How
Pantheism and the Trinity Doctrine Render the Sanctuary Service and the
Atonement as GONE
Sanctuary
Gone Atonement Gone -- "In a representation which passed before me, I saw
a certain work being done by medical missionary workers. Our ministering brethren
were looking on, watching what was being done, but they did not seem to
understand. The foundation of our faith, which was established by so much
prayer, such earnest searching of the Scriptures, was being taken down, pillar
by pillar. Our faith was to have nothing to rest upon--the sanctuary was gone,
the atonement was gone." E.G. White, The Upward Look, 152.
Click to go to our Home Page
|
|
glo·ry Great honor, praise, or
distinction accorded by common consent; renown. Something conferring honor or
renown. A highly praiseworthy asset: Your
wit is your crowning glory. Adoration, praise, and
thanksgiving offered in worship. Majestic beauty and splendor;
resplendence: The sun set in a blaze of glory. The splendor and bliss of
heaven; perfect happiness. A height of achievement,
enjoyment, or prosperity: ancient Rome in its greatest glory. A halo, nimbus, or aureole. Also
called gloriole. intr.v. glo·ried,
glo·ry·ing, glo·ries |
The American Heritage®
Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2009 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Cite This Source
The use of glory to the Lord in Luke 2:9 9 And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid.
Number
1391
Transliteration:
doxa
{dox'-ah}
Word Origin:
from
the base of 1380
TDNT:
2:233,178
Part of Speech:
noun
feminine
Usage in the KJV:
glory
145, glorious 10, honour 6, praise 4, dignity 2, worship 1
Total: 168
Definition:
opinion,
judgment, view
opinion,
estimate, whether good or bad concerning someone
in
the NT always a good opinion concerning one, resulting in praise, honour, and
glory
splendour,
brightness
of
the moon, sun, stars
magnificence,
excellence, preeminence, dignity, grace
majesty
a
thing belonging to God
the kingly majesty which belongs to Him as supreme ruler, majesty in the sense of the absolute perfection of the deity
di·vest
/Show Spelled[dih-vest,
dahy-] 
Show IPA
–verb (used with object)
1.
to strip of clothing, ornament, etc.: The wind divested the trees of their leaves.
2.
to strip or deprive (someone or something), esp. of property or rights; dispossess.
3.
to rid of or free from: He divested himself of all responsibility for the decision.
4.
Law . to take away or alienate (property, rights, etc.).
5.
Commerce .
a.
to sell off: to divest holdings.
b.
to rid of through sale: The corporation divested itself of its subsidiaries.
Origin:
1595–1605; < ML dīvestīre, equiv. to dī- di-2 + vestīre to dress, vest
—Related forms
un·di·vest·ed, adjective
—Synonyms
1. unclothe, denude. 2. See strip1 .
Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2011.
Cite This Source
|
Link
To divested
BDS &
Divestment
Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions Reactions & Critical
Discussions.
Lord of the
Rings Online
Join the Fellowship in Middle-Earth Play For Free.
No More Monthly Fee!
Sponsored
Results
Word Origin & History
divest
1560s, from M.Fr. devester "strip of possessions," from O.Fr. desvestir , from des- "away" + vestir "to clothe." The figurative sense of "strip of possessions" is earliest in English; reflexive sense of "to strip oneself of" is from c.1600. Economic sense (implied in divestment ) is from 1955. Related: Divested ; divesting .
Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper
Cite This Source
Legal Dictionary
Main Entry: di·vest
Pronunciation: dI-'vest, d&-
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Anglo-French devestir , literally, to undress, from Old French desvestir , from de(s) -, prefix marking reversal + vestir to dress, from Latin vestire
: to deprive or dispossess (oneself) of property through divestiture — di·vest·ment noun
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc. Cite
This Source
Those who believe the Trinity
Doctrine and/or denounce Ellen White's teaching on the Godhead, in actuality
make four distinct persons to the Godhead:
1.
The Father
2.
The Son
3.
The Holy Spirit
4.
The Son combined with humanity forever.
5.
Ellen White's view is
THREE DISTINCT PERSONS:
1.
The Father
2.
The Son's Holy Spirit as divested from Himself at His Incarnation
because it was cumbered by His humanity.
3.
The Son combined with humanity forever.
Ellen White said to Dr. Kellogg in 1903:
"You are not definitely clear on the personality of God,
which is everything to us as a people. You have virtually destroyed the Lord God Himself." EGW letter
300 1903.
Only one person, Ellen White, saw HOW Kellogg
destroyed the Lord God Himself. Only Ellen White saw how Kellogg's pantheism
teaching destroyed the personality of God (the Godhead) and the Lord God
Himself.
