Foreword by Kevin
Straub
Referring to article by Tom DeWeese, below, I
agree that the Marxist Socialism of “Sustainable Development” is here and
is part of the Agenda for Total Global Control. Create an enemy,
wage a war, tax the people until they are helpless, begging, subservient
supplicants. It’s a formula.
Now, I believe we who are of the kingdom of God
must conduct our lives as those being about His business, well outside
the arena of earthly politics. I am convinced that we are not to be
in any way of a partisan or political mindset. In fact, I am
soundly apolitical. That does not mean I am anarchist. As
much as I liked certain things about Ron Paul, even if I were an American
citizen and could have voted, I would not have even voted for whom I
considered “the best man.” The exact center verse in the Bible is:
"It is better to trust in the Lord than to
put confidence in man" Psalm 118:8
“In Daniel 2, the greatest monarch of that time
(King Nebuchadnezzar) had a dream of a metal MAN representing the
kingdoms of man. At the end of the dream, a ROCK comes from the sky,
crushes the MAN, and fills the whole earth. The rock represents the
kingdom of "the great God," which shall one day "break in
pieces" the kingdoms of man and "fill the whole earth"
(see Daniel 2:35,44,45).” Steve Wohlberg’s “Timely Tiding”, No
Confidence in Man, Mar. 26, 2009.
I hope we all understand that there are no
political or economic systems that will achieve peace, equity, and
righteousness in the earth. All methods of human trade and
governance, no matter how great they may be or how much promise they may
hold at the outset -- as it is claimed of the Republican and Protestant
form of people’s constitutional government of the United States -- will
decay into corruption and tyranny. Man can do nothing else, for the
human unregenerate heart is desperately and incurably wicked. It
has to die and be replaced with the heart of God.
Yes, capitalism fails, too. We are
watching it unfold. The American dream was never more than a
dream.
The biggest problem with paper money, besides
lacking balance, is there is an insufficient pressure relief valve. All
money is loaned into existence with interest and principle due. If we
must pay the principle back how do we pay back the interest? Up until now
we just borrowed more and government helped by spending more all borrowed
with our co-sign. As time goes on the debt keeps getting larger and
larger. That kind of capitalism produces perpetual debt.. Perpetual debt
allows the banking parasites a very comfortable existence. But greed
knows no bounds and most parasites will not disembark until the host is
dead. . . .
Capitalism is an ism and needs to be avoided as
much as any other evil ism. Capitalism is not free market economics or
free enterprise. Capitalism is a scam based on debt controlled by bankers
through their issuance of credit. Capitalism as I am explaining it offers
no real protection of the producers of wealth, the hard working middle
class. The privately owned Federal Reserve Gangsters and their cohorts
created this system of irredeemable currency that protects thieves in high
places, but robs the little guy by plundering his savings. As I picture
it, Capitalism (Monetized debt) is a parasite that attached itself to the
American free enterprise system. Once attached its job is too slowly but
surely siphoned out real wealth and replaced it with debt. The results of
this evil exchange are finally becoming visible but the watchmen keep
silent. Perpetual debt was fun for them but is now it's unsustainable for
us. We can't keep it going and eat too. Paul Cappadona, Apr. 19, 2009,
NewsWithViews.com
No, Capitalism is not the answer.
Socialism is not the answer. Nothing man can build or devise will
last. There is nothing outside of the God’s government that is
sustainable. Every man as an individual in submission to God is the
only thing that will work. But this we will never have so long as
sin is still in the picture, for the sinful heart is not subject to the
law of God. It is in fact an impossibility, for the sinful heart is
in a delusional darkness that cannot be broken except that the Spirit
reveals how it is so and lifts such a one up into the light of God’s
truths. The sinful heart declares that self can rule and survive,
even thrive. In short, it declares that self can be God. But
in order for a God to be a God, He or she must be able to exist
independently of any other being or force, having all in himself
in order to continue.
