Cutting Edge Weekly Newsletter  November 1, 2007


---------- This Weeks Hot News ----------


I. Pastor John Hagee is shockingly telling Jewish audiences that Jesus Christ was not their Messiah!


Now, I can understand why Hagee is so deeply involved with this current Illuminist leadership of Israel, having provided many millions of dollars to current Israel projects, all of which add up to supporting the coming false Jewish Messiah and his new Temple.


Please read these four Archived Headline News Articles which demonstrate that the current leadership of Israel is Illuminist through and through and is leading the Jewish nation to accept the coming Masonic Messiah.










Accurate description of Israeli leadership in Israel: "I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie." [Rev 3:9]


We can also understand why Skull & Bones President Bush encou


rages the Hagee ministry so greatly (Read "What a ‘Night to Honor Israel:’ The CUFI Washington Summit Dinner in DC ", Israpundit, July 20, 2006)


Remember, it is a real problem when a Skull & Bones President praises a Christian minister as highly as President Bush has praised John Hagee over the years. Hagee is greatly responsible for the groundswell of Christian support of Israel, which is not a bad thing until you realize that the thrust of the current Israeli leadership is to set the stage for the Masonic Christ to appear, as NEWS1643, above, clearly shows.


Now, let us review the incredible Hagee message to the Jews -- you did not reject the true Jewish Messiah!


NEWS BRIEF: "A Review of 'In Defense of Israel', by John Hagee", True Discernment, October 22, 2007


"In his book In Defense of Israel (2007), beginning in the section called 'The Jews did not Reject Jesus as Messiah' (p. 132) John Hagee relentlessly twisted Scripture in his attempt to prove that Jesus Christ did not come 'to be Messiah to the Jews'. His denial of Jesus as the Christ (Messiah) cannot be overlooked as a mere 'slip of his pen' because he repeated his assertion 'seven ways from Sunday' as seen in this sample of seven quotes from his book:


• "If God intended for Jesus to be the Messiah of Israel, why didn’t he authorize Jesus to use supernatural signs to prove he was God’s Messiah, just as Moses had done?" (p. 137)
• "Jesus refused to produce a sign … because it was not the Father’s will, nor his, to be Messiah". (p 138)
• "If Jesus wanted to be Messiah, why did he repeatedly tell his disciples and followers to 'tell no one' about his supernatural accomplishments?" (p. 139)
• "The Jews were not rejecting Jesus as Messiah; it was Jesus who was refusing to be the Messiah to the Jews." (p. 140)
• "They wanted him to be their Messiah, but he flatly refused." (p. 141)
• "He refused to be their Messiah, choosing instead to be the Savior of the world" (p. 143)
• "Jesus rejected to the last detail the role of Messiah in word or deed." (p. 145)


"John Hagee’s words directly contradict the central message of the entire New Testament. Indeed, John Hagee’s words directly contradict the fundamental declaration that defines the Christian Faith, which is that Jesus is the Messiah (i.e. the Christ)."


Neither time nor space will allow us here to completely refute these seven serious attacks on the Person, the Office, the Deity of Jesus Christ, and His Truthfulness. On a number of occasions, Jesus boldly stated that He was the prophesied Messiah!


We encourage you to read the full treatise of this subject from our featured article, above, for the author does a credible job in demonstrating the Scriptural heresy of Pastor John Hagee. Remember, this is the pastor who has counseled President Bush that the Book of Esther contains a prophecy which foretells that, at the End of the Age, America will attack Iran. Listen to this quote:


"... the United States must join Israel in a pre-emptive military strike against Iran to fulfill God's plan for both Israel and the West... a biblically prophesied end-time confrontation with Iran, which will lead to the Rapture, Tribulation, and Second Coming of Christ." ("McCain Courts 'Apocalypse Pastor' Hagee", AlterNet, February 23, 2007


My Bible tells me that Ancient Persia (Iran) will join a Russian-led invasion of Israel at the End of the Age (Ezekiel 38-39). Therefore, Iran and Russia both have to be fully-functioning countries for this invasion to occur. An American confrontation with Iran could likely result in a destruction of the Persian state, and a complete embarrassment for Russia's military capabilities. Thus, Cutting Edge has been teaching since the Bush public rhetoric of an attack on Iran began in Summer, 2003, that such an attack will not take place -- precisely because of Ezekiel 38-39.


Pastor Hagee seems to be so solidly in the Republican - Bush political camp that he is mobilizing the support of many millions of undiscerning Christians to support the President in his Iraq, Iran, and Israeli policies.


