Why Ellen G. White Said “And Thou Seventh-day Adventists Shalt be Brought Down to Hell”

“Of those who boast of their light and yet fail to walk in it Christ says, "But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment than for you. And thou, Capernaum [Seventh-day Adventists, who have had great light], which art exalted unto heaven [in point of privilege], shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works which have been done in thee had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day." Ellen G. White, Review and Herald Articles, Aug. 1, 1893. [THE BRACKETED COMMENTS ARE BY ELLEN WHITE.] {LDE 48.2}

It is a most serious statement for the Spirit of Prophecy to say that if the mighty works which have been done in this Seventh-day Adventists, had been done on Sodom, it would have remained until this day. In other words, if Tyre, Sidon and Sodom had had the knowledge and advanced light Seventh-day Adventists have had, they would have remained and not have been destroyed. That statement is very interesting in light of the church’s current position on the LGBT movement whereby it is electing members of that ilk to be leaders in the church. I was shown that this is one of the reasons SDA’s will be bought down to hell. Another reason that I was shown for which the SDA church will be brought down to hell is its many ecumenical liaisons with Babylon’s ASSOCIATIONS COUNCILS/COUNSELS, GIRDINGS AND CONFEDERACIES and involvement in their conspiracies without informing the SDA membership, and all the lies that have been told to SDA’s over the decades, denying conspiratorial relations with the ecumenists. And violations of Isaiah 8:9-12. Another reason I was shown is all the drama and certain music productions by some churches associated with the corporate SDA churches. Another serious reason I was shown is the fact that the SDA church did indeed form a new organization with books of a new order; that changed pillar doctrines like the human nature of Christ and the Godhead.

"The enemy of souls has sought to bring in the supposition that a great reformation was to take place among Seventh-day Adventists, and that this reformation would consist in giving up the doctrines which stand as the pillars of our faith, and engaging in a process of reorganization. Were this reformation to take place, what would result? The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed. The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A NEW ORGANIZATION would be established. Books of a NEW ORDER would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy would be introduced. The founders of this system would go into the cities, and do a wonderful work. The Sabbath of course, would be lightly regarded, as also the God who created it. Nothing would be allowed to stand in the way of the NEW MOVEMENT. The leaders would teach that virtue is better than vice, but GOD BEING REMOVED, they would place their dependence on human power, which, without God, is worthless. Their foundation would be built on the sand, and storm and tempest would sweep away the structure.

Who has authority to begin such a [NEW] movement? We have our Bibles, we have our experience, attested to by the miraculous working of the Holy Spirit. We have a truth that admits of no compromise. Shall we not repudiate everything that is not in harmony with this truth?" E.G. White, Selected Messages, Bk. 1, 204, 205.

I was shown that it is those most guilty of not sighing and crying for all the abominations who are MOST VEHEMENTLY opposed to Ellen Whites’ clear and plain statements on corporate responsibility. And that if they who will refuse to take those clear statements JUST AS THEY READ, and if they try to destroy them to appease their conscience, and the conscience of the wicked: those who have one that is.

“Mark this point with care; those who receive the pure mark of truth, wrought in them by the power of the Holy Ghost, represented by a mark by the man in linen, are those ‘that sigh and cry for all the abominations that are done’ in the church.” Their love for purity and the honor and glory of God is such, and they have so clear a view of the exceeding sinfulness of sin, that they are represented as being in agony, even sighing and crying. Read Ezekiel, chapter nine." R & H 9-23-1873.

Corporate responsibility:

The Lord said to Joshua, "Neither will I be with you any more,

except ye destroy the accursed from among you." The defects of

character in any member of the church, or in the minister, are

charged to the church if the church make light of the defects. If

you place Elder Daniels over the church as a minister, you, as a

church, assume his defects, you make them your own, and the whole

church stands under the rebuke of God, even as ancient Israel was

under his rebuke on account of the sin of Achan. But your case will

be more grievous than theirs, because you knew the evil, yet hid

your eyes from it and walked contrary to the will of God. {PH028 5.4}

"There are fearful woes for those who preach the truth, but are not sanctified by it, and also for those who consent to receive and maintain the unsanctified to minister to them in word and doctrine." Testimonies, Vol. 1, p 261-62 (see also Testimonies, Vol. 2, p 552).

"The headquarters of our church, affect the whole body of believers. If the physical heart is healthy, the blood that is sent from it through the system is also healthy; but if this fountain is impure, the whole organism becomes diseased by the poison of the vital fluid. So it is with us. If the heart of the work becomes corrupt, the whole church, in its various branches and interests, scattered abroad over the face of the earth, suffers in consequence." Testimonies, vol. 4, p. 210.

"Christ has plainly taught that those who persist in open sin must be separated from the church..." E. G. White, Christ's Object Lessons, 71.

"The plain straight testimony must live in the church, or the curse of God will rest upon His people as surely as it did upon ancient Israel because of their sins. God holds His people, as a body [corporately], responsible for the sins existing in individuals among them." Testimonies, vol. 3, p. 269.

"The names of those who sin and refuse to repent should not be retained on the church books, lest the saints be held accountable for their evil deeds. Those who pursue a course of transgression should be visited and labored with, and if they then refuse to repent, they should be separated from church fellowship, in accordance with the rules laid down in the Word of God." {11MR 208.3}

"Christ has plainly taught that those who persist in open sin must be separated from the church, but He has not committed to us the work of judging character and motive. He knows our nature too well to entrust this work to us. Should we try to uproot from the church those whom we suppose to be spurious Christians, we should be sure to make mistakes. Often we regard as hopeless subjects the very one whom Christ is drawing to Himself, it would perhaps extinguish their last hope. Many who think themselves Christians will at last be found wanting. Many will be in heaven who their neighbors supposed would never enter there. Man judges from appearance, but God judges the heart. The tares and the wheat are to grow together until the harvest; and the harvest is the end of probationary time." COL 71.

