, there was no Sanctuary
sacrifice, thus, no atonement, for the atonement for sin on the cross, had to
be predicated by the Sanctuary divestation of the Son’s Holy Spirit soul of
His life, which was to be cumbered by His humanity. If there was no such
Sanctuary sacrificial divestation, then there could have been no atonement on
the cross. That is what Ellen White meant when she said: “The Spirit was given as a regenerating agency, and without this [heavenly sacrifice],
the [cross] sacrifice of Christ would have been of no avail....” Review and Herald Articles, May 19,
1904, vol. 5, p. 42. Review
and Herald Articles, May 19, 1904, vol. 5,
p. 42. The full statement is earlier in this document near the beginning. Why would the cross sacrifice have
been of no avail without the Heavenly Sanctuary divestation sacrifice of His
Holy Spirit Divine Nature for us? Because without that “highest good, crowing sacrifice” man would have no power to
overcome sin and the cross would only pardon a continuum of on-going sin
eternally. So the Trinity Doctrine sweeps away
the entire Christian economy in one feld swoop. Is that “another church?” Is
that the Synagogue of Satan? Did Ellen White Say That the SDA
Church Would Become the Synagogue of Satan? Jesus called the apostate Jewish
church the Synagogue of Satan. Ellen White said that there would be a
COUNTERPART to the Jews and it would take three conditions for any church to
be a counterpart to the Jews: ·
Being a chosen people. ·
Claiming to keep the
commandments of God while not keeping them. ·
Claiming to be the
remnant people of God. Only professing, new movement
Seventh-day Adventists meet all three of those conditions. Here are Ellen
White’s counterpart statements: COUNTERPART: "The Lord
commanded one of his ancient servants, 'Pray not thou for this people [Jer.
7:16 and 11:14], neither lift up cry nor prayer for them neither make
intercession to me for I will not hear thee.' The prophet thus describes the
sins which had called forth this fearful denunciation: 'The prophets prophesy
falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means and my people love to have
it so and what will ye do in the end thereof?' 'From the least of them even
unto the greatest of them, every one is given to covetousness and from the
prophet even unto the priest, every one dealeth falsely. They have healed
also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace,
when there is no peace.' The apostles declare that this state of things will
find its COUNTERPART in the last days. Many have a form of godliness, but in
their daily life deny the power thereof. They have ceased to be convicted of
their sins or alarmed at their state. They say in their hearts, 'The church
is flourishing. Peace and spiritual prosperity are within her borders.' The
words of the prophet may well apply to these self-deceivers, 'They have
chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations. I
also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them."
E. G. White, Second Advent Review and Sabbath
Herald, 11-07-82. "Shall the Lord be compelled to say, `Pray not thou for this
people, neither lift up cry nor prayer for them, neither make intercession to
Me: for I will not hear thee' [Jeremiah 7:16]? `Therefore the showers have
been withholden, and there hath been no latter rain....Wilt thou not from
this time cry unto Me, My Father, thou art the guide of my youth' [Jeremiah 3:3-4]?...
We are to be judged by the light that has been given us,(159) and we
can find no excuse by which to extenuate our course." Review
and Herald, Vol. 3, p 69-70 (August 1, 1893). (Brackets by Ellen White) COUNTERPART: "In the time of the Saviour, the Jews
had so covered over the precious jewels of truth with the rubbish of
tradition and fable, that it was impossible to distinguish the true from the
false. The Saviour came to clear away the rubbish of superstition and
long-cherished errors, and to set the jewels of God's word in the framework
of truth. What would the Saviour do if he should come to us now as he did to
the Jews? He would have to do a similar work in clearing away the rubbish of
tradition and ceremony. The Jews were greatly disturbed when he did this work
[As are SDAs today!]. They had lost sight of the original truth of God, but
Christ brought it again to view. It is our work to free the precious truths
of God from superstition and error." E.G. White, Review
and Herald, Vol. 2,
308.
“The apostles declare that this state of things will find its counterpart in the last days. Many have a form of godliness, but in their daily life deny the power thereof. They have ceased to be convicted of their sins or alarmed at their state. They say in their hearts, "The church is flourishing. Peace and spiritual prosperity are within her borders." The words of the prophet may well apply to these self-deceivers, "They have chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations. I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them." {RH, November 7, 1882 par. 9} Because professing Seventh-day
Adventists have committed the same harlotry as the ancient Jews, God’s first
chosen people, there is another coming out from them just as there was a coming
out from the apostate Jewish church. What is the Type for Another Coming out From Apostate,
Heretical Adventism? God, in His loving mercy, has
actually provided the example for another coming out in the history of the Jews.