II. In fact, Christian Evangelical pastors who have preached Republican Party politics from the pulpit are now receiving a strong backlash from their members. I can only say, it is about time!


NEWS BRIEF: "The Evangelical Crackup", By David Kirkpatrick, The New York Times, October 28, 2007


"Immanuel has stood for Southern Baptist traditionalism for more than half a century. Until recently, its pastor, Terry Fox, was the Jerry Falwell of the Sunflower State — the public face of the conservative Christian political movement in a place where that made him a very big deal. Fox roared down from Immanuel’s pulpit about the wickedness of abortion, evolution and homosexuality. He mobilized hundreds of Kansas pastors to push through a state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage ... His Sunday-morning services reached tens of thousands of listeners on regional cable television, and on Sunday nights he was a host of a talk-radio program, “Answering the Call.” Major national conservative Christian groups like Focus on the Family lauded his work, and the Southern Baptist Convention named him chairman of its North American Mission Board."


None of this bothered me, until I read the next paragraph.


"For years, Fox flaunted his allegiance to the Republican Party, urging fellow pastors to make the same 'confession' and calling them 'sissies' if they didn’t. 'We are the religious right', he liked to say. 'One, we are religious. Two, we are right'.”


When I grew up, the pastors of my church railed against the idea that Christians should get involved in politics in any way, shape or form. These men of God based their opposition on two major principles:


1) Jesus warned, "... the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light." (Luke 16:8)


These pastors felt that, if Christian leaders were ever to get into party politics, they would be deceived mightily and would one day discover that they were supporting politicians who were deceivers and who had deceived the Christians who believed in and supported them.


Sadly, events since the founding of Moral Majority have demonstrated that this warning was all too true.


2) Since most politicians were morally suspect and since they insisted upon compromise, Christians who launched themselves into politics would likewise be corrupted.


Sadly, events since the founding of Moral Majority have demonstrated that this warning was all too true.


Now, let us get back to our featured article:


"... when Fox announced to his flock one Sunday in August last year that it was his final appearance in the pulpit, the news startled evangelical activists from Atlanta to Grand Rapids. Fox told the congregation that he was quitting so he could work full time on “cultural issues.” Within days, The Wichita Eagle reported that Fox left under pressure. The board of deacons had told him that his activism was getting in the way of the Gospel ... Fox ... said he saw some impatient shuffling in the pews, but he was stunned that the church’s lay leaders had turned on him. 'They said they were tired of hearing about abortion 52 weeks a year, hearing about all this political stuff!' he told me on a recent Sunday afternoon. 'And these were deacons of the church!' ”


While Cutting Edge is completely against Abortion, there are many more issues which need to be highlighted in this world than just Abortion. Preaching every Sunday about one subject is not what the Apostle Paul wanted pastors to do. Paul counsels all pastors everywhere for all time to preach the whole counsel of God -- preach the entire Word.


This next segment informs us that this trend against political pulpit preaching is spreading.


"Fox is not the only conservative Christian to feel the heat of those battles ... Within three months of his departure, the two other most influential conservative Christian pastors in the city had left their pulpits as well. And in the silence left by their voices, a new generation of pastors distinctly suspicious of the Republican Party — some as likely to lean left as right — is beginning to speak up."


We would like to close this lengthy article with this summation, to which we have alluded, above.


"The phenomenon of theologically conservative Christians plunging into political activism on the right is, historically speaking, something of an anomaly."


American Christians need to get back to preaching the Word of God faithfully and completely and get out of being political activists. When Republican and Democrat Skull & Bones politicians can gain the strong support of people who claim to be Christian and who are faithful in church attendance, something is really wrong with the discernment of these Christians.


Finally, Christians need to return to the practice of reaching conclusion about others by examining their fruits. Jesus told us that we were not to judge, but we were to critically examine a person's life to see whether their life was producing good or evil fruits.


While putting up Daily News Updates, I view over 100 articles per day. When I see President Bush taking an action or making a statement which a genuine Christian would never do, I list that action and/or that quote in my table, "President Bush's Good vs Evil Fruits". Several years ago, I handed this list to a holiness Baptist preacher of over 20 years, and asked him to take the time to read it. He did. He did not question any of the evil fruits, nor could he think of any good fruits which I had not listed. The total was 44 evil fruits and only 3 good fruits. As this preacher handed back the list, he said, incredibly, "I think the jury is still out on whether President Bush is a Born Again Christian"!