Corporate responsibility:

“If wrongs are [BEGIN P.266] apparent among His people, and if the servants of God pass on indifferent to them, they virtually sustain and justify the sinner, and are alike guilty and will just as surely receive the displeasure of God; for they will be made responsible for the sins of the guilty. In vision I have been pointed to many instances where the displeasure of God has been incurred by a neglect on the part of His servants to deal with the wrongs and sins existing among them. Those who have excused these wrongs have been thought by the people to be very amiable and lovely in disposition, simply because they shunned to discharge a plain Scriptural duty. The task was not agreeable to their feelings; therefore they avoided it. {3T 265.2}

“Achan’s sin brought disaster upon the whole nation. For one man’s sin the displeasure of God will rest upon His church till the transgression is searched out and put away. The influence most to be feared by the church is not that of open opposers, infidels, and blasphemers, but of inconsistent professors of Christ. These are the ones that keep back the blessing of the God of Israel and bring weakness upon His people.” {PP 497.2}

“When the church is in difficulty, when coldness and spiritual declension exist, giving occasion for the enemies of God to triumph, then, instead of folding their hands and lamenting their unhappy state, let its members inquire if there is not an Achan in the camp. With humiliation and searching of heart, let each seek to discover the hidden sins that shut out God’s presence.” {PP 497.3}

"Even though you may not be able to speak a word to those who are working on wrong principles, leave them. may do more than words. Nehemiah refused to associate with those who were untrue to principle, and he would not permit his workmen to associate with them. The love and fear of God were his safeguard. Dare to be a Daniel, Dare to stand alone. Thus as did Moses, you will endure the seeing of Him who is invisible. But a cowardly and silent reserve before evil associates, while you listen to their devices makes you one with them Come out from among them and be separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, and will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty." Review & Herald Vol. 4, p. 42.

I was shown that it is particularly offensive to God that the book Great Controversy, written by Ellen G. white has been greatly abridged. Ellen White said Satan tried to kill her while she was writing that book, and any thinking Seventh-day Adventist with spiritual discernment will not wonder why. I was shown that SDA’s are supposed to carry on and further the principles o the Reformation rather than participate in their demise by truncating the book Great Controversy.

Another reason why is the fact that SDA’s are holding joint easter sunrise services with the other churches that keep Sunday sacred.

Another prime reason why Seventh-day Adventists will be brought down to hell, is because of the fact that they will instruct their Members to take the Mark by instructing them to keep Sunday sacred.

Another reason is because some SDA evangelists are teaching the members of the church, NO MATTER WHAT THE CHURCH DOES OR TEACHES; NO MATTER WHAT LATEST ABOMINATIONS the church commits on almost a weekly basis, THE LEADERS instruct the MEMBERS TO REMAIN. Jesus removed the faithful into HOME CHURCHES IN THE TYPE.

Another reason is because the leaders won’t sigh and cry or even admit to committing abominable apostasies..

A church that won’t even admit to committing apostasy cannot repent of and correct such!!!!!! So according to the Laodicean message its Candle will be removed. And that includes being “BROUGHT DOWN TO HELL!! I Was shown THREE TIMES THAT EVERY Seventh-Day Adventist had better pray long and hard about this fact, because the statement involves the corporate church MEMBERSHIP and all the corporate responsibility statements I have cited by Ellen G. White I was shown that certain SDA members and leaders are denying the biblical principle of corporate responsibility to their own damnation. I was shown that the statements are clear and should be taken just as they read. I was show that no true reformer in the cause of God will ever approve of the change in the book Great Controversy, to the Great Hope.

The Thirteen times Satan Tried to Kill Ellen G. White while she wrote the book The Great Controversy.

https://www.prophesyagain.org/single-post/2018/12/09/The-13-Times-Satan-Attempted-to-Kill-Ellen-White-The-Great-Controversy-Over-The-Great-Controversy

Because Satan was unsuccessful in taking the life of God’s messenger and preventing her from completing the greatest of her works, all his pent up, vehement ire is being unleashed against The Great Controversy, and he has found the most unsuspecting of allies in those called upon to declare the messages contained therein and to widely disseminate it.

I was shown that this act of changing the book Great Controversy, was/is enough for God to bring Seventh-day Adventists down to hell, for if they had protested this change like true Protestants should, the book never would have been changed. SDA’s could have written to the Conference that they would no longer pay tithe until the book was/is reinstated! This says it all about SDA leaders who changed the book Great Controversy.

Of all the books that Ellen White has written, yea of all the books ever written, none can parallel that of The Great Controversy. As far as its spiritual, historical and prophetic breadth of knowledge, this book is second only to the Bible. Additionally, no other book unmasks Satan’s strategies and his chief players than The Great Controversy (please read the introduction to the book), as well as how victory over sin through Christ may be attained; and for these reasons Satan tried to kill the author, Ellen White, during the writing of this book; something he did not attempt during her writing of any other book. You may read of this experience (and we strongly encourage you to) in Mrs. White’s own Life Sketches pages 161-163. Satan not only hates Christ and his followers but he also hates God’s written words, the Bible and the Testimony of Jesus, the spirit of prophecy (see Revelation 12:17 and Revelation 19:10). Because Satan was unsuccessful in taking the life of God’s messenger and preventing her from completing the greatest of her works, all his pent up, vehement ire is being unleashed against The Great Controversy; and he has found the most unsuspecting of allies in those called upon to declare the messages contained therein and to widely disseminate it.

From the very onset of its publication, Satan was not idle. He worked through some of the leading brethren in Seventh-day Adventism to urge that The Great Controversy was not to be used for evangelistic purposes and allowed it to sit for approximately two years, an idea that is refuted by the author herself. Mrs. White speaking: “I speak to you who are engaged in the canvassing work. Have you read volume 4 [The Great Controversy]? Do you know what it contains? Have you any appreciation of the subject matter? Do you not see that the people need the light therein given?...I was moved by the Spirit of the Lord to write that book, and while working upon it, I felt a great burden upon my soul. I knew that time was short, that the scenes which are soon to crowd upon us would at the last come very suddenly and swiftly...The Lord has set before me matters which are of urgent importance for the present time, and which reach into the future. The words have been spoken in a charge to me, ‘Write in a book the things which thou hast seen and heard, and let it go to all the people; for the time is at hand when past history will be repeated.’”

Now that we have an understanding why there is such a great controversy over The Great Controversy, we will look at a timeline of Satan’s attempts to kill the book, by discrediting it, its author and even the source of its inspiration.