In Jeremiah 11:9-15, He enunciates some of the acts that constitute
unpardonable sin. We should be able to reason together that if God says not
to even pray for a people that they have committed unpardonable sin at least
on a generational level. Isaiah 8:9-12, is another place
where God gives no option to a violation to those verses except being broken
in pieces, so stated three times to connote the seriousness of violating
those instructions AFTER knowing the truth and coming out of Babylon. Those are
two examples of unpardonable sin as given in the Word of God. Ellen White also gives an example of
unpardonable sin, to wit: "While
praying at the family altar, the Holy Ghost fell on me, and I seemed to be
rising higher and higher, far above the dark world. I turned to look for the
Advent people in the world, but could not find them--when a voice said to me,
'Look again, and look a little higher.' At this I raised my eyes and saw a
straight and narrow path cast up high above the world. On this path the
Advent people were traveling to the City, which was at the farther end of the
path. They had a bright light set up behind them at the first end of the
path, which an angel told me was the Midnight Cry.
This light shone all along the path, and gave light for their
feet so they might not stumble. And if they kept their eyes fixed on Jesus, who was just before them,
leading them to the City, they were safe. But soon some grew weary, and they
said the City was a great way of, and they expected to have entered it
before. Then Jesus would encourage them by raising his glorious right arm,
and from his arm came a glorious light which waved over the Advent band, and
they shouted Hallelujah! Others rashly denied the light behind them, and said
that it was not God that had led them out so far. The light behind them
went out leaving their feet in perfect darkness, and they stumbled and got
their eyes off the mark and lost sight of Jesus, and fell off the path down
in the dark and wicked world below. It was just as impossible for them to get on the path again and go to the City,
as all the wicked world which God had rejected. They fell all the way along the
path one after another, until we heard the voice of God like many waters,
which gave us the day and hour of Jesus' coming.... By this
time the 144,000 were all sealed and perfectly united. On their foreheads was
written, God, New Jerusalem, and a glorious Star containing Jesus' new
name." E.G. White, Word to the Little Flock,
p. 14. Can we agree that if it becomes impossible to get on the path to
heaven again after violating the Midnight Cry to come out of Babylon and stay
out by way of association, counsel, council, girding and confederacy, Isaiah
8:9-12, then one thereby commits unpardonable sin. Chapter XXIV. - The Second Angel's
Message. “The churches would not receive the
light of the first angel's message, and as they rejected the light from
heaven they fell from the favor of God. They trusted in their own strength,
and placed themselves by their opposition to the first message where they
could not see the light of the second angel's message. But the beloved of
God, who were oppressed, answered to the message, Babylon is fallen, and left
the fallen churches.” {1SG 140.1} “Near the close of the second angel's
message, I saw a great light from heaven shining upon the people of God. The
rays of this light seemed bright as the sun. And I heard the voices of angels
crying, Behold the Bridegroom cometh, go ye out to meet him!”{1SG 140.2} “The
midnight cry was given to give power to the second angel's message. Angels
were sent from heaven to wake up the discouraged saints, and prepare them for
the great work before them. The most talented men were not the first to
receive this message. Angels were sent to the humble, devoted ones, and
constrained them to raise the cry, Behold the Bridegroom cometh, go ye out to
meet him. Those entrusted with the cry made haste, and in the power of
the Holy Spirit spread the cry, and aroused their discouraged brethren. This
cry did not stand in the wisdom and learning of men, but in the power of God,
and his saints who heard the cry could not resist it. The most spiritual
received this message first, and those
who had formerly led in the work were the last to receive and help swell the
cry, Behold the Bridegroom cometh, go ye out to meet him. {1SG 140.3} Chapter XXIV.