This preacher was in a church a lot like the one in Wichita, pastored by Fox. They emphasized heavy doses of political messages from the pulpit, and they loved George Bush. When preachers are this blind, Christians in the pews have no chance of becoming mature, discerning Christians.


Let us hope and pray that this trend continues.


III. In the last newsletter, we explained how the California fires were burning in areas which the UN Biodiversity map listed as either Red (No Human Habitation Allowed) or Yellow (Human Activity Strongly Regulated).


These fires were setting the stage for someone in political power to one day say that Mother Earth (Gaia) was overburdened by our Industrial Civilization, putting her under too much stress. In order to try to relieve this stress, Gaia sends fires, floods, earthquakes, and enormous storms. If mankind does not heed these warnings, Gaia sends stronger fires, floods, earthquakes, and enormous storms. Finally, if man does not change his civilization, Gaia will send a killer storm of such magnitude that man must change. The movies, "The Day After Tomorrow" and "10.5" are strong representations of this New Age - Illuminati doctrine.


If our premise is right, that these fires are planted on the very areas which are designated to be cleared of all human habitation, then we should hear stories which condition people that they need to live elsewhere! This next news story is precisely in this vein. We are also not surprised that this conditioning story appeared in the very Liberal New York Times.


NEWS BRIEF: "Is it time to rethink California fire policy?", By Kirk Johnson and Jesse McKinley, The New York Times


"SAN DIEGO — As Californians sift through the cinders of last week's deadly wildfires, there is a growing consensus that the state's war against such disasters — as it is currently being fought — cannot be won. 'California has lost 1.5 million acres in the last four years', said Richard Minnich, a professor of earth sciences who teaches fire ecology at the University of California, Riverside. 'When do we declare the policy a failure?' "


"The main problem is that many in California are ruggedly obstinate about the choice they have made to live with the constant threat of fire ... If you're going to live in paradise, you're going to have to deal," said Randall Holloman, a bar and restaurant owner in Cedar Glen, which is in an area that has burned twice in four years. In San Diego County, which has borne the brunt of recent fires, three of every four homes built since 1990 are in the dangerous zone where open spaces and housing meet. These are the most vulnerable and exposed places in fire season because wildfires by and large start in national forests, recreation areas and other publicly owned lands."


"As the events of last week illustrate — at least 506,050 acres burned, 1,575 residences destroyed and at least seven people killed — the cycle roars on with higher stakes, greater risk and the grim certainty that it will happen again ... More often than not, the human response after fire is to restore, not relocate ..."


The implication is clear: experts are beginning to say that people need to be willing to relocate elsewhere and stop building and re-building when their property is destroyed by fire. Public conditioning continues apace!


IV. U.S. Secretary of State Rice is preparing a very special trip to the Middle East this next week, to personally hand-deliver invitations to leaders of the nations to attend the November Peace Conference in Annapolis.


This conference will proceed as expected, and it does look as though the beginning date will be November 26.


NEWS BRIEF: "Secretary Rice planning 'Palestine' parley or bust", Jerusalem News Wire, By Stan Goodenough, October 29, 2007


"US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will not take no for an answer and is pushing ahead with plans to host the Bush administration's conference on the creation of Palestine. Billed as an international Middle East peace parley, it is set to take place in Annapolis, Maryland in November. Rice is scheduled to return to Israel early next week, during which time she will likely hand-deliver her invitations to the event."


Remember that no nation will be invited to this Peace Conference who objects to the concept of creating a Palestinian State, carved out of Biblical Israel. Thus, no serious objections will be raised so the summit can proceed to its predetermined goal and be declared a state.


Now, notice the revelation in this next article, that a Palestinian State has been planned as far back as the 1917 Balfour Declaration!


NEWS BRIEF: "Last Call for a Two-State Solution? ", Middle East Online, 11/01/2007


"The two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been on the table since the 1917

Balfour Declaration."


This seemingly innocuous statement is really political dynamite, when you understand the precepts of our recent Headline News Article, NEWS2233, "Modern Israel -- Every 30 Years, In November - From 1917 To 2007!"


The facts of this article reveal that the Illuminati has controlled Israel's events so that an extremely important national event occurs every 30 years -- and always in November -- beginning with the 1917 Balfour Declaration!


Now that we have just learned that the Illuminati planned a Palestinian State in 1917, does this mean that this Peace Conference on this 90th Year and 3rd major event was planned in 1917? I think it means exactly that!