1899: The Great Controversy remained on the shelf for two years-- Ellen White wrote a scathing rebuke to those in charge of the canvassing work, who were deliberately allowing The Great Controversy to lay dormant on the shelf while those that would have greatly benefitted by its reading, were neglected and thus left to grope in darkness. “Years ago, when I was in Battle Creek, I was much distressed that Great Controversy should lie idle on the shelf. For two years it was held back that Bible Readings might have more attention. All that I could say did not change the course of those who had control of the canvassing work. They treated me as if I were a child. If at that time I had appealed to the people, asking for agents to handle my books, and promising to supply them, it would have been in the order of the Lord.”

1976: Neal Wilson stated that The Great Controversy Belongs in the Historical trash heap-- A statement was made before a federal court by then North American Division President Neal Wilson in which he asserted that the “anti-Catholicism” contained in The Great Controversy belongs in the historical trash heap. The statement reads as follows: “‘Although it is true that there was a period in the life of the Seventh-day Adventist Church when the denomination took a distinctly anti-Roman Catholic viewpoint...that attitude on the church's part was nothing more than a manifestation of widespread anti-popery among conservative Protestant denominations in the early part of this century, and the latter part of the last, which has now been consigned to the historical trash heap as far as the Seventh-day Adventist Church is concerned. "Neal C. Wilson, President of the North American Division of SDA, in statement (deposition) submitted to the court, Merikay McLeod lawsuit, EEOC vs PPPA, C-74-2025-CBR, docket entry #84, sworn statement dated February 6, 1976.

1980’s: The Great Controversy Deemed a Hate Book in Canada-- Canada ruled that The Great Controversy was deemed hate literature after receiving complaints about the book being distributed in a wealthy section of town. “I am the police commissioner of Montreal. We have received numerous complaints about a book entitled The Great Controversy that is being placed in letter boxes in a ‘wealthy section’ of the city. After some research we have identified your Church as the publisher and distributor. A quick perusal has clearly shown that the book is very anti the Catholic Church and thus falls in the category of ‘Hate Literature’ because its content can easily create hatred between communities.’ Then he quoted from an article of law that prohibited such an action and mentioned the heavy fine that went along for distributing material attacking another church. Seventh-day Adventist leaders distanced themselves from those who distributed the book.”

1990: General Conference Representative stated that The Great Controversy was Trash-- Neal Wilson’s sentiments were repeated by a General Conference representative, Shirley Burton to the Indianapolis Star. “Seventh-day Adventist faction from Tennessee mailed an unknown number of anti-Catholic booklets (primarily composed of quotations from the book, Great Controversy) the week of July 8 to homes in Indianapolis, where 2,000 (delegates) gathered for the denomination's 55th world convention, July 6-14. Shirley Burton, a spokesperson for the denomination, told the Indianapolis Star daily newspaper the tract was 'trash.' The pamphlet, United States in Prophecy, calls Catholicism a pagan religion and refers to the pope as a beast. John F. Fink, editor of the Criterion, Indianapolis archdiocesan newspaper [wrote this], 'The Seventh-day Adventists have a history of anti-Catholicism, like many other Protestant religions in the U.S. during the 18th and 19th centuries. However, the main body of the Church has moved away from an anti-Catholic position. The new position of co-operation with the Catholic Church was exemplified by the invitation from the Seventh-day Adventists to the Vatican to send an official observer to the conference.’”

2010: Adventist Publication, published an article, written by an SDA Pastor titled, “Letting Roman Catholics Off the Hook” denigrating The Great Controversy and the prophecies contained therein-- Author, Loren Seibold writes: “For over a century, even before the publication of The Great Controversy, we Adventists have regarded the Roman Catholic Church leadership, typified in the first beast of Revelation 13, as our arch-nemesis, our bête noire, the enemy that takes the evil part in the apocalyptic scenario against God’s remnant. Here are seven reasons why it may be time to question them in that role. 1. More than a hundred years have passed since our prophet approved these prophetic applications...Ellen White fingered Catholicism in a very different world...The Roman Catholic Church of today is a much different institution than it was during Ellen White’s time...” The author even quotes from a man he calls his friend, Bert B. Beach, the man who represented the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists in 1977 and presented Pope Paul VI with a gold medallion.

My Angel said THREE TIMES that the most Satanic BOOK OF A NEW ORDER associated with the new movement, new organization THAT IS IN APOSTSY, is the change made involving the book Great Controversy; We should sigh and cry aloud from the rooftops for what Satan has been allowed to do with this book!!!

2011: Former Ministries Director calls The Great Controversy Anti-Catholic and not a good book for evangelism-- Former Church Ministries Director of the Quebec Conference of Seventh Day Adventists, Eddy Johnson, wrote an article on a (progressive) Adventist website expressing his disagreement and strong disapproval of The Great Controversy Project, in which The Great Controversy was to be distributed on a large scale, comparing the language in the book to white supremacist hate language. He further used the backlash from previous distributions of the book as a reason why The Great Controversy should not be mass-distributed. And worst of all, he stated that the prophecies contained in the book are outdated and simply not true. In his words: “Written in the United States of the nineteenth century, The Great Controversy had quite an impact because America was a Protestant country and any writing that depicted in dark overtones the doings of the Catholic Church was bound to be highly popular. Some of the words that Ellen White used to describe the Pope and the prelates of Rome are very harsh...We condemn similar anti-Catholic language used by white supremacists in their rallies, should we be careful not to be perceived as doing the same?...I do not believe that having to face irate people and the press and maybe the court, charged with distributing hate literature, is necessarily what Christ had in mind when he said that those who would be persecuted for his namesake should consider themselves as blessed...many scholars and well-informed church members consider somewhat outmoded some prophetic interpretations and beliefs that are presented in the book.”