All of this is why the plan of salvation has a
clear objective of eradication of the sin problem in every heart and
bringing about a willing death to self and submission to the
righteousness of God. Those that will not have it so, will at last
be abandoned to the untenable paradigm of human governance which, in
itself is a chimera, for there is a great tyrannical power that rules
humanity against which humans have no protection in themselves.
Satan has usurped control of the earth and without God’s intervention,
mankind will never escape his bondage. At last, those who have
refused the light, will remain in their darkness and justice will be meted
to the full, as God leaves the impenitent to their own government, which
will quickly extinguish itself in unchecked upheaval, confusion, violence
and passion.
At the final arraignment before the bar of God
after the millennium of Revelation 20 has past and Christ, the redeemed,
along with the Holy City, have returned to the earth, all of the wicked,
having been resurrected, have had time to organize under Satan’s
government and have forged again all of the implements of war, in
preparation for a last great effort to overthrow God’s government.
It is at the time of the final push to war against God, this time in a
physical war, as they march toward the Holy City, they are arrested by
the appearance of Christ surrounded by the redeemed, in the full glory of
the Father, over the City. There ensues a great video play in the
sky; a great panorama of the history of earth in the light of the
salvation plan, while individual consciences are fully awakened to every
detail of the life’s course in such a way as there is no escaping the
truths of the motives and intents of the hearts. It is a riveting
event, none have the power to look away or ignore it. You can read
about all of this in the last chapter of The Great Controversy.
Satan himself sees that the “reproach which he
has endeavored to cast upon Jehovah rests wholly upon himself” and bows
before God and acknowledges that his sentence of death is just.
(GC88 670.1) Satan has just been unmasked completely and those who
have followed him now see clearly that this cause is an utter failure.
Note how this turns out:
“Notwithstanding that Satan has been constrained
to acknowledge God's justice, and to bow to the supremacy of Christ, his
character remains unchanged. The spirit of rebellion, like a mighty torrent,
again bursts forth. Filled with frenzy, he determines not to yield the
great controversy. The time has come for a last desperate struggle
against the King of Heaven. He rushes into the midst of his subjects, and
endeavors to inspire them with his own fury, and arouse them to instant
battle. But of all the countless millions whom he has allured into
rebellion, there are none now to acknowledge his supremacy. His power is
at an end. The wicked are filled with the same hatred of God that
inspires Satan; but they see that their case is hopeless, that they
cannot prevail against Jehovah. Their rage is kindled against Satan and
those who have been his agents in deception, and with the fury of demons
they turn upon them. {GC88 671.2}
“Saith the Lord: ‘Because thou hast set thine
heart as the heart of God; behold, therefore I will bring strangers upon
thee, the terrible of the nations; and they shall draw their swords
against the beauty of thy wisdom, and they shall defile thy brightness.
They shall bring thee down to the pit.’ ‘I will destroy thee, O covering
cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. . . . I will cast thee to
the ground. I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee.’ ‘I
will bring thee to ashes upon the earth in the sight of all them that
behold thee. . . . Thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be any
more.’” [Ezekiel 28:6-8, 16-19.] {GC88 672.1}
These are very significant passages in
inspiration. I am not going fully into this subject at this time,
with full discussion of the fires that come, etc., but want all to think
about how the wicked perish at last. The Bible language is often
formulated in such a way as to depict God as the primary effecter of
destruction. Note that God says He will destroy Satan. The
mechanism here revealed is that full disclosure is given in
judgment. Each one sees their own heart and motive and every
rejection of opportunity to walk the path of light and redemption.
They see also the full revelation of their chosen master, Satan.
Satan loses their support and a great conflagration ensues. Their
fury and passion arises against Satan and others around them. They
(the deceived) are shown to be the ones who bring Satan down to the pit
(death). Implements of war are deployed and it is highly likely
that they are fired. God lets go of all protective forces and all
hell breaks loose, literally. Fire from below, fire from above, as
weaponry sets off all sorts of reactions. Yes, it says fire from
God out of heaven. There was fire from God out of heaven that
destroyed Job’s sheep and servants, too. (Job 1:16). While
there is a literal super hot burning, such that all the elements melt,
there is more going on here. Literal fire will destroy humans
quickly, but does not destroy spiritual beings. The sufferings that
are endured are not so much in the physical realm as they are in the
spiritual/emotional/mental realm. (I can provide you with study on
this subject if you are interested in pursuing it further.)