Only one person, Ellen White, saw HOW and WHY
Kellogg renderred the Sanctuary and the Atonement GONE, to wit:
Sanctuary Gone Atonement Gone -- "In a
representation which passed before me, I saw a certain work being done by
medical missionary workers. Our ministering brethren were looking on,
watching what was being done, but they did not seem to understand. The
foundation of our faith, which was established by so much prayer, such
earnest searching of the Scriptures, was being taken down, pillar by pillar.
Our faith was to have nothing to rest upon--the sanctuary was gone, the atonement was gone." E.G. White, The
Upward Look, 152.
What was it about Kellogg's teaching on pantheism
that rendered the sanctuary and the atonement as GONE? It was related to the
same thing involved with the Trinity Doctrine that makes it render the
sanctuary and atonement as GONE. Here is how and why:
Pantheism postulates that the Spirit of God is in
everything and everywhere at once. If that is true, why would Jesus have to
ascend to the Father after His resurrection to send us His Holy Spirit? Why
would Jesus have needed to die to give us His Holy Spirit, the soul of His
life if that Holy Spirit had already been IN EVERYTHING and had been
EVERYWHERE from eternity? You should readily see how that teaching rendered
the Sanctuary and the Atonement GONE! There would have been no need for the
Sanctuary and Atonement Service in the Sanctuary of Heaven so that Jesus could
give us the gift of His Holy Spirit as a regenerating agency, because it
would already have been within ALL OF US FROM ETERNITY.
The Trinity Doctrine results in the same
outcome--the Sanctuary GONE, the Atonement GONE. How? Why? Because if the
Holy Spirit existed forever as a third person, as the Trinity Doctrine
teaches, then there was NO FOREVER SACRIFICE of the Son in DIVESTING HIS HOLY
SPIRIT FROM HIS HUMANITY so that the soul of that past life, His Holy Spirit
only, HIS DIVINE NATURE, could be given to man as a gift for overcoming sin.
If the Holy Spirit already existed from eternity as a third person, that Holy
Spirit could be sent WITHOUT ANY INCARNATION SACRIFICE. Indeed if the Holy
Spirit did exist as a THIRD PERSON FROM ETERNITY, there was no Sanctuary and
atonement service associated with the THIRD PERSON, the soul of the life of
Christ. Thus, the Sanctuary and Atonement would be null and void--TOTALLY
UNNECESSARY.
So pantheism and the Trinity Doctrine achieve the
same end--the rending of the Sanctuary and the Atonement Sacrifice in the
heavenly Sanctuary from the foundation of the world. There is no worse
blasphemy that could be taught than teaching anything that does away with the
Sanctuary and Atonement Service--the highest good, crowing gift of heaven,
without which the cross would have been of no avail as regards sin, EXCEPT TO
PARDON SIN FOREVER, because the Testament of the Testator is of no strength
WHILE THE TESTATOR LIVES AS BEFORE. He must die to something forever and what
He died to forever was His existence as HOLY SPIRIT ONLY, to become combined
forever with humanity. That Holy Spirit ONLY person He divested from Himself
at His Incarnation BECAUSE HIS HUMANITY CUMBERED THAT HOLY SPIRIT by making
it impossible for Him to be every place at once, (and other limitations),
became a separate person at the Incarnation. And the Son combined with
humanity forever BECAME A SEPARATE DISTINCT PERSON, and if this did not
occur, THEN THE TESTATOR IS AS HE ALWAYS WAS AND THERE HAS BEEN NO SANCTUARY
SERVICE ATONEMENT IN HEAVEN.
Remember, in the Sanctuary Service, the priest had
to sprinkle the blood on the altar inside the Sanctuary before the Atonement
was complete. Thus, the cross did not complete the Atonement. However, it
completed the sacrifice of the Lamb, just as the rendering of the Lamb in the
typical service completed that rendering (sacrifice), but the Sanctuary
Service was not complete until the High Priest entered the Sanctuary and
sprinkled that blood on the altar.
It is of important consequence that God showed ONE
PERSON how pantheism destroyed the Sanctuary and the Atonement. It is of
important consequence that God has shown ONE PERSON how the Trinity Doctrine
abolishes the Sanctuary and the Atonement, and I say that with all the humility
God can lay upon me. The ministering brethren looked on in the alpha of
apostasy and did not understand the implications. The ministering
brethren are looking on in the Omega of apostasy but they don't
seem to understand what they have done. This is more serious than words can
depict.
Fools are rushing in on this serious issue where angel's fear to tread.
Ron
.