2014: The Great Hope (hoax), a reducing down (gutting) of The Great Controversy into a mere pamphlet removing all references to the Pope and other important truths -- Following President Ted Wilson’s election as General Conference President in 2010, he promised to launch an initiative for the mass-distribution of The Great Controversy. Initially called The Great ControversyProject,” Ted Wilson did have thousands of books, in its entirety mailed out. Sadly, the project morphed into “The Great Hope,” wherein a mere pamphlet, devoid of foundational truths, pertinent history and the distinctive present truth messages was being circulated. The pamphlet is significantly lacking and is a poor, watered-down version of the original work. The omissions are glaring which indicate that the publishing and wide circulation of The Great Hope was an insidious conspiracy to withhold truth from individuals. For further information about the omissions and implications of this brochure called The Great Hope, please see our article at the following link: https://www.prophesyagain.org/single-post/2017/06/23/Mark-Finley-Defends-Urges-Seventh-day-Adventists-To-Silence-The-Protest-Against-Great-Hope-A-Controversy-Over-The-Great-Controversy-1

2015: An “Adventist” publication, Adventist Today publishes an article entitled “A proposed Letter of Apology to Pope Francis from the GC President-- In the article, the author denounces The Great Controversy as anti-Catholic and a collection of conspiracy theories and decries the mass-distribution of the book in Philadelphia just before the Pope’s visit for the World Meeting of Families in that city. A portion of the article reads thus: “We can be encouraged that the organization which was responsible for the mailing of The Great Controversyvolume was not the official Seventh-day Adventist Church... However, the message that this mailing was clearly intended to communicate is an anti-Catholic message and the source of that message emanates from a part of the Adventist tradition. In light of this action on the part of members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, it is here proposed that the President of the General Conference of the Seventh-day Adventist Church send the following letter or some version of it to the Pope asking for his understanding and forgiveness.”

2017: Adventist Today republishes “Letting Roman Catholics off the Hook” (please refer to 2010)

June 2017: Renowned SDA evangelist, Mark Finley defends The Great Hope in a video--After much backlash over the halting of the mass-distribution of The Great Controversy and in its place the publishing and distribution of The Great Hope, Mark Finely justifies The Great Hope in a video titled, “Mark Finley responds to false claims about the Great Hope book.

May 2018: An article is published on Spectrum Magazine titled “The Great Controversy” Shackles Adventist Theology” -- In the article, Matthew Quartey argues that The Great Controversy needs to be continually updated and revised as times change, among his other denunciatory assessments about the book such as it being unkind and erroneous. “So how do we make the book better and relevant? We revise—as often as needed. And in our revisions, we should never be afraid of correcting where previous editions made claims that are erroneous or unkind.”

July 2018: Current SDA Pastor writes and publishes an article on Adventist Today denouncing Ellen White, The Great Controversy, the Sunday Law and the Investigative Judgment.-- In his article “Itching Ears,” the author, Loren Siebold makes his disdain for The Great Controversy abundantly clear, stating that it is anti-Catholic, its prophecies outdated and that its wide distribution is ineffective and embarrassing.

December 2018: In an article, former pastor and president of the Netherlands Union, Reinder Bruinsma, published his skepticism of a Sunday Law while stating that Ellen White is disqualified as a true prophet and denouncing The Great Controversy as outdated and in need of revision. —He writes, “Adventists must ask themselves: Does the Bible clearly predict a time when merciless Sunday laws will be enforced? We should realize that this Sunday-law scenario is mainly based on the interpretation of the prophecies of the Revelation by Ellen White in her book The Great Controversy. For some this means that, against all present appearances, the Sunday laws are coming, because ‘she says so!’ For others it means that Ellen White was wrong and that she is thereby disqualified as a prophetic beacon for the Adventist believers. For me, it means that we must revise our concept of inspiration.

Ellen White wrote her book The Great Controversy in the late nineteenth century, against the background of circumstances that prevailed in the United States. Her world was divided between Roman Catholics and Protestants. She belonged to a tiny Adventist sect that was not welcome. She lived in a time when politicians at the state level and the national level were doing all they could to enforce Sunday observance. She experienced how in some states Sabbath keepers were actually put in prison! However, her world no longer exists.”

Note by Ron: As we watch videos on how fast the Sunday Law is progressing AROUND THE WORLD, the statements of such magazines and their writers only DEMONSTRATE THAT ELLEN WHITE WAS RIGHT AGAIN!!!!!!!

As the great controversy nears its close, it is not difficult to see that the attacks onThe Great Controversy are becoming more bold and more frequent. But just as Satan attempted to kill Ellen White while undertaking the writing of this matchless book and he failed, he will continue to fail as he tries to trample and kill The Great Controversy, for we know how the controversy ends, with Satan being defeated. When reading The Great Controversy, few have a just appreciation of the excruciating pain, tears, conflict, prayers and untold anguish borne to bring us the life-changing message in its contents, which are not the words of mortals but those inspired of God. I pray that each reader will value The Great Controversy to an even greater degree and make a more determined effort to live according to its principles and scatter this book as the leaves of autumn.

1. White, Ellen. Colporteur Ministry (1953), page 128

2. White Ellen. Manuscript Releases Volume 169,(1981), page 169

3. http://www.sdadefend.com/Defend-foundation/popemedl.htm

4. https://spectrummagazine.org/article/eddy-johnson/2011/08/26/will-great-controversy-project-harm-adventism

5. http://www.sdadefend.com/Defend-foundation/popemedl.htm

6. https://atoday.org/reprint-letting-roman-catholics-off-the-hook/

7. http://www.sdadefend.com/Defend-foundation/popemedl.htm

8. https://spectrummagazine.org/article/eddy-johnson/2011/08/26/will-great-controversy-project-harm-adventism

9. https://atoday.org/a-proposed-letter-of-apology-to-pope-francis-from-the-president-of-the-general-conference-of-seventh-day-adventists/

10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4ve5JpHudg

11. https://spectrummagazine.org/article/2018/05/17/%E2%80%9C-great-controversy%E2%80%9D-shackles-adventist-theology-0

12. https://atoday.org/adventist-todays-most-misunderstood-article-ever/.

On Sunday, June 2, 2019, I was shown the following vision concerning Ellen White’s following statement: I asked the Lord Jesus Christ and His Holy Spirit for a specific answer as to why Ellen White would make such a statement against the SDA church, of which she herself was a member until she died in 1915. I was given some most important answers.