Since this Peace Conference was planned by the Illuminati in 1917, you have to know that its outcome is already set in stone.


V. Even as Turkey continued to breathe out murderous threats against the Kurds, and even though her armed forces continued limited "hot pursuit" raids, the discerning person could see that she was not going to actually invade by force.


NEWS BRIEF: "Iraq, warily eyeing Turkey, says tackling PKK", By Waleed Ibrahim, The Star News Online, November 1, 2007


"BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq said on Wednesday it had set up more checkpoints to restrict the movement of Kurdish guerrillas and cut supply lines to their mountain hideouts following Turkey's demands for firm action against the rebels. Turkey has massed up to 100,000 troops along its rugged border with Iraq, backed up by tanks, artillery, warplanes and helicopters, in preparation for a possible incursion to crush militants of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) there."


As I stated, above, Turkey's government talks a tough fight, but does not actually plan on coming across the border. The Iraqi government is now intently trying to keep the Turkish soldiers on their side of the border by taking this action against the Kurdish rebels. For now, Turkey seems satisfied.


"Baghdad and Washington have urged Ankara to refrain from any major cross-border operation, fearing this could destabilise the whole region ... Turkey's cabinet met in Ankara on Wednesday to discuss the latest clashes between its troops and the PKK along the border and to weigh up whether to impose targeted economic sanctions against groups supporting the rebels."


Please take note of this last sentence: Turkey's leadership is considering economic sanctions against the Kurds!? Since sanctions take many months or years to prove that they never work, the leaders of Turkey have just signaled to the world community that they are not going to actually attack.


Turkey's leaders are even trying to define what action they are really planning to take, and it falls far short of a massive invasion.


NEWS BRIEF: "Turkey: Any Attack on Iraq Not Invasion", Associate Press, November 1, 2007


"ISTANBUL, Turkey (AP) — Turkey tried to allay fears Thursday about its plans for a possible cross-border assault on Turkish Kurd rebels based in northern Iraq, saying such an attack would target guerrilla bases and not amount to an invasion ... Foreign Minister Ali Babacan said if the army crosses the border, it will try to avoid confronting the self-governing Kurdish leadership of northern Iraq."


In other words, Turkey is going to try to avoid bringing down the established Kurdish government which is operating as an autonomous region within the Iraqi government based in Baghdad. This arrangement is exactly what President Bush's New Map foresees - an Iraq split into three autonomous segments officially headquartered in Baghdad.


This situation is, therefore, a "Win-Win" for both sides. Turkey has amassed a massive force on her side of the border as a warning that she will not allow her existing border to be moved one inch from where it is now, while the White House can keep her plan for splitting Iraq into three segments alive.


This next article tells you why the Turks have now waited too long to launch their attack.


NEWS BRIEF: "Quickly approaching Winter limits Turkish army options", Asia Times, By Andrew McGregor, November 1, 2007


"While an attack on northern Iraq seems imminent, important questions are being raised in Ankara about the effectiveness of a cross-border operation ... Snow is already falling in the higher mountain passes. There is a danger that a Turkish winter offensive could get bogged down in difficult and roadless country without the benefit of the Iraqi Kurdish guides that used to accompany Turkish missions against the PKK. As the earth turns to mud under heavy rains and snow, the TSK's armor will find the going difficult. Winter storms could also mean troops on the ground might lose the benefit of air cover and medical-evacuation services."


"The onset of winter usually marks the end of the PKK's campaigning season until spring, as the fighters retire to bases well inside the border while only a small number remains behind in southeast Turkey. The TSK will have to penetrate 20 to 30 kilometers deep into Iraq to get to PKK's winter camps. The alternative would be to create a buffer zone on the Iraqi side of the border and wait until spring for a major offensive."


This reality means that, if Turkey had really been serious about its invasion, it should have struck in mid-July, when they moved 240,000 troops to the border. Every day past that point that they waited made it daily more unlikely that they were ever going to invade this year.


Now, Turkey's Prime Minister is planning to meet President Bush this November 5, which puts the planned invasion off just that much longer -- as the snow continues to fall, plugging up the roads and the passes.


Turkey never intended to invade with massive armed forces. She only intended to amass strong forces on her side of the existing border, sending a signal to Washington, D.C., that she will fight to keep the border right where it is now. She will not allow the New Kurdistan state on President Bush's New Map to push her eastern border backward so that Turkey loses about one-third of her present territory.


Now you know the truth.


May Jesus Richly Bless You,


David Bay, Director