- The Second Angel's Message. “The churches would not receive the
light of the first angel's message, and as they rejected the light from
heaven they fell from the favor of God. They trusted in their own strength,
and placed themselves by their opposition to the first message where they
could not see the light of the second angel's message. But the beloved of
God, who were oppressed, answered to the message, Babylon is fallen, and left
the fallen churches.” {1SG 140.1} “Near the close of the second angel's
message, I saw a great light from heaven shining upon the people of God. The
rays of this light seemed bright as the sun. And I heard the voices of angels
crying, Behold the Bridegroom cometh, go ye out to meet him!”{1SG 140.2} Also,
Ellen White said that all who heard and understood the message in 1844, but
who rejected it, experienced a shut door. She never relinquished that aspect
of the shut door. So if folk then could close their probation in 8-12 weeks
in 1844, what about SDA’s now?! "I was shown in vision, and I still believe, that there was a
shut door in 1844. All who saw the light of the first and second angels' messages and
rejected that light were left in darkness. And those who accepted it and
received the Holy Spirit which attended the proclamation of the message from
heaven, and who afterward renounced their faith and pronounced their
experience a delusion, thereby rejected the Spirit of God, and it no longer
pleaded with them." {1BIO 260.8} Now tell me friend, how can SDA’s now violate the second angel’s
message and the Midnight Cry with impunity if those who did it in 1844, after
hearing the truth, rejected the Spirit of God, and it no longer pleaded with
them? "If
those who have been in the church for weeks and months have not learned the
straightness of the way, and what it is to be Christians, and can not hear all the straight
truths of the word of God, it were better that they were cut off from
Israel. It is too late in the day to feed with milk. If
souls, a month or two old in the
truth, who are about to enter the time of trouble such as never was, can not
hear all the straight truth, or endure the strong meat of the straightness of
the way, how will they stand in the day of battle? Truths that we
have been years learning must be learned in a few months by those who now
embrace the Third Angel's Message....There is no need of milk after souls
are convinced of the truth. As soon as the conviction of truth is
yielded to and the heart willing, the truth should have its effect, the truth
will work like leaven, and purify and purge away the passions of the natural
heart. It is a disgrace for those who have been in the truth for
years to talk of feeding souls who have been months in the truth, upon milk.
It shows they know little of the leadings of the Spirit of the Lord,
and realize not the time we are living in. Those who embrace the truth
now will have to step fast. There will have to be a breaking up of
heart before the Lord, a rending of heart, and not the garment."
E.G. White, Manuscript Releases,
vol. 1, p 33-34 (Manuscript 1, February 12, 1854). Ellen White
reapplies Matthew 22:1-10 to our day in Sermons
and Talks, Vol. 1, pp. 4-9. That means that we are to follow the pattern
of when the faithful Jews came out from apostate Jerusalem. Jesus gathered
out the disciples first, Desire of
Ages, 232, as one of the first acts of His ministry in A.D. 27. In A.D.
34, the probation for the Jews was over at the stoning of Stephen which was
commensurate with the ending of the 70 weeks of Daniel 9. At that point,
which was 36 years before the destruction of Jerusalem, and 33 years before
all Christian fled to the mountains of Pella, (SDA Bible Commentary, Vol. 5, pp. 74, 75), the disciples were
gathering folk out of the apostate Jewish church and forming home churches. Why is this history
important? Because it provides a prefigure for what we are to do now, if
Matthew 22:1-10 applies to our time, as Ellen White says it does. The
principles involved are as follows: 1. When probation was over for the Jewish
church, the disciples of Christ began gathering out the faithful. That was
A.D. 34, or 36 years before Ezekiel 9 was literally fulfilled. 2. Ellen White says that Ezekiel 9 will
again be literally fulfilled and that Matthew 22:1-10 applies to our time.
Matthew 22:7 is the same event as Ezekiel 9:6. 3. On page 25 of The Great Controversy, Ellen White says that the words Jesus
spoke to His disciples in warning about the fate of the apostate Jews was
twofold. First, it foreshadowed the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple.
Secondly, it prefigured the terrors
of the last great day at the end of time. So what happened and when it
happened was a prefigure (type) for us to follow, especially since Ezekiel
9:6 and Matthew 22:7 is literally fulfilled
again BEGINNING AT HIS SANCTUARY, the House of Jacob, SDA’s, Testimonies, Vol. 5, 211. 4. In Testimonies, Vol. 5, pp. 451 and
464, Ellen White parallels the
ascension of the Roman soldiers on Jewish soil in A.D. 66, which they
considered the abomination of desolation, with the National Sunday Law. This
is when the Jews were to flee to the mountains AND NOT FROM THE CHURCH, for
they had been leaving the apostate church since A.D. 27 (the disciples, DA
232) and the laity from A.D. 34 and on. 5. Some SDA’s agree with another coming
out, but believe it is to be at the Sunday Law because of Testimonies, Vol. 5, p. 81. But that
is the final time at which the dross (tares, chaff) is removed from all
churches—the last opportunity to respond to the Midnight Cry if you will.