“I was confirmed in all I had stated in Minneapolis, that a reformation must go through the churches. Reforms must be made, for spiritual weakness and blindness were upon the people who had been blessed with great light and precious opportunities and privileges. As reformers they had come out of the denominational churches, but they now act a part similar to that which the churches acted. We hoped that there would not be the necessity for another coming out. While we will endeavor to keep the "unity of the Spirit" in the bonds of peace, we will not with pen or voice cease to protest against bigotry.”--EGW '88 356, 357 (1889). {LDE 48.1}

"Of those who boast of their light and yet fail to walk in it Christ says, "But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment than for you. And thou, Capernaum [Seventh-day Adventists, who have had great light], which art exalted unto heaven [in point of privilege], shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works which have been done in thee had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day." Ellen G. White, Review and Herald Articles, Aug. 1, 1893. [THE BRACKETED COMMENTS ARE BY ELLEN WHITE.] {LDE 48.2}

Notice the date of the statement, Aug. 1, 1893! 1893 was 126 years ago. How many SDA’s have been baptized since 1893. It would be safe to say that thousands of SDA’s have been baptized on the premise that the SDA church is God’s “chosen” people church WITHOUT BEING INFORMED THAT THE PROPHETESS OF THE CHUCH prophesied that the church as a corporate church would be brought down to hell!!!!!! How many of those thousands of baptized MEMBERS of the professing SDA church were told THE REASON WHY Ellen White made such a serious statement about the corporate SDA church?

· How does the statement accord with Matthew 23:15?

· Matthew 23:15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves

· God calls the scribes and pharisees of the SDA church hypocrites that compass sea and land to make one proselyte (convert), only to make him TWOFOLD more the child of hell than SDA Evangelists THEMSELVES are.

· Because of the seriousness of this issue, I fasted long and prayed much

· I asked the Lord why the SDA church members were/are hypocrites and why they will be made more the child of hell than those they convert as MEMBERS of the church. Below are the answers I was given.

1. I was specifically shown that since 1893, SDA’s have, as missionaries, compassed sea and land to make proselytes (converts) only to make them twice the children of hell Adventists themselves ALREADY WERE/ARE.

2. The reason God calls the leaders hypocrites, is because they call the other churches Babylon, and call folk out of them, BUT ARE GOING TO INSTRUCT THEIR OWN MEMBERS TO KEEP SUNDAY SACRED.

3. How many MEMBERS will take the Mark when and because the leaders instruct them to do so? This becomes a very serious question since it involves a people who believe the voice of the General Conference is the VOICE OF GOD to the church. It seems that it would have to involve the leaders of the General Conference to have any weight at all. But this should never be a question in a church that is totally honest with its members. And the church has not been totally honest, because most members of the church are not even aware that Ellen White made the following serious statement:

4. Change leaders : "There is manifested on the part of men in responsible positions an unwillingness to confess where they have been in the wrong and their neglect is working disaster, not only to themselves, but to the churches....You will be left to make mistakes of a similar character, you will continue to lack wisdom, and will can sin righteousness and righteousness sin. The multitude of deceptions that will prevail in these last days will encircle you, and you will change leaders, and not know that you have done so." E.G. White, Review and Herald, Vol. 2, 448.

If the sins of the people are passed over by those in responsible positions, His frown will be upon them, and the people of God, as a body, will be held RESPONSIBLE for those sins. (3T:265)

WILL THE SINS OF THE PEOPLE CONTINUE TO BE PASSED OVER BY THOSE IN RESPONSIBLE POSITIONS AND WHY? The leaders will NEVER GAIN bark to show the people their sins cf Isaiah 58:1 This is gross unfaithfulness on the part of the leaders, and that is exactly why Ezekiel 9 slaughter begins with them.

Begin at My Sanctuary -- "Here we see that the church--the Lord's sanctuary--was the first to feel the stroke of the wrath of God. The ancient men, those to whom God had given great light and who had stood as guardians of the spiritual interests of the people, had betrayed their trust. They had taken the position that we need not look for miracles and the marked manifestation of God's power as in former days. Times have changed. These words strengthen their unbelief, and they say: The Lord will not do good, neither will He do evil. He is too merciful to visit His people in judgment. Thus ‘Peace and safety’ is the cry from men who will never again lift up their voice like a trumpet to show God's people their transgressions and the house of Jacob their sins. These dumb dogs that would not bark are the ones who feel the just vengeance of an offended God. Men, maidens, and little children all perish together." E. G. White, Testimonies, Vol. 5, 211.

I was shown the following scenario about Ezekiel 9:

When the SDA leaders instruct Adventists to keep Sunday sacred, this is absolutely going to enrage Babylon’s leaders. Why? Because for 175 year as of this writing, Adventist’s have “stolen” sheep from “babylonians” based on the teaching that Sunday keeping will be the mark of the beast, and when SDA leaders act the part of a world class OPPORTUNISTIC WHORE by instructing their members to keep Sunday sacred and then steal more sheep from them who will worship with them on Sunday, this enrages Babylon, and rightly so!

It is interesting that the SDA Bible Commentary says that the Babylonians are the slaughterers of Ezekiel 9. When it becomes “legal” to kill Adventists, these enraged Babylonian pastors and their patrons will slaughter Adventists BEGINNING WITH THEIR ANCIENT MEN (LEADERS 5t 211). So they will pay a gruesome price for their apostasy. In addition to being brought down to hell for it.

I was shown that this is the reason God designed HOME CHURCHES at the end-time.

"I saw the nominal church and nominal Adventists, like Judas, would betray us to the Catholics to obtain their influence to come against the truth. The saints then will be an obscure [hidden] people, little known to the Catholics but the churches and nominal Adventists who know of our faith and customs (for they hate us on account of the Sabbath, for they could not refute it) will betray the saints and report them to the Catholics as those who disregard the institutions of the people that is, that they keep the Sabbath and disregard Sunday.

Then the Catholics bid the Protestants to go forward, and issue a decree that all who will not observe the first day of the week, instead of the seventh day, shall be slain. And the Catholics, whose numbers are large, will stand by the Protestants. The Catholics will give their power to the image of the beast. And the Protestants will work as their mother worked before them to destroy the saints. But before their decree bring or bear fruit, the saints will be delivered by the Voice of God. Then I saw that Jesus' work in the sanctuary will soon be finished. And after His work there is finished, He will come to the door of the first apartment, and confess the sins of Israel upon the head of the Scape Goat. Then He will put on the garments of vengeance. Then the plagues will come upon the wicked, and they do not come till Jesus puts on that garment, and takes Hs place upon the great white cloud. Then while the plagues are falling, the Scape Goat is being led away. He makes a mighty struggle to escape, but he is held fast by the hand that leads him. If he should effect his escape, Israel would lose their lives. I saw that it would take time to lead away the Scape Goat into the land of forgetfulness after the sins were put on his head.