How the issues surrounding Sustainable
Development lead into a discussion of the final demise of the wicked may
not be clear to some. I bring all of this forward to underscore
where it is that “human” governance, under Satan, leads. That is,
to hell. This world is nothing but a superhighway to
destruction. Babylon is fallen. Man cannot build a tower big
enough to save himself. Whether you believe that the Green Agenda
is legitimate or not is actually irrelevant to this point. The main
issue is that man cannot form any utopian or even “Sustainable” system
that will bring peace and life. It is all vanity and
futility. ~KS
THE WRENCHING TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICA
By Tom DeWeese
April 22, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
[Ed note: this speech was
delivered in Kalispell, Montana
and Spokane, Washington to County Republican
Lincoln Day dinners in late March. The speech caused a firestorm in Spokane, resulting
in a battle with the local city council over it’s partnership with ICLEI
and radical environmental policy. One elected official said I had exposed
too much – as he walked out on my presentation. The battle goes on
today.]
Ladies and gentlemen, I’ve come a
long way to get here and I have such a short time to be with you. So,
let’s just get everything out on the table right now, shall we?
I believe the American people, and
their every action, are being ruled, regulated, restricted, licensed,
registered, directed, checked, inspected, measured, numbered, counted,
rated, stamped, censured, authorized, admonished, refused, prevented,
drilled, indoctrinated, monopolized, extorted, robbed, hoaxed, fined,
harassed, disarmed, dishonored, fleeced, exploited, assessed, and taxed
to the point of suffocation and desperation.
America is drowning in a sea of rules and regulations,
particularly under the guise of “saving the environment.”
We all know something is very
wrong and we are trying to fix it.
Many in America attempt to fight
against one issue or another as they try to understand what is happening
to their country. But most fail to see the whole picture and are being
crushed under a well organized “divide and conquer” tactic that keeps
them reeling from crisis to crisis.
Tonight, I’m going to try to give
you at least a peek at the all-encompassing, gut wrenching national
transformation that we face -- and, hopefully, help to lift the veil of
confusion.
To put things in perspective, here
are some questions every American should ask their elected officials –
especially those supporting “climate change” legislation.
If it is proven that climate
change is not man-made, but natural, will you be relieved and excited to
know that man is off the hook?
We’ve been terrorized into
accepting that human society was on the brink of extinction because of
man-made global warming. We’ve been warned that, unless we take drastic
action to reverse it – then islands will disappear, whole cities will be
destroyed and polar bears will drown.
So, if it’s not true, will you now
help to remove all of the draconian regulations passed during the global
warming hysteria? Will you help to restore our Republic with common sense
and sound economics?
Their answers to these questions
should be very illuminating as to the true agenda they seek to impose.
If they are supporting climate
change legislation because of a genuine concern for the environment, then
they should now be greatly relieved to know that true science is showing
more and more evidence that there is no man-made global warming, and in
fact, a natural cooling period has begun.
I have just returned from one of
the most important Climate Change conferences ever held. Sponsored by the
Heartland Institute, more than 700 scientists from all over the world
came together to testify that man-made Global Warming does not exist.
Harvard scholar and climate
scientist Willie Soon said it best in a recent article he titled, “It’s
the Sun, stupid.”
Dr. Mark Campbell, professor of
chemistry at the U.S. Navel Academy in Annapolis recently wrote, “The sky is
not burning, and to claim that it is amounts to journalistic
malpractice.”
Said U.S. Government atmospheric
scientist Stanley B, Goldenberg, “It is a blatant lie put forth in the
media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t
buy into anthropogenic global warming.”