That has nothing to do with separation from apostasy as the prefigure type of
the Jews proves. They were leaving the apostate church and forming home
churches from A.D. 34, the close of their probation, until A.D. 66, when the
abomination of desolation (parallel to the Sunday Law) arrived on Jewish
soil. That was 32 years before what Ellen White parallels with the Sunday law
in 5T 451, 464. So the Sunday law is only the last time to leave apostasy and
is not the only sign to leave. The time to begin to leave is when the
probation of a people is over, and SDA probation ended when they violated the
Midnight Cry and the second angel’s message by joining Babylon’s Ministerial
Associations, Counsels, Councils, Girdings and Confederacies
the world over in the early 1960’s. It then became IMPOSSIBLE to get back on
the pathway to heaven. The new movement was formed at that time. 6. Preparations for the new movement
began in 1930, when Leroy Froom smuggled in the Trinity Doctrine, but it was
not voted on until 1980. That finished the job of sweeping away the entire
Christian economy as far as SDA’s are concerned—or I should say as far as new
movement SDA’s are concerned. 7. What virtue has a new movement
“church” that has “removed God,” (1SM 205) and adopted heresies (The Trinity
Doctrine) that sweeps away the entire Christian economy? 8. And what is far more serious is the
fact that those who remain members of such “another church” after knowing
this truth of its apostasy and heresies, are then corporately responsible for
them and it will then be impossible for them to get back on the pathway to
heaven! Is that what you want? Is this a serious issue? 9. "The plain straight testimony
must live in the church, or the curse of God will rest upon His people as
surely as it did upon ancient Israel because of their sins. God holds His
people, as a body [corporately],
responsible for the sins existing in individuals among them." Testimonies, vol. 3, p. 269. What was soon
to become the new movement (another church) in the early 1950’s by the
sellout to the Evangelicals circa 1955-1957, rejected the message of
corporate responsibility when two ministers, Donald K. Short, and Robert J.
Wieland, presented the truth of that reality to the leaders. They rejected it
out of hand! But the principle of corporate responsibility is found many places
in Scripture, not the least of which is found in the account of Achan in
Joshua chapters 6 and 7. So if you
remain a member after knowing that the church has violated the second angel’s
message and the Midnight Cry light of 1844, it then becomes impossible for
you to get back on the pathway again. Is your position in the church worth
that? Is the social club aspect in the church worth that? Is anything
associated with the church worth that? This is for real folk. The time for
playing church is over. This shaking message is going to the entire church
the world over. Three Africans have been killed by SDA members for giving
this message in that country. This fact was reported to me by Dr. Paul Tulla,
a former SDA seminary professor in Africa. He studied all this out on my
Website and began teaching the truth on the Godhead to his students. He was
fired and he said they stole nearly all his belongings. He is now engaged in
private ministry in Africa. This is now a life and death issue—an eternal
life and death issue! “The future was mercifully veiled from
the disciples. Had they at that time fully comprehend the two awful facts--
the Redeemer's sufferings and death, and the destruction of their city and temple--they
would have been overwhelmed with horror. Christ presented before them an
outline of the prominent events to take place before the close of time. His
words were not then fully understood; but their meaning was to be unfolded as
His people should need the instruction therein given. The prophecy which He uttered was twofold in its meaning; while
foreshadowing the destruction of Jerusalem, it prefigured also the terrors of
the last great day. {GC 25.3} Conclusions on When to Leave · We are responsible for light when we hear it. · If you are reading this document, you
are responsible for this truth NOW. · The probation for the new movement SDA
church was over when it first entered ecumenical liaison in the early 1960’s.
Even the Adventist Review stated in the latter 1980’s that the church had
been members of the Hungarian Council of Free Churches for over 30 years.
That council is in turn a member of The World Council of Churches. About 1500
Hungarian SDA’s protested that membership in Babylon’s confederacy. The new
movement SDA church conspired in secret to enter that violation of God’s
Word, just like the Jews did in Jeremiah 11:9-15. What will you
do with these facts friend of mine? I pray that you will awaken to the
seriousness of all this. What more can be said? If you have any further
questions I would give you all the time you need to in answering your every
question. In His Love, Ron Beaulieu |