The great white cloud I saw was not the holy place, but entirely separate from the holy and most holy place, entirely separate from the sanctuary.

Then the angel repeated these words, and said, 'This is the time spoken of in Isaiah. He saw that there was not man, and wondered that there was no intercessor. He had no mediator between God and man, and these plagues could be withheld no longer, for Jesus had ceased to plead for Israel, and they were covered with the covering of the Almighty God, and they could live in the sight of a holy God, and those who were not covered, the plagues fell upon them, for they had nothing to shelter or protect them from the wrath of God." E.G. White, Dorchester, Maine, October 23, 1850, Spalding-Magan's Unpublished Mss. Testimonies, pp. 1, 2.

pro·lep·sis

Show Spelled[lep] Show IPA

Spelled[] Show IPA.

the anticipation of possible objections in order to answer them in advance.

the assigning of a person, event, etc., to a period earlier than the actual one; the representation of something in the future as if it already existed or had occurred; prochronism.

the use of a descriptive word in anticipation of its becoming applicable.

a fundamental conception or assumption in Epicureanism or Stoicism arising spontaneously in the mind without conscious reflection; thought provoked by sense perception.

the return of an attack of a periodic disease or of a paroxysm before the expected time or at progressively shorter intervals.

PROLEPSIS PROPHETIC STATEMENT:

Here is the Spirit of Prophecy prophesied prolepsis statement regarding the final fate of that once Noble Ship. This is a major LYNCHPIN to my warning message. Can you explain it away? Are you a passenger on this once NOBLE SHIP, that is about to sink to rise no more? NOTICE WHO SEPARATES FROM WHOM:

"Jesus sends HIS PEOPLE a message of warning to prepare them for his coming. To the prophet John was made known the closing work in the great plan of man's redemption. He beheld an angel flying 'in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people, saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him for the hour of his Judgment is come and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters [Rev. 14:6, 7.].

The angel represented in prophecy as delivering this message, symbolizes a class of faithful men, who, obedient to the promptings of God's Spirit and the teachings of his word, proclaim this warning to the inhabitants of earth. This message was not to be committed to the religious leaders of the people. They had failed to preserve their connection with God, and had REFUSED THE LIGHT FROM HEAVEN therefore they WERE NOT of the number described by the apostle Paul: 'But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief. Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day we are not of the night nor of darkness' [1 Thess. 5:4, 5].

The watchmen upon the walls of Zion should be the first to catch the tidings of the Saviour's advent, the first to lift their voices to proclaim him near, the first to warn the people to prepare for his coming. But they were at ease, dreaming of peace and safety, while the people were asleep in their sins. Jesus saw HIS CHURCH, like the barren fig-tree, covered with pretentious leaves, yet destitute of precious fruit. There was a boastful observance of the forms of religion, while the spirit of true humility, penitence and faith--which alone could render the service acceptable to God--was lacking. Instead of the graces of the Spirit, there were manifested pride, formalism, vainglory, selfishness, oppression. A BACKSLIDING CHURCH closed their eyes to the signs of the times. God did nor forsake them, or suffer his faithfulness to fail but they departed from him, and SEPARATED THEMSELVES from his love. As they REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS, his promises were NOT FULFILLED to them." E.G. White, The Spirit of Prophecy, Vol. 4, pp. 199-200 [The 1884 edition of The Great Controversy, 199, 200].

Note these important delineations in the above statement:

· Ellen White is addressing HIS PEOPLE.

· Ellen White is addressing those to whom God committed the EVERLASTING GOSPEL of Revelation 14.

· Ellen White is defining the angel represented in prophecy as symbolizing a class of faithful men.

· Ellen White is saying emphatically that the final Loud Cry message is delivered NOT BY THE LEADERS OF THE SDA CHURCH, but by a class of faithful men, because the leaders had failed to preserve their connection with God and had refused light from heaven!

· Ellen White is addressing "watchmen upon the walls of Zion," NOT FALLEN BABYLON!

· Twice Ellen White mentions HIS CHURCH, NOT FALLEN BABYLON.

· It is the MEMBERS of said church that SEPARATE FROM GOD, AND THAT IS WHY WE HAVE TO SEPARATE FROM THEM OR BE CORPORATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR APOSTASY.

· The above reasons are why there is another coming out of a faithful remnant FROM APOSTATE JERUSALEM AS WELL AS FALLEN BABYLON.

· Isa 37:31 And the remnant that is escaped of the house of Judah shall again take root downward, and bear fruit upward:

· Isa 37:32 For out of Jerusalem shall go forth a remnant, and they that escape out of mount Zion: the zeal of the LORD of hosts shall do this.

Ellen White is addressing a BACKSLIDING CHURCH whose leaders and laity alike failed and rejected light from heaven and who refused to comply with the conditions so that God's promises are not fulfilled to them. Consider the following commentary on the 1884 Great Controversy that the above statement is quoted from:

“Consider for a few moments the chapter in the first edition of Great Controversy, Volume IV, published by Pacific Press in 1884. In Chapter XXVII, ‘The Snares of Satan,’ you find that about four pages in the latter part of the chapter were omitted from the later editions of Great Controversy. These four pages are to be found in Testimonies to Ministers, pages 472 to 475. The information contained in these four pages is very valuable to Seventh-day Adventists and was very appropriately included in the first edition of Great Controversy, Volume IV, which when it was published was like the other volumes considered to be A MESSAGE ESPECIALLY TO SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS, and to [all] Christian people sympathizing with them in beliefs and aims.” W. C. White, Selected Messages, Appendix C, pp. 452, 453.