In the past year, more than 650
scientists from around the world have expressed their doubts. That’s 12
times the number of UN IPCC global warming alarmists.
Top that with the fact that more
than 31,000 American scientists have signed a petition saying there is no
convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide,
methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing disruption of the Earth’s
climate.
Of course most of the hysteria has
been fueled by Al Gore’s Oscar-winning, Nobel prize-winning film “An
Inconvenient Truth,” which almost every American school student has been
forced to watch endless times in their classroom.
Well, guess what, the government
of Great Britain
just ruled that the film cannot be shown in English classrooms unless it
carries a disclaimer that says the film is full of mistakes and
propaganda.
An overwhelming majority of
scientist are now telling us that investigative research shows any
warming actually stopped in 1999. And, in fact, they say the brief
warming period we experienced in the past decade was completely natural,
caused in part by storms on the sun, not CO2 emissions from SUVs.
The Sun storms have ended and now
a cooling period has begun.
That’s it. Done. Crisis over. Man
is not to blame. Hurray! The nation should be rejoicing.
No need for expensive green cars,
mercury-filled light bulbs, special home building materials, expensive
alternative energy, no bird-killing windmills, no special energy taxes,
no extra government oversight committees, no more global climate change
conferences – and no need for a Climate Czar. Carol Browner can go back
into mothballs.
We can finally clean out the ten
feet of fuel on the bottom of the forests and prevent the massive forest
fires. We can reestablish the timber industry and all the jobs that were
killed.
We can drill American oil and end
our dependency on foreigners who hate us. In fact, that stable source of
energy will help restore the Detroit
auto industry and all of those jobs. And it will help us to stop funding
terrorists. What’s not to like about drilling American oil?
We didn’t need a stimulus package
after all – the economy will rebound on its own. We are free. The
environment is not in crisis. Rejoice! Rejoice!
That silence you hear is the news
media, which refuses to report what any skeptic has to say.
That silence you hear is the lack
of effort on Capitol Hill to start to pull back from the climate change
hysteria.
That silence you hear is from the
White House where President of Change, Barack Obama now has an EPA director,
a Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) director and a full blown
Climate Change Czar, all working to impose huge cut backs in energy use,
with more taxes, and more rules and regulations that will bring an
already damaged economy to its knees – all in the name of man-made Global
Warming – which doesn’t exist.
…And that silence you hear is from
global corporations which have bought into Al Gore’s lie and invested
heavily in the promised green economy. In fact, their dollars are the
only thing green about any of it. Their commercials are promoting the
lies and changing our way of life. “Going Green” is the mantra of the
day. None of them are about to change any of these policies, simply to
accommodate a few inconvenient scientific facts.
In spite of all the evidence to
the contrary, in spite of literally thousands of real scientists joining
the ranks of the skeptics, Gore just told Congress that the Global
Warming crisis is even worse than predicted. Obama, our newly crowned
king said, “The science is settled.”
Why do they continue to promote a
lie? Because global warming never was about protecting the environment.
It’s nothing more than the excuse to enforce global governance on the
planet by creating a new global economy based on the environment rather
than on goods and services.
In fact, the most important debate
in the history of the United
States is about to begin – it’s the
battle over a completely new economic system based on Climate Change
called Cap and Trade.
It should be called Tax and Trade
as it will force up the price of every item created or run by energy from
gasoline to toothpaste to natural gas to hotel rooms, as we sit in our
cold, dark homes.
Cap and Trade will throw out the
old system of a free market based on goods and services and operate on
the idea that CO2 is a pollutant. Instead of money, wealth will be
determined by how many government-issued emission permits you own to
allow you to operate your business.
In short, it’s all about wealth redistribution. Your wealth into a green
rat hole.
During the Cold War, communists
tried to get us to surrender our liberties and way of life for the wisdom
of Karl Marx. Americans didn’t buy it.
But now, they have taken the same
clap trap and wrapped it all in a nice green blanket, scaring us with
horror stories about the human destruction of the environment – and so we
are now throwing our liberties on the bon fire like a good old fashioned
book burning -- all in the name of protecting the planet.
It sounds so friendly. So
meaningful. So urgent. But, the devastation to our liberty and way of
life is the same as if Lenin ordered it.
You know, we have a new language
invading our government at all levels. Old words with new meanings fill
government policy papers. The typical city council meeting discusses
“community development,” “historic preservation,” and “partnerships”
between the city and global corporations.
Civic leaders organize community
meetings run by “facilitators,” as they outline a “vision” for the town,
enforced by “consensus.” No need for debate when you have consensus!
People of great importance testify
before congressional committees of the dire need for “social justice.”
Free trade, social justice, consensus,
global truth, partnerships, preservation, stakeholders, land use,
environmental protection, development, diversity, visioning, open space,
heritage, comprehensive planning, critical thinking, and community
service are all part of our new language.
What are they really talking
about? What mental pictures come to mind when those words are used?
George Orwell realized that those who control language and manipulate key
phrases can control policy.
The language is being changed and
manipulated to quietly implement a very destructive policy. One outlined
in a UN soft-law document called Agenda 21, first revealed at the UN’s
Earth Summit in 1992. The working name is Sustainable Development.
Rather than good management of
resources, Sustainable Development has come to mean denied use and
resources locked away from human hands. In short, it has become a code
word for an entire economic and social agenda.
I have spent most of the past 12 years studying every facet of this new
political agenda which is fast becoming a revolution -- touching every
aspect of our businesses, our public education system, our private
property, our families and our individual lives.
Interestingly, it is not a
Republican or Democrat issue. It’s not liberal or conservative. It is
being implemented on a purely bipartisan basis.
It is now the official policy of
the United States,
put in force by literally every department of the government.
It is the official policy of every
state government, and nearly every city, town and county in the nation.
But, I warn you, accepting the
perception that Sustainable Development is simply good environmental
stewardship is a serious and dangerous mistake.
So what is Sustainable Development?
The Sustainablists insist that society be transformed into feudal-like
governance by making nature the central organizing principle for our
economy and society.
To achieve this, Sustainablist
policy focuses on three components; global land use, global education,
and global population control.
Keep in mind that America
is the only country in the world based on the ideals of private property.
But, private property is incompatible with the collectivist premise of
Sustainable Development.
If you doubt that, then consider
this quote from the report of the 1976 UN’s Habitat I conference which
said: “Land …cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by
individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the
market. Private
land ownership is
also a principle instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth,
therefore, contributes to social injustice.”
It is a social injustice for some
to have prosperity if others do not. It is a social injustice to keep our
borders closed. It is a social injustice for some to be bosses and others
to be merely workers.
Social justice is a major premise
of Sustainable Development. Another word for social justice, by the way,
is Socialism. Karl Marx was the first to coin the phrase “social justice.”
Some officials try to pretend that
Sustainable Development is just a local effort to protect the environment
-- just your local leaders putting together a local vision for the
community. Have you heard that one?
Then ask your local officials how
it is possible that the exact language and tactics for implementation of
Sustainable Development are being used in nearly every city around the
globe from Lewiston, Maine
to Singapore.
Local indeed.
Sustainable Development is the
process by which America
is being reorganized around a central principle of state collectivism
using the environment as bait.
The best way to understand what
Sustainable Development actually is can be found by discovering what is
NOT sustainable.
According to the UN’s Biodiversity
Assessment Report, items for our everyday lives that are NOT sustainable
include: Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building
fences, industry, single family homes, paved and tarred roads, logging
activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic
systems that fail to set proper value on the environment (capitalism,
free markets).
Maurice Strong, Secretary General
of the UN’s Rio Earth Summit in 1992 said, “…Current lifestyles and
consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat
intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air-conditioning,
and suburban housing are not sustainable.”
Are you starting to see the pattern behind Cap and Trade, the Clean Air Act,
the Clean Water Act, and all of those commercials you’re forced to watch
about the righteousness of Going Green?
And one of the most destructive
tools they use to force it on us is something called the “precautionary
principle.” That means that any activities that might threaten human
health or the environment should be stopped -- even if no clear cause and
effect relationship has been established – and even if the potential
threat is largely theoretical.
That makes it easy for any
activist group to issue warnings by news release or questionable report
and have those warnings quickly turned into public policy – just in case.
So how is this wrenching
transformation being put into place?
There are four very specific routes being used.
In the rural areas it’s called the Wildlands Project.
In the cities it’s called smart growth. In business it’s called
Public/Private Partnerships.
And in government it’s called
stakeholder councils and non-elected boards and regional government.
The Wildlands Project was the brainchild of Earth First’s Dave Foreman
and it literally calls for the “re-wilding” of 50% of all the land in
every state – back to the way it was before Christopher Columbus set foot
on this land. It is a diabolical plan to herd humans off the rural lands
and into human settlements. Crazy you say! Yes. Impossible? Not so fast.
From the demented mind of Foreman,
the plan became the blueprint for the UN’s Biodiversity Treaty. So now
the scheme is international in scope.
But how do you remove people from
the land? One step at a time. Let’s begin with a biosphere reserve. A
national park will do. A huge place where there is no human activity. How
about Yellowstone
National Park? Then
you establish a buffer zone around the reserve. Inside the buffer only
limited human activity is allowed. Slowly, you squeeze until you squash
that human activity.
Once accomplished, you extend the
area of the biosphere to the limits of the former buffer area – and then
you create a new buffer zone around the now larger biosphere and start
the process over again. In that way, the Biosphere Reserve acts like a
cancer cell, ever expanding, until all human activity is stopped.
And there are many tools in place
to stop human activity and grow the reserve.
Push back livestock’s access to
river banks on ranches. 300 feet ought to do it. When the cattle can’t
reach the stream, the rancher can’t water them -- he goes out of
business.
Lock away natural resources by
creating national parks. It shuts down the mines -- and they go out of
business.
Invent a Spotted Owl shortage and
pretend it can’t live in a forest where timber is cut. Shut off the
forest. Then, when no trees are cut, there’s nothing to feed the mills
and then there are no jobs, and -- they go out of business.
Locking away land cuts the tax
base. Eventually the town dies. Keep it up and there is nothing to keep
the people on the land – so they head to the cities. The wilderness grows
– just like Dave Foreman planned.
It comes in many names and many
programs. Heritage areas, land management, wolf and bear reintroduction,
rails to trails, conservation easements, open space, and many more.
Each of these programs is designed
to make it just a little harder to live on the land – a little more
expensive – a little more hopeless. Now tell me how they can deny that
the process is herding people into human habitat areas?
Today, here in your area, one of
the latest Wildlands scheme is called Yukon
to Yellowstone or Y2Y -- a 2000 mile no-man’s land corridor from the
Arctic to Yellowstone.
The second path is called Smart
Growth. After they herd you into the city, they have more plans for you
in regimented and dense urban communities. They put a line around the
city and tell you no growth can take place outside that line. Urban
sprawl, they say disdainfully.
They refuse to build more roads as
a ploy to get you out of your car into public transportation, restricting
mobility. Those able to build apartment houses may find it impossible to
provide parking – we don’t want any stinking cars!
Because there is a restriction on
space inside the controlled city limits there is a shortage of houses, so
prices go up. That means populations will have to be controlled, because
now there is a shortage of land.
Third, inside the human habitat
areas, government is controlled by an elite ruling class called stake
holder councils.
These are mostly Non-governmental
organizations, or NGOs, who, like thieves in the night, just show up to
stake their claim to enforce their own private agendas.
The function of legitimate
government within the system will be simply to enforce the dictates of
the councils.
The councils are unelected, but
all powerful. They are controlled by a small minority in the community.
They will make you ask permission for anything necessary to live in the
community. They can dictate the kind of building materials you may use in
your home – or whether you can build on your property at all.
Then, if they do grant a permit for
building, they might not decide to let you acquire water and electricity
for your new home – and they may or may not give you a reason for being
turned down.
They can even dictate that you get
the proper exercise – as determined by the government. San Francisco has built a new federal
building – the greenest ever built. But the elevators will only stop on
every third floor so riders are forced to use stairs – for their own
health, of course.
These councils fit almost
perfectly the definition of a State Soviet: a system of councils that
report to an apex council and then implement a predetermined outcome.
Soviets are the operating mechanism of a government-controlled economy.
The fourth path is
Public/Private Partnerships. Today, many freedom organizations are
presenting PPPs as free enterprise and a private answer for keeping taxes
down by using business to make a better society.
In truth, many PPPs are nothing
more than government-sanctioned monopolies in which a few businesses are
granted special favors like tax breaks, the power of eminent domain,
non-compete clauses and specific guarantees for return on their
investments.
That means they can charge what
they want and they can use the power of government to put competition out
of business. That is not free enterprise. And it is these global
corporations that are pushing the green agenda.
For example, using government to
ban its own product, General Electric is forcing the mercury-laden green
light bulb on you, costing 5 times the price of incandescent bulbs. Such
is the reality of green industry.
PPPs are building the Trans Texas
Corridor, using eminent domain to take more than 580,000 acres of private
land - sanctioned by the partnership with the Texas government.
And PPPs are taking over highways
and local water treatment plants in communities across the nation. It is
not free enterprise, but a Mussolini-type fascism that will only lead to
tyranny. And it’s all driven by the Agenda 21 blueprint of Sustainable
Development.
Truly, Sustainable Development is
designed to change our way of life. Local communities are now being
targeted by international forces. Here’s how.
In June 2005, I reported on the
UN’s efforts to recruit the nation’s mayors to directly impose
Sustainable Development policy into our local communities. The mayors
were invited to attend the UN’s World Environment Day conference in San Francisco.
The mayors weren’t there to simply
discuss policy, they actually committed to an agenda with specific goals.
As part of their participation, the mayors were pressed to commit to
specific legislation and policy goals by signing a slate of UN accords.
Two documents were presented for the mayors’ signature.
The first document was called the
Green Cities Declaration, produced by the United Nations Environment
Programme. This document was essentially a statement of principles which
set the agenda for the mayors’ assigned tasks.
The Declaration is amazingly bold
in that it details exactly how the UN intends to implement a very
specific agenda in every town and city in the nation. The final line of
the Declaration explained the UN’s goal very explicitly: Each year
cities shall pick three actions to adopt as policies or laws.”
The second document signed by the mayors was called the “Urban
Environment Accords.” The document includes exactly 21 specific actions
(as in Agenda 21), for the mayors to take -- controlled by a time table
for implementation.
For example, under the topic of
energy, action item number 1 called for the mayors to implement a policy
to increase the use of “renewable” energy by 10% within seven years.
Energy action item numbers 2 and 3 dealt with reducing energy
consumption.
These action items are classic
examples of the UN trying to go around the U.S. Congress and federal
energy policy and force a backdoor implementation of the UN’s Kyoto
Accord, which the U.S.
has never ratified.
Perhaps the most egregious action
item offered in the Urban Environmental Accords dealt with the topic of
water. Action item number 19 called for adoption and implementation of a
policy to reduce individual water consumption.
The UN document begins by stating:
“Cities with potable water consumption greater than 100 liters per
capita per day will adopt and implement policies to reduce consumption by
10% by 2015.” There is no scientific basis for the 100 liter figure
other than to employ a very clever use of numbers to lower the bar and
control the debate over water consumption.
You must be aware that 100 liters
is equal to about 26 GALLONS per person, per day. According to the UN,
each person should have less than 26 gallons each day to drink, bathe,
flush toilets, wash clothes, water lawns, wash dishes, cook, take care of
pets, and more.
© 2009 Tom DeWeese - All Rights
Reserved
|