In the LITERAL fulfillment of Ezekiel 9 example of apostate Israel, (A. D. 27-70) all the good left the apostate Jewish church, the Synagogue of Satan. Ezekiel 22:17-31. In the next LITERAL fulfillment of Ezekiel 9, the good leave the bad and the apostate church is destroyed:

Isa 37:31 And the remnant that is escaped of the house of Judah shall again take root downward, and bear fruit upward:

Isa 37:32 For out of Jerusalem shall go forth a remnant, and they that escape out of mount Zion: the zeal of the LORD of hosts shall do this.

The church militant is not the remnant church. Like the Jewish “chosen people” church, it was supposed to be the remnant, but like the Jewish church, it has committed abomination apostasy. So the faithful once more will go forth OUT OF (SDA Spiritual) Isaiah 37:31,32, JERUSALEM, AS WELL AS OUT OF BABYLON, because both are apostate.

God bless your study of the pure truth in lieu of the teachings of apostate man.

No Difference Between the Fallen Churches and the World

“I saw that since the second angel proclaimed the fall of the churches, they have been growing more and more corrupt. They bear the name of being Christ's followers; yet it is impossible to distinguish them from the world. Ministers take their texts from the Word of God, but preach smooth things. To this the natural heart feels no objection. It is only the spirit and power of the truth and the salvation of Christ that are hateful to the carnal heart. There is nothing in the popular ministry that stirs the wrath of Satan, makes the sinner tremble, or applies to the heart and conscience the fearful realities of a judgment soon to come. Wicked men are generally pleased with a form of piety without true godliness, and they will aid and support such a religion.

Said the angel, "Nothing less than the whole armor of righteousness can enable man to overcome the powers of darkness and retain the victory over them. Satan has taken full possession of the churches as a body.” Early Writings, p. 273.

"The watchmen upon the walls of Zion should be the first to catch the tidings of the Saviour's advent, the first to lift their voices to proclaim him near, the first to warn the people to prepare for his coming. But they were at ease, dreaming of peace and safety, while the people were asleep in their sins. Jesus saw HIS CHURCH, like the barren fig-tree, covered with pretentious leaves, yet destitute of precious fruit. There was a boastful observance of the forms of religion, while the spirit of true humility, penitence and faith--which alone could render the service acceptable to God--was lacking. Instead of the graces of the Spirit, there were manifested pride, formalism, vainglory, selfishness, oppression. A BACKSLIDING CHURCH closed their eyes to the signs of the times. God did nor forsake them, or suffer his faithfulness to fail but they departed from him, and SEPARATED THEMSELVES from his love. As they REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS, his promises were NOT FULFILLED to them." E.G. White, The Spirit of Prophecy, vol. 4, pp. 199-200 [The 1884 edition of The Great Controversy, [NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH TESTIMONIES, VOL. 4]

You cannot watch the videos by Emmanuel Nougaisse without seeing how the church is WEEKLY lessening the distance between itself and the papacy. Here is a sampling:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-m5_FX7ElDc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpDOp9RqdkE

What makes her backsliding? “It is a backsliding church that lessens the distance between itself and the Papacy.” ST, February 19, 1894 (3ST 99).

· God's displeasure is upon His people, and He will not manifest His power in the midst of them while sins exist among them and are fostered by those in RESPONSIBLE positions. (3T:270)

· The sin of Eli was in passing lightly over the iniquity of his sons, who were occupying sacred offices. The neglect of the father to reprove and restrain his sons brought upon Israel a fearful calamity. The sons of Eli were slain, Eli himself lost his life, the ark of God was taken from Israel, and thirty thousand of the people were slain. All this was because sin was lightly regarded and allowed to remain among them. What a lesson is this to men holding RESPONSIBLE positions in the church of God! It adjures them faithfully to remove the wrongs that dishonor the cause of truth. (4T:166)

· The leaven of unbelief is working, and unless these evils which bring the displeasure of God are corrected in its members, the whole CHURCH stands ACCOUNTABLE for them. (RH 12-23-90; pr:10)

· The church is in a great degree RESPONSIBLE for the sins of her members. She gives countenance to the evil, if she fails to lift her voice against it. The influence from which she has most to fear is not that of open opposers, infidels, and blasphemers, but of inconsistent professors of Christ. These are the ones who keep back the blessing of the God of Israel. (SW 05-10-04 pr:06)

· The church as a whole is in a degree RESPONSIBLE for the wrongs of its individual members because they countenance the evil in not lifting up their voice against it.The favor of God is not enjoyed for several reasons. His Spirit is grieved by the pride, extravagance, dishonesty, and overreaching which are indulged by some professing godliness. All these things bring the frown of God upon His people. (4T:490, 491)

· Ellen White says in 5T 211 that the dumb dog watchmen (Isa 56:10-12) will NEVER AGAIN BARK to show God’s people their sins. Notice that Walter Veith never engages this DUTY TO THE CHURCH.

· Those who have too little courage to reprove wrong, or who through indolence or lack of interest make no earnest effort to purify the family or the church of God, are held accountable for the evil that may result from their neglect of duty. We are just as RESPONSIBLE for evils that we might have checked in others by exercise of parental or pastoral authority, as if the acts had been our own. (CG:235, 236)

· Aaron failing to stand up boldly for the right, his yielding to the strength of numbers, placed him with the majority. Aaron represents the cases of a large number composing our churches at the present day. They pass over sins existing in the church which grieve the spirit of God. They are lax where order and principle are involved, because it is not pleasant to reprove and correct wrongs. They are themselves carried along with the current, and become RESPONSIBLE for a fearful neglect of faithfulness. (ST 05-27-80 pr:04)

· ...if the sins of the people are passed over by those in responsible positions, His frown will be upon them, and the people of God, as a body, will be held RESPONSIBLE for those sins. (3T:265)

IMPOSSIBLE TO UNITY WITH THE CORRUPT AND REMAIN PURE

I asked my angel for the SPECIFIC REASON why sda’s will be BROUGHT DOWN TO HELL.

I was shown the reason as follows:

The Lord has a controversy with His professed people in these last days. In this controversy men in responsible positions will take a course directly opposite to that pursued by Nehemiah. They will not only ignore and despise the Sabbath themselves, but they will try to keep it from others by burying it beneath the rubbish of custom and tradition. In churches and in large gatherings in the open air, ministers will urge upon the people the necessity of keeping the first day of the week. There are calamities on sea and land: and these calamities will increase, one disaster following close upon another; and the little band of conscientious Sabbath-keepers will be pointed out as the ones who are bringing the wrath of God upon the world by their disregard of Sunday." R & H 3-18-1884.

I was shown that the changing of the book THE GREAT CONTROVERSY was tantamount to giving the people the above statement because the book that has replaced The Great Controversy omits much about the mark of the beast. And is thus Apostate Adventism’s contribution to the October 31 2018 discontinuance of the Lutheran Protestant Movement.

I was shown that Adventism was to be a continuance of the Protestant Reformation and never a contributor to it’s demise!

http://www.ellenwhite.info/future-of-protestantism-3a.htm

The Gospel and the Protestant Reformation THE GREAT HOPE OF THE WORLD

"The principle for which the disciples stood so fearlessly when, in answer to the command not to speak any more in the name of Jesus, they declared, “Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye,” is the same that the adherents of the gospel struggled to maintain in the days of the Reformation. When in 1529 the German princes assembled at the Diet of Spires, there was presented the emperor’s decree restricting religious liberty, and prohibiting all further dissemination of the reformed doctrines. It seemed that the hope of the world was about to be crushed out. Would the princes accept the decree? Should the light of the gospel be shut out from the multitudes still in darkness? Mighty issues for the world were at stake. Those who had accepted the reformed faith met together, and their unanimous decision was, “Let us reject this decree. In matters of conscience the majority has no power.”—Merle d’Aubigne, History of the Reformation, b. 13, ch. 5. {AA 68.1}

This principle we in our day are firmly to maintain. The banner of truth and religious liberty held aloft by the founders of the gospel church and by God’s witnesses during the centuries that have passed since then, has, in this last conflict, been committed to our hands. The responsibility for this great gift rests with those whom God has blessed with a knowledge of His word. We are to receive this word as supreme authority. We are to recognize human government as an ordinance of divine appointment, and teach obedience to it as a sacred duty, within its legitimate sphere. But when its claims conflict with the claims of God, we must obey God rather than men. God’s word must be recognized as above all human legislation. A “Thus saith the Lord” is not to be set aside for a “Thus saith the church” or a “Thus saith the state.” The crown of Christ is to be lifted above the diadems of earthly potentates. {AA 68.2}

I was shown that the change in the book The Great Controversy was directed by Satan Himself. Ellen White said that Satan tried to kill her while she was writing that book. When the book was changed to The Great Hope, Satan succeeded! Most SDA dumb dog watchmen stood by and DID NOTHING!

· SDA Evangelists travel the world to warn others of the Mark of the beast, Sunday worship, YET, THE HYPOCRITICAL leadership plans to instruct SDA’s in large gatherings (I WAS SHOWN THESE ARE CAMP MEETINGS) will URGE SDA’S OF THE necessity of keeping the first day of the week.

· DO YOU HAVE` ANY IDEA HOW REPREHENSIBLE THIS MUST BE TO GOD? I WAS SHOWN THAT:

· Since SDA leaders should have KNOWN OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THE ABOVE E. G. WHITE statement SINCE March 18, 1884. SO THAT to be honest, ALL SDA EVANGELISTS since that time should have warned their hearers of this eventual heretical apostasy by the leaders so that no MEMBER WOULD EVER be deceived by this heinous abomination when it occurs. But what does Walter Veith do? He ADVISES SDA’S TO SUPER GLUE THEMSELVES TO A PEW AT THE LOCAL new organization that is in apostasy, while we are instructed to REPUDIATE the new organization BECAUSE IT IS IN APOSTASY FROM THE TRUTH said Ellen White.

· No New Organization—"The Lord has declared that the history of the past shall be rehearsed as we enter upon the closing work. Every truth that he has given for these last days is to be proclaimed to the world. Every pillar that He has established is to be strengthened. We cannot now enter into any new organization; for this would mean apostasy from the Truth. 2 Selected Messages, pg 390.

· "The enemy of souls has sought to bring in the supposition that a great reformation was to take place among Seventh-day Adventists, and that this reformation would consist in giving up the doctrines which stand as the pillars of our faith, and engaging in a process of reorganization. Were this reformation to take place, what would result? The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed. The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A NEW ORGANIZATION would be established. Books of a new order would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy would be introduced. The founders of this system would go into the cities, and do a wonderful work. The Sabbath of course, would be lightly regarded, as also the God who created it. Nothing would be allowed to stand in the way of the NEW MOVEMENT. The leaders would teach that virtue is better than vice, but God being removed, they would place their dependence on human power, which, without God, is worthless. Their foundation would be built on the sand, and storm and tempest would sweep away the structure.” 1SM 204, 205.

· WHO HAS AUTHORITY TO BEGIN SUCH A [NEW] MOVEMENT? We have our Bibles. We have our experience, attested to by the miraculous working of the Holy Spirit. We have a truth that admits of no compromise. Shall we not repudiate everything that is not in harmony with this truth?" E.G. White, Selected Messages.BK 1, pp.204-205.

NO! SAYS WALTER VEITH! Just GLUE YOURSELF TO A PEW at the new organization that is in apostasy. Thus he totally violates Isaiah 8:20 and CANNOT BE TRUSTED.

In the Holy Name of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob,

R. William Beaulieu

Important Conclusions

· MARK THIS POINT WITH CARE: It is those who refuse to sigh and cry about the rampant abominations in the church, who always oppose and try to explain away Ellen White’s statements on corporate responsibility. But I saw that they might just as well try to explain away the account of Achan in the Bible, for Ellen White bases on the story of Achan, much of what she says about corporate responsibility. I saw that Satan hates the truth of corporate responsibility, and loves those who try to explain it away. For they are the same ones who refuse to sigh and cry for all the abominations. Walter Veith is a prime example of this Ellen White’s statements on this principle are TOO PLAIN to need re-interpretation by ANYONE, ESPECIALLY ANY WHO ARE GUILTY Of NOT SIGHING AND CRYING FOR ALL THE ABOMINATIONS THAT BE DONE In THE CHURCH. God does not indict us after the fact WITHOUT INFORMING US OF what is totally offensive in His sight. Thank you Lord for your perfect